Sisco V. Jeffrey Sico Case Summary
In the Ricci v. DeStefano case, Ricci a white male filed a disparate impact lawsuit under the Title VII. Ricci past the test that was given to be promoted within the fire department. Ricci was one of many (white) candidates to passed the test. The testing service hired to administer the test discarded all test because many minorities did not pass. Dothard case would fall under the disparate impact provision because unless the weight testing requirements are revised to be fair to all regardless of gender, more men will continue to outperform women.
• Per NYPD arrest report, MOS Harris and Denizard were responding to a 911 for robbery and when they arrived complaining witness identified P as one of the perpetrator. MOS Harris and Denizard identified themselves as officer and P took off running. MOS Harris and Denizard chased P and engaged in a struggle. P punched MOS Denizard causing MOS Denizard to fall to the ground and injury his knee. MOS Denizard was unable to walk on his knee.
INTRODUCTION: This case involves the arrest of Suspect Davian Thomas for driving with a suspended license in violation of CVC 14601.1(a)-Suspended Driver 's License. INVESTIGATION: On 07-22-16, at 1701 hours, I was working uniformed patrol with Officer Harrell #3441. We were traveling east on Washington Boulevard approaching El Sereno Avenue.
P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that she was in her kitchen when MOS broke her front door and entered the apartment and pushed her against the wall. P alleges that MOS handcuffed her and Noel Tartlaon, Noel Tartlaon, Jr. and Farrow Wright (non-parties). Defendant MOS Jose Peinan states that MOS were executing a search warrant obtain after confidential informant bought drugs form Jumaane, (non-party). MOS Peinan states that Jumane was arrested in the lobby and narcotics were recovered from him.
Case Brief Case title: Santobello V. New York, 404 U.S 257 (1971) Facts: Santobello was indicted with two felonies and plead guilty to a lesser offense after negotiating with the prosecutor. The offense that he did plead guilty had a maximum sentence to only a year in jail, which was less than the original two felonies, and the prosecutor at the time said he wouldn’t recommend anything to the judge. However, a different prosecutor took over the case and did end up recommending the maximum sentence. The defendant’s, Santobello’s, attorney objected and told the judge of the deal that the former prosecutor made a deal to not recommend sentencing, but the judge said that no one influenced him and that the he believed the maximum one year sentence was appropriate based on Santobello’s criminal record.
Analysis of issues in the motion to suppress. Argument a) The police relied on the information provided by CRI-2 to form the ground for an affidavit seeking to obtain a search warrant. The information from CRI-2 was not credible and could not be independently be relied upon or verified.
The reporting party (RP) stated on 7/21/15 a probation compliance search was performed on family member Joseph Apodaca Sr. in the family child care home. It was discovered the home was an immediate hazard to children. Present during the search were Elizabeth De La Rosa, Erica De La Rosa, and Citlaly Lopez. Also present were their children Michael Dominguez age 2 DOB 1/20/13, Isabella Garcia age 7 DOB 12/02/14, and Joseph Apodaca Jr age 1 DOB 3/17/14.
Per the summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest. Plaintiff claims that defendant PO Argelis Rodriguez and other MOS stopped him and accused him of throwing away a handgun. Plaintiff states that he did not possess a handgun. Plaintiff claims that PO Rodriguez assaulted him in the head, body, face and buttock. Plaintiff alleges that he was placed in handcuffs then his pants and underpants were removed and he was searched on the ground in public
A. Castro is likely an “owner” of the dog because the injury took place after he allowed the dog inside his house, and took care of Puccini when he gave her a treat and bowl of water. A person is considered an owner of an animal, with or without the permission of the legal owner, if that person voluntarily assumes responsibility of an animal, or exerts a level of control over that animal. Steinberg v. Petta, 501 N.E.2d 1263, 1265-67 (Ill. 1986); Beggs v. Griffith, 913 N.E.2d at 1234; Docherty v. Sadler, 689 N.E.2d at 334. A court will not exclude a person from ownership because of the short contact with that animal.
P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that he was giving his friend a cane when MOS arrested him. P alleges that he did not have any drugs instead his friend (non-party) had Xanax pills. MOS state that UC observed P in hand to hand drug transaction. P was unable to make bail and remained incarcerated for 6 days.
Terminiello was arrested by the police because of the breach of peace. Terminiello was convicted for his major role in the riots. The Terminiello v Chicago case was a five to four decision that lead to an appeal. Terminiello v Chicago can be applied to Jones because political protest is being used.
Sacco and Vanzetti, contained on May 15 for the Braintree Murder and
Case Gone Wrong: Anthony vs State of Florida Case No. 5D11-2357 If ever there was a botched case it was this one with inconsistencies on the part of the State being overwhelming. I watched this trial intently and read everything available.
“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” Chief Justice John Roberts stated this on the Supreme Court case of Ricci v. DeStefano. This case, which was on the issue of discrimination of African American firefighters in the city of New Haven, Connecticut, isn’t the only one of its kind. Brown v. Board of Education, Korematsu v. U.S., and Batson v. Kentucky are just a few of many. Cases like these, the situations in Ferguson, Missouri, Baltimore, Maryland, and Sanford, Florida, have all occurred because of racial discrimination.
"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.
More about Sisco V. Jeffrey Sico Case Summary
Ricci V. Destefano Case Study
93 Words | 1 PagesMo Harris And Denizard Case Summary
109 Words | 1 PagesCvc 1461 Case Study 1
277 Words | 2 PagesPros And Cons Of Noel Tartlaon
90 Words | 1 PagesSummary Of Santobello V. New York, 404 US
431 Words | 2 PagesAguilar Vs Texas Case Analysis
731 Words | 3 PagesJoseph Apodaca Research Paper
217 Words | 1 PagesRodriguez Vs. Rodriguez Case Study
79 Words | 1 PagesSteinberg V. Petta, 739 N. E.: A Case Study
336 Words | 2 PagesP Alleges Excessive Force And False Tort: Case Study
81 Words | 1 PagesWhat Is The Te Terminiello Vs Chicago Case
77 Words | 1 PagesThe Controversial Case Of Nicola Sacco And Bartolomeo Vanzetti
1058 Words | 5 PagesAnthony V. State Of Florida Case No. 5D11-2357
416 Words | 2 PagesRicci V. Destefano Case
398 Words | 2 PagesCase: State Of California Vs. Scott Lee Peterson
716 Words | 3 Pages