Slaughterhouse, does not sound very attractive in a title and especially with the number five thrown in there, so for the sake of not arguing we can all agree that the title of the novel is not the best, but it is not the title of the novel that I am fighting for, but the context and ideas behind that very same title. Slaughterhouse Five is not a very well known book among the newer generations of teenagers, but that does not mean it should be forgotten about or taken off any school curriculum. Although Kurt Vonnegut’s novel, Slaughterhouse Five, may have explicit content, a skewed reality, and may be too complex, it should be kept in today’s curriculum for a more mature audience at a junior or senior level, because it portrays real life struggles, historical value, and complex theories. …show more content…
The reason that this is so important is because that novel reveals that real life struggles of a real man in a entertaining fashion. It helps the reader better understand life as a prisoner of war and life as a person back in the 1900’s. Some people might say that the novel has too much explicit content to be contained in a school curriculum, but that is the whole point. The explicit content is what helps the reader visual the struggles that the author went through in order to survive and live to write the book in the first place. Although some of the novel is completely fiction for the purposes of entertaining the reader, this does not take away from its