More handpicked essays just for you.
Native americans and colonialism
Native americans and colonialism
Colonization in native american communities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
But as Sitting Bull, Runs the Enemy, and many other Lakota and Cheyenne realized that day, he came frighteningly close to winning the most spectacular victory of his career.” Philbrick
Both “On Surrender at Bear Claw Mountain, 1877” by Chief Joseph and “On Women’s Right to Vote” by Susan B. Anthony are captivating speeches on the oppression of the two groups by the American Government, one on Indian relocation and suppressing their culture, and the other on women’s suffrage. In Chief Joseph's speech, he mainly applies pathos to his argument to convince General Howard and his people on why they are surrendering and create a strong emotional appeal. Susan B. Anthony however mainly utilizes logos to make her impassioned argument to convince both men and women on why women should have the right to vote and get them to stand up and support her cause. First of all, in Chief Joseph's speech, he uses pathos to get an emotional appeal from both his people and General Howard. “It is cold and we have no blankets.
Sitting bull was probably one of the most famous Native American. When sitting bull was ten he killed his first buffalo. In June 1863 he took arms against the United States for the first time. Sitting bull fought some American soldiers again the next year.
difference was Sitting Bull thought the best for the people was to fight for the land. More forts were built, Fort Union and Fort Buford went deep into Sioux land near Yellowstone, and Sitting Bull truly hated them, especially Fort Buford. By the end of the civil war people were coming in droves, the government still trying to take the land peaceable, sent in Pierre-Jean-De Smet, who was a Jesuit Priest. While Sitting Bull would not meet with government officials, he did meet with the priest. He did agree to peace, but later in the ceremony he still had the same concerns he had throughout the invasion of the land, as long as the whites left the land and stayed off, he would agree to peace.
Sitting Bull Champion of the Sioux: A Biography, by Stanley Vestal, is a great book to read for anyone wanting vivid, yet serious, insight of the lives of the Sioux Indians, or more specifically, one Sioux Indian, Sitting Bull. There are three sections in the book that describe three major time periods of Sitting Bull’s life. Each section focuses on a different time span. The author highly exceeds his goal of “writing the first biography of a great American Indian soldier and statesman in which his character and achievements are presented with the same care and seriousness they would have received had he been of European ancestry.” (xxi)
He makes a point at the beginning that back when the white man first settled in the Northwest, the abundance of salmon was so great that it was able
Both show an event in history in very different lights, showing the world that words have the power to make something into something it’s not. In his speech, Jackson makes the Indian Removal sound like a great idea, why Rutledge shows the horrors that his ancestor and their people had to endure during this horrible period in history. One very obvious difference in the texts is bias. Bias is a very important thing to consider in documents, especially when considering why something bad may be shown in a good light.
In the speech, " Black Hawk's surrender speech,1832" by Black Hawk. He has fought for his country men , against white men who came to cheat on them and take away their lands. He claimed an Indian who is as bad a a white men can not live in his nation. His council words gave his nation fare words and big promises. Black Hawk had no choice but to surrender.
I will also give some quick facts Sitting Bull the Indian. Sitting Bull was a great chief, leader, warrior, and person in general. He was know as a great warrior from a very young age. He experienced battle at a very young age, he was only fourteen when he first went to battle.
Sitting Bull who was an Indian American, was born in 1831 in Grand River Valley – South Dakota today. He was famous by his leadership and fighting capacity, and was known as a powerful chief of the Sioux tribes. When he was young, he had great bravery and determination to preserve his tribes and the Sioux’s reservation. Besides that, he also was considered as a warrior and defender and fought for some struggle between tribes such as Crow and Assiniboine, and Santee Sioux (1862). Especially, the battles of U.S. Soldier for invading the Powder River country in 1865 which gave Sitting Bull some chances to learn more about how to fight, know the strengths and weaknesses point of them.
The difference in the two accounts is the prelude to the battle. According to Lakota Chief Red Horse, he with many Sioux Indians were only moving across the land in attempts to find a place to settle. When they did settle next to the Little Bighorn River, there were many Native Americans with them ten different tribes and eleven including themselves. The account from the military standpoint was the Sioux, and Cheyenne were hostile over the Black Hills and was corresponding with Sitting Bull. From the event of the Sioux Nation on the move, the U.S. Calvary dispatched three units to attack.
He believed Jackson needed a reality check. The Indians were there first, it was their land. He force the Natives to move away from their homeland, with brute force. He believes Jackson could not justify his actions just because it was for America’s benefit. He also stated Jackson refused to listen to many people, and he refused to let Indians live.
In my early years I was chased by a pit bull, I was born on Dec. 7 1999, and I got my brother a scare while we were playing wrestling. When I was at my grandma`s house with some friends while we were chased by a pit bull because they escaped from the neighbor`s house. I was born on Dec. 7 1999 on Ponce, Puerto Rico. When I was like 5 years old I got my brother a scare playing wrestling.
The people on the reservations were “anemic on very few rations” (www.nps.gov). During the 1800s the tribes had been abused by being forced onto reservations with little food and water. Sitting Bull did not go to the reservation because he believed that this was unjust. Sitting Bull encouraged his people and many others to leave the reservation and live traditionally. Therefore Sitting Bull was a great leader when the government show exploitation to not only his people but Indian tribes overall which effected the way the government treats the tribes
It was a time when white men wanted to claim everything. They wanted to let Native Americans know they had all the fire power to do as they pleased. Sitting Bull did not agree to this IRA because in his speech he said loved the freedom to go where his people pleased, to hunt wherever, and set up teepees where they chose to set up home base. It was this act that led to Sitting Bull’s important speech. The additional information I knew prior to reading Sitting Bull’s speech is everything I had learned in high school about Native American history.
