Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Verbal irony in the necklace
Verbal irony in the necklace
Verbal irony in the necklace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Irony - Situational - where the character does something the reader does not expect In "The Cheat's Remorse", Phil cheats the young lady with his phoney coin. After he wins the dollar, he thought he would be happy; instead, he feels remorse and tries to return the dollar. - Dramatic - when the reader knows something the character is not aware of, until later in the story.
Irony What is irony? People thinks is just misfortune, but the truth is, it’s not. Irony is a situation which was intended to have a particular result, but has the opposite or different result. Situational irony is used in all three examples Situational irony is when the exact inverse of what you would expect to happen, comes about.
In “The Interlopers” and “The Necklace,” the irony is situational. The way it is situational is when the story ends something unexpected happening, like in “The Interlopers” how wolves came instead of their men, and in “The necklace” when Monsieur Loisel and Madame Loisel spent 10 years to pay off a necklace that cost 36,000 francs when the original cost only 500. In these 2 stories, it shows that irony leaves the readers wanting more, and it gives us a little bit of a surprise. Irony may leave the readers wanting more. I know of this for the fact that I have felt this when I read “The Interlopers” and “The Necklace” I was left wanting to know more and what happened after the story ended.
Situational irony is a very strange thing. In the story “The Ransom of Red Chief,” by O. henry makes situational irony with a funny humor. For instance the boy, John, is happy to be kidnapped by Bill and Sam. When asked if he would like to go home he replys “Aw what for?, I don't have any fun at home.”
"The Necklace." Explain why the ending of the story demonstrates irony. The ending of the story demonstrates irony. Because she clearly not happy with what she has in front of her. She wanted to go to the ball
At the very end of the story when Mathilde Loisel puts her pride aside she is finally able to tell her friend the truth about the necklace and how much her and her husband paid to get it replaced. Madame Forestier is shocked and says “oh, my poor Mathilde! But mine was imitation. It was worth at the very most five hundred francs” (Guy de Maupassant 5)! The reader is appalled by the irony that the necklace was not actually real and the price for it was not as much as they thought it would be.
Guy de Maupassant, the author of "The Necklace", uses foreshadowing to develop the theme that there are consequences for being untruthful. Foreshadowing gives the reader hints to predict a result in the story. In the text, Mrs.Loisel "didn't listen to him and rapidly descend the stairs. " The quote shows foreshadowing because when Mrs.Loisel didn't listen to her husband, and instead quickly left the party, it gave the reader a hint that something is going to happen to Mrs.Loisel. As the story progresses, the story states that Mrs.Loisel lost the diamond necklace and created a plan to trick Mrs.Forestier into thinking that she never lost the necklace.
Though the story never says it outright, it is shown through indirect characterization that Mathilde is very materialistic, or even avaricious at times, and desires more than she can have. This is proved throughout the entire story, with quotes like the following: “She grieved incessantly, feeling that she had been born for all the little niceties and luxuries of living” (p.221). If Mathilde could have been happy with what she and her husband could afford, she would not have felt the need to borrow jewelry from Madame Forestier, and would never have had the necklace to lose in the first
In the story “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant, Mathilde was a character whom was never happy with her life, she was greedy and always wanted more than what she had. One day Mathilde borrowed a necklace from her friend, Madame Forestier, for a ball and it ends up missing. After losing the necklace Mathilde and her husband’s life turned upside down. They lied to her friend saying the clasp broke and it was being fixed, and Mathilde and her husband went into debt trying to borrow the money to buy a new necklace to replace the lost one. Mathilde kept wondering, “What would life have been like if she had not lost the necklace?
That’s when the irony comes in and plays. After the ball, Mathilde found out that she misplaced the diamond necklace somehow because it was not on her neck. Situational irony is the resemblance in this scenario since she was having fun at the ball and now the necklace she had borrow was gone. Her dissatisfaction caused her to borrow the necklace making her life even more complicated. This lead to even a more horrible irony causing her to distance herself of her lifelong goal of having luxurious
At the time appearance and material wealth were the most important aspects of the society: “She had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that; she felt made for that.” Maupassant shows that all Mathilde, who represents French society, desires is materialistic items. Maupassant stresses that this is all she cares about by first repeating the negative “no” and “no”, then linking these with the “nothing” which relates to what she really cares about, material wealth: “And she loved nothing but that”. This highlights society’s concern with superficial materialism.
If your only goal is to become rich, you will never achieve it,” the prominent businessman of his time, John D. Rockefeller once said. This is a truth that readers learn from reading Guy de Maupassant’s short story, “The Necklace.” In this short story, a woman named Mathilde Loisel’s humility is abused by pride and greed but changed and improved as the story went along. Mathilde’s nature towards her husband and others was ungrateful and unappreciative.
The story begins with Mathilde sitting at home wondering why she couldn 't live the elaborate lifestyle. Mathilde felt entitled to every luxury and comfort of the upper class: “‘She suffered constantly, feeling that all the attributes of a gracious life, every luxury, should rightly have been hers’”(Maupassant 333). Mathilde hated her simple belongings, and she pitied herself because she was short of fortune. She felt that she deserved to be adored by men and resented by women: “‘ She had longed so eagerly to charm, to be desired, to be wildly attractive and sought after.”’
Authors use situational irony to create surprise for the reader. The author creates surprise for the reader through events in the plot. Situational irony is when there is an unexpected twist in the course of a story. O. Henry produces the emotion humor through situational irony in “The Ransom of Redchief.” Also, Guy de Maupassant creates the emotion sympathy for the reader using situational irony throughout the story “The Necklace.”
The ending of the short story “The Necklace” was fair to the main character Mathilde. Throughout the course of the story, Mathilde shows how selfish she is by requiring her husband to find her a dress and a necklace, which she borrows from a friend and and ultimately loses. She and her husband send the next ten years scrambling to pay off the debt of paying for a new necklace and by extension, pay off her greed during that night. Once their debt is paid, Mathilde is described as having been physically transformed because of working nonstop to pay it off. However, upon seeing her friend whom she had borrowed the necklace from, she says, “‘Yes, I’ve had some hard times since I saw you last... all on your account’”