ipl-logo

Socrates Vs Crito Research Paper

495 Words2 Pages

In the Crito, Socrates and his long-time friend Crito discuss the complex question of whether or not Socrates should escape from jail due to his impending execution. Their argument questions whether citizens should always follow the law. They originally have different opinions and reasoning, but Crito eventually comes to agree with Socrates. Both Socrates and Crito express many valid points on the subject. Crito comes early in the morning to visit Socrates early in the morning and bribes the warden to be able to enter to visit Socrates (Crito 43a). Crito comes to tell Socrates about the plan he and others made for his escape, only to find Socrates unwilling to escape and resigned to death. Crito cites several reasons that Socrates should follow the escape plan. He first states that Socrates will be doing his friends a disservice, by “depriving them of a friend” and damaging their reputation (Crito 44b). Crito also notes the opinion of the majority (Crito 44d), Socrates’ duty to his children (Crito 45c). Crito also tries to convince Socrates that his …show more content…

Socrates firmly believes that it is a citizen’s duty to fully obey the law at all times, even though he was wrongly placed in jail (Crito 44d). He states that life is not worth living if it is corrupted (Crito 47d). One of Socrates’ arguments is that it their belief that they must never willingly do anything that is wrong, such as escaping from prison (Crito 49a-b). Socrates’ main argument is that, since he agreed to be a citizen of Athens and agreed to follow the laws he must continue to follow the laws. He states that to escape from the prison and thus nullify the laws set by the city would be to destroy the city (Crito 50). With these and several other points, Socrates successfully argues that he must remain in prison and face his

Show More
Related

Euthyphro And The Crito Analysis

529 Words | 3 Pages

However, instead of planning the escape Socrates started the dialog about why he would rather obey the law and be executed. At first, Crito presented two arguments to

Read More

Comparing Letter From Birmingham Jail By Socrates And Martin Luther King Jr.

900 Words | 4 Pages

While his friend Crito advocates for his escape, Socrates believes that disobeying the law would be morally wrong and undermine the state's authority and laws. As Socrates asserts, "Do you think it possible for a city to continue in existence and not be turned upside down if the legal judgments pronounced in it have no force but are nullified and destroyed by private individuals?" Socrates believes that by living in Athens and enjoying its benefits, he has entered into a social contract that obligates him to follow the city's laws, even if they are unjust. Socrates believed that fleeing prison or disobeying the law violated his principles and society's social contract. He believed breaching the law would harm society and weaken the state because the state's goal was to promote the common good, and laws protected everyone's interests.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Aristotle's Crito

624 Words | 3 Pages

From beginning to end, Aristotle’s captivating reading, Crito, is composed with of the three rhetorical devices: logos, pathos, and ethos. Consequentialy, one of the existent rhetorical devices is more robust than the others. Whilst logos and pathos spawn well-founded emotional and logical enticement, the most indisputable rhetorical device used throughout the story is ethos. Undoubtably, ethos is the utmost evident rhetorical device in the story, Crito, as Socrates honorably stood by his morals, even after Crito tried to prompt the man to abandon them; demonstrating his thickness of character, integrity, and honesty.

Read More

Similarities Between Socrates And Martin Luther King

872 Words | 4 Pages

He supports this claim by saying he could have left Athens at any time if he disagreed with their laws. The city educated him and allowed him to make his own decisions. Since he didn’t leave when he had the opportunity, he is agreeing to follow the cities laws. Socrates final argument is that escaping jail will ruin his reputation he has been building his whole life. After escaping Socrates couldn’t flee to a good Greek city but they won’t want him because he will have a reputation of breaking the law.

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr And Socrates Comparison Essay

648 Words | 3 Pages

Political activists and philosophers alike have a challenging task of determining the conditions under which citizens are morally entitled to go against the law. Socrates and Martin Luther King, Jr. had different opinions on the obligation of the citizens in a society to obey the law. Although they were willing to accept the legal punishment, King believed that there are clear and definable circumstances where it would be appropriate, and sometimes mandatory, to purposely disobey unjust laws. Socrates did not. Socrates obeyed what he considered to be an unjust verdict because he believed that it was his obligation, as a citizen of Athens, to persuade or obey its Laws, no matter how dire the consequences.

Read More

Socrates Argument At 50a-B Of The Crito

1118 Words | 5 Pages

In this paper I will argue that Socrates’s argument at 50a-b of the Crito would be not harming his fellow citizens by breaking the laws. Based on the readings from Plato’s The Five Dialogues, I will go over the reasoning of Socrates’ view on the good life. I will then discuss the three arguments Crito has for Socrates regarding his evasion of the death sentence including the selfish, the practicality, and the moral arguments. I will deliberate an objection to the argument and reply to the objections made in the paper and conclude with final thoughts. Socrates argues in the Crito that he should not escape or disobey the law because it is unethical.

Read More

Comparing Socrates In The Apology, Crito, And The Republic

802 Words | 4 Pages

The version of Socrates presented in both The Apology, Crito, and The Republic could very well be two different versions of Socrates as presented by Plato. However, both versions of Socrates have one thing in common: they both value the importance of philosophy and they both defend philosophy as something that is important to humanity. The Apology is Socrates defending not only himself, but also philosophy as an area of study that could be useful to the city of Athens. Socrates is trying to defend himself and his study and he tries to distance himself from the sophists in that they charge for money.

Read More

Socrates Arguments In The Crito

499 Words | 2 Pages

Socrates’ Arguments in the Crito In The Crito, Socrates argues that he should not escape prison because it would be morally incorrect. He says that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, by escaping prison, not only will he suffer the consequences but also his family, his friends, and the city of Athens. Socrates argues that the city of Athens would be affected if he escapes from prison.

Read More

Comparing Socrates Apology And The Crito

1678 Words | 7 Pages

With the Apology, and the Crito, Socrates comes to delve into his many teachings and finds himself put to death with the words of wisdom that have been passed down generation after generation. Socrates for many in this present day is a man of many words and great teachings, but anyone but Socrates thought differently, in Athens people thought of him as an annoyance rather than an integral part of society. As Socrates stood in front of the counsel of judges, he stood for what he thought was right and never changed opinion of himself or of his words. That’s why Socrates is still talked about in classrooms everywhere today.

Read More

Summary Of Crito's Three Arguments

718 Words | 3 Pages

Crito and others have the money to bribe the informers and wants Socrates to let go of his fears if he has any because it is well worth the risk. (Crito,45a.) Crito believes he will be welcome in cities such as Thessaly where he has friends that

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'

1314 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates was a greek philosopher who found himself in trouble with his fellow citizens and court for standing his grounds on his new found beliefs from his studies about philosophical virtue, justice, and truth. In “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates defended himself in trial, not with the goal of escaping the death sentence, but with the goal of doing the right thing and standing for his beliefs. With this mindset, Socrates had no intention of kissing up to the Athenians to save his life. Many will argue that Socrates’ speech was not very effective because he did not fight for his life, he just accepted the death sentence that he was punished with. In his speech he said, “But now it’s time to leave, time for me to die and for you to live.”

Read More

Socrates Should Stay In Prison Analysis

710 Words | 3 Pages

In conclusion, therefore I should stay in jail and accept the death penalty. 3. Agreement argument – if I escape, then I will break an agreement I made with this city, to break an agreement is an unjust action, doing unjust actions harms the soul, and it is better to die than to live with a ruined soul. In conclusion, Socrates should stay in jail and accept the death penalty. In conclusion Crito's arguments are very narrow.

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

To be just or to be served an injustice and obey, this is the very basis of the philosophical dialogue between Socrates and Crito. The Crito begins as one of Socrates’ wealthy friends, Crito, offers Socrates a path to freedom—to escape from Athens. Through the ensuing dialogue, Socrates examines, as a man who is bound by principles of justice, whether an unjust verdict should be responded to with injustice. In the dialogue between Socrates and Crito, Socrates outlines his main arguments and principles that prevent him from escaping under such circumstances. Socrates is under guard when Crito visits him, thus the plan to escape.

Read More

Conceptual Reconstruction: The Dialogue Of The Crito, By Plato

1421 Words | 6 Pages

Crito has an escape plan in place to break out Socrates. Socrates decides that if he were to escape it would not be morally justified. Socrates discusses why he has a duty to stay and face his charges, as well as why the action of fleeing would be unethical. To Socrates, breaking one law would be an injustice to all laws and would cause great harm to the

Read More

Private Life In Socrates's Apology

1021 Words | 5 Pages

He claims that this is how he has been able to live a long life in Athens and that he never meant any harm to the state. Socrates believes that for

Read More

More about Socrates Vs Crito Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document