ipl-logo

Summary Of Santobello V. New York, 404 US

431 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Prosecutorial misconduct legal definition

Case Brief
Case title: Santobello V. New York, 404 U.S 257 (1971)
Facts: Santobello was indicted with two felonies and plead guilty to a lesser offense after negotiating with the prosecutor. The offense that he did plead guilty had a maximum sentence to only a year in jail, which was less than the original two felonies, and the prosecutor at the time said he wouldn’t recommend anything to the judge. However, a different prosecutor took over the case and did end up recommending the maximum sentence. The defendant’s, Santobello’s, attorney objected and told the judge of the deal that the former prosecutor made a deal to not recommend sentencing, but the judge said that no one influenced him and that the he believed the maximum one year sentence was appropriate based on Santobello’s criminal record. Therefore, Santobello was sentenced to a year in jail. Santobello tried to recant his guilty plea since the promise from the former prosecutor was not valid, but his request was denied. Then he tried to make an appeal to the court but the court decided that the just because a prior promise didn’t happen, didn’t …show more content…

Yes.

Court Decision: The U.S Supreme court remanded it back to the court in New York and let them decide.

Holding: When the defendant enters a plea of guilt under a plea bargain and the court accepts it, it is the civil right of the defendant for the agreement under the bargain to be enforced. If what is stated in the plea bargain isn’t kept, it’s up to the court to decide whether or not the prosecution is required to enforce the agreement or if the defendant can have the opportunity to take back the plea of guilt. In this case, the broken agreement was enough to allow the defendant to take back his plea and go back to court for a new

Show More
Related
86 Words | 1 Pages

• P alleges excessive force and false arrest for criminal possession of a controlled substance. P alleges that he was driving his friend, Luis Zapata’s minivan when MOS pulled him over. P alleges that he provided MOS with a valid Puerto Rico’s driver’s license. P alleges he was strip searched at the precinct. Narcotics were in plain view.

Read More
421 Words | 2 Pages

Miller was sentenced to a maximum of 32 months, and a minimum of 12 months in prison. Miller appealed his conviction claiming that he was “entrapped”, and that the prosecutor committed misconduct. Issue: Was

Read More
1347 Words | 6 Pages

The Supreme Court of New Jersey also failed in their jobs. They failed to allow evidence from another case that was in some ways connected to the defendants Case. Another item that the Supreme Court failed to do was disregard anything the defendant stated under the circumstance that all of his interrogations were not recorded. I don’t dislike the police, but the fact that the recorder was on the table and the police did not turn it on raises the question of “was it a false confession?”

Read More
1680 Words | 7 Pages

People of the State of New York v. Jennifer Jorgensen was criminal court case that went to the Court of Appeals in New York. Judge Pigott gives his/her opinion. Jennifer Jorgensen was 34 weeks on the date of the crime. Defendant was under the influenced of both drugs and alcohol. Jorgensen was driving under the influence on Whiskey Road in Suffolk County.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Case Analysis In the court case, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 US. 357 (1998), the defendant was not allowed to obtain any weapons while on parole. In 1983, Scott pleaded ‘nolo contendere’, which means that he doesn’t wish to contend or agree to the guilty charge, to third degree murder. He was sentenced ten to twenty years to prison.

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

Case Summary Part 1 The prosecution is legally bound to disclose to the defense evidence that is favorable to the defendant. Three examples of the prosecutor’s obligations to disclose evidence are Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976). According to Rule 3.8, “the prosecutor must make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Analysis of Kelo vs. New London The unpopular Supreme Court decision of Kelo vs. New London has broken many citizens trust in having secured property rights. In Kelo vs. New London, the City of New London was condemning the property of several homeowners, in order to sell the land to private developers that would use the land to make a retail condo development. The local government approved the new development in order to gain higher tax revenue and to bring more jobs to the area. Homeowners who believed that their waterfront residence was being unfairly taken contested the City’s actions in court.

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

He appealed the ruling in 2014. He claimed that according to his lawyers, if he pled guilty, he would only

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

The defenses’ argument was to let Johnson only sever for 15 years in exchange. Goldman proposed to have the court consider the appeal before the sentence claiming that it would “cause irreparable harm to his client.” As well as the other attorney’s representing the others who were arrested had them “not guilty pleas on their behalf and called the six-figure bails excessive (Bichao).” The other members that were also caught in relation to the robberies weren’t treated as harsh than

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

William A. Flores BUL – 5332 FACTS: Harry Robinson and his family decided to move from Massena, New York, a small town on the St. Lawrence Seaway to Tucson, Arizona. Kay was driving the 1976 Audi 100 LS that she and Harry bought from Seaway Volkswagen in Massena to Tucson, Arizona when accident transpired just a few miles outside Tulsa County in Creek County, Oklahoma. A car behind them crashed into the rare side of the Audi and immediately started a fire in the area over the back seat after they got hit. The blazed spread quickly over the rare seat, and the inside of the car got rapidly hot.

Read More
116 Words | 1 Pages

The 5 who had been jail sued New York City in 2003 for malicious prosecution. They also included racial discrimination, and emotional distress in the law suits. The city refused to settle the suits for a decade under then-Mayor Michael Bloomberg. It is hard for the city to say we mess up on an grand scale because the city 's lawyers felt they would win. However, after Bill de Blasio became Mayor and supported the settlement.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

In 1959, Robert Brady was charged with kidnapping, which inflicted capital punishment if convicted by the jury. Brady first pled not guilty, but once he learned that his partner in crime agreed to plead guilty and testify against Brady, he later changed his plea of not guilty, to guilty. Brady’s plea was accepted, after being questioned on his voluntariness of the plea, and was sentenced to 50 years in prison, which was later lessened to 30 years. Afterwards, in 1967, Brady requested post-conviction relief stating that under 28 U.S.C 2255, “his guilty plea was not voluntarily given because 1201 (a) persuaded his plea from his counsel… also that the trial judge had not complied with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Brady v.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

There are two things Judge Scola has to focus, one is whether the punishment for the crime will lose much of its effect because there is a big time gap between the crime and sentence, and second, whether the accuser will learn not to repeat the same behavior again. Crime magnitudes not always goes together with the magnitude of the punishment because many people have gotten away with serious crimes without any punishment, for example in the case of George Zimmerman were he fatally shoot Trayvon Martin in a racial hate act, at the time of the crime many people though he was innocent but as we have seen with his behavior before his death he was not the vigilant civilian many though on the contrary, I believe that he got away with murder. Zimmerman case not only prove that sometimes the law doesn’t always provides the right punishment for the individual but also prove that without punishment does not always mean that individual will learn from its

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

The Exclusionary rule in the United States constitutional law simply states that any evidence taken from people with forced, shall not be allowed in court. Any evidence taken in an illegal search and seizure may not be used in court. The United State Supreme Court in conjunction with maintain the sole of the Constitution uses a combination of the fourth, fifth, sixth and even the fourteenth amendment to keep true the heart of “good faith" and the “fruit of the poisonous tree" or the exclusionary rule (Teacher, 2013). It will be prudent to understand these amendments, to how apply them. The Fourth Amendment main intentional creation to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizures.

Read More
221 Words | 1 Pages

Although pleading not guilty to the

Read More

More about Summary Of Santobello V. New York, 404 US

Related Topics

Open Document