ipl-logo

Slobodan Antonic's Could A Confederation Have Saved Yugoslavia

1083 Words5 Pages

The ties that bound the republics institutionally, politically, and economically were fraying at the seams, but can these incentives be linked to the overall demise of the Yugoslav state? The literature suggests yes, these institutionally motivated behaviors can be linked to processes that were triggers for state breakdown. The first corrosive process was the gridlock. Several constitutional amendment processes were started to no avail in the 80s. These included compromises that would reform Yugoslavia into such a loose confederation, as to be even less pressing then the then European Community, and those that rebound it tightly into a federation. In Slobodan Antonić’s 2007 paper “Could a Confederation Have Saved Yugoslavia” he outlines this process, in which each republic would propose reforms that would be unilaterally rejected by anyone who was not already a …show more content…

He writes “Indeed, the transition from communism to democracy in Eastern Europe is marked by a direct use of nationalism as the source of the political legitimacy of regimes, … And if nationalism is the technology of rule in a society dominated by politics, … it is obvious that in such societies it is easy to produce … conflicts on a long-term basis” (Antonic, 478). The article points to the idea that when the ability of the elites to maintain control of the state through its institutions breaks down, nationalism becomes the tool of choice to hold on to power, not just in Yugoslavia but regionally. The severe gridlock that plagued the republics made even having a discussion about something as fundamental as the constitutional underpinnings and relationships in the state almost impossible to have, breaking down institutions, encouraging nationalism, and leaving behind a situation ripe for

Show More
Related
190 Words | 1 Pages

Although the Articles of Confederation served a great purpose and had numerous advantages and strengths, it also contained many weaknesses with some flaws. One of the weaknesses is that this agreement could not enforce laws or have the power to tax the people of the colony. Along with this, the government could also not allow each of he states to continue to follow those laws. There was also no national army or navy, no national courts, no solid leadership or power in a position to take charge, and there was only one vote for each state no matter what the size of the state is. The main reason Americans wanted to construct a weak national government was to prevent the them from gaining too much power and allowing the government to eventually

Read More
294 Words | 2 Pages

The first government in the U.S. was called the Articles of Confederation. It was the first set of laws after the states became independent. The laws in the Confederation were very weak, and they all contracted each other. It also had a weak central/national government because the states didn’t want to give it too much power like the monarchy with the British. Some weaknesses in the first government were that each state no matter how big or small had only one vote, each state could coin its own money, making it hard to move, and lastly, they could not have a military so it would be hard to fight armed rebellions or militias.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

The constitution of the United States was a document created to fix the major problems the Confederation government had following its creation. The meetings in which the document was created founded the style of government that has lasted to this day. It created the Executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government, it created our bill of rights, and it separated powers between the states and the newly formed federal government. Negotiations started as very difficult between the representatives of the separate states.

Read More
276 Words | 2 Pages

The year of seventeen hundred eighty-seven, The US was an infant growing stronger A conviction rang unanimously among the people: The Articles of Confederation were effective no longer. And so in their stuffy waistcoats and breeches.

Read More
1902 Words | 8 Pages

This concept is commonly accepted to refer to an intense degree of intragovernmental consultation, to the basic equality of the relationship, and to the decentralizing nature of the results in this period (Dyck, 1979). Perhaps the

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

The Articles of Confederation failed because the articles offered no solutions. Many of these issues did not propose innovation and were primarily conservative providing each state with its own autonomy with minimal influence by the federal government (Schultz, n.d.). This led to multiple disagreements between each state, with each state viewing its own power as a priority over the unity of the Confederation. This created multiple weaknesses within the articles, which includes the following (Articles of Confederation, 2018). Each state, regardless of its size, only had one vote in Congress.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution The Articles of Confederation was an archetype constitution that created a nation of independent states only loosely connected together by a single congress. The founding fathers deliberately designed a nation with a very feeble central government. There was no judicial branch, no executive branch, there was no coining money, and there was no president. These were all intrinsic weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation that were entrusted to the states, weaknesses that would soon cause another rebellion. It was a confederation rather than a strong union, so in a sense we were playing with the other states on the team

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

Although the battles at Lexington and Concord signified the start of the revolutionary war, the colonies declaration for independence wasn’t signed until 1776. From that time, each colony began to act as its own separate republic. The colonial assemblies continued to meet and several states even wrote their own constitutions. Although there was forward progress at the state level, the forming of a national government was slow and relatively unsuccessful. The Continental Congress was the only representation of a national entity and was more of a coordinating body rather then a government.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

The Article of Confederation was the first written agreement in the United states. There are many strengths of the Article of Confederation. Congress gain the power to deal with foreign affairs. Not only did it they deal foreign affairs, it also dealt with Native American affairs. They also had power to regulate coinage.

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

Due to this extremely low amount of power of a central government, there was little control over legislature and organization among the economy. These problems grew until the leaders of the country convened to revise the Articles and eventually created an entirely new document due to the inefficacy of the

Read More
178 Words | 1 Pages

The primary economic reason the Articles of Confederation failed was no power to tax by the central government. The founders of the Articles of Confederation were so fearful of making another tyrannical government that they doomed themselves from the start; first by making the central government extremely weak and further did not allow that same governing body to tax for funding its on existence. “There was no president and no national court, and the powers of the national legislature were strictly limited. Most authority rested with the state legislatures because many leaders feared that a strong central government would become as tyrannical as British rule (Edwards, pg.37)”. Further, the legislature was one chamber with vote per state, amendments

Read More
1770 Words | 8 Pages

A strong foundation is what every nation needs. To build something strong and lasting, it is important to put time and effort into its structure and values. The new constitution of America is more stable and stronger than the Articles of Confederation. At a time when the states were very much divided in many matters, the constitution allowed for a unified nation under one strong central government. Drafting the constitution was a continued matter.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The Articles of Confederation were designed to be guidelines for the interactions between the states and the federal government after the Declaration of Independence and during Revolutionary War. These articles proved to be an utter failure due to a number of relevant factors including: No real power to the federal government, no means for Congress to enforce laws, and no power to implement taxation to name a few. The Congress’s powers over the states were specific and finite, it had the sole power to negotiate treaties, declare war, and make peace. It also reserved the right to maintain an army and navy and regulated interaction with Native Americans in the Western part of the country. The delegates also granted Congress the power to resolve interstate disputes,

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

This country has a rich history full of ever-changing events. Nevertheless, there is this one big concern called blood feud, for which time hasn’t done much because it looks like the moment to enjoy the right to live in freedom never came for people included in those conflicts. Blood feud is a result of the unjust laws of Kanun, which was once a kind of Constitution for Albanians. This phenomenon developed during the years of transition, turning into a very disturbing phenomenon for society, because it violates the most important human right, the right to live. There have been also other consequences in our country by denying people a number of fundamental constitutional rights, such as freedom of movement, education, employment, health care, voting, freedom of organization, etc.

Read More

More about Slobodan Antonic's Could A Confederation Have Saved Yugoslavia

Related Topics

Open Document