The justification of Southerners came from a literal interpretation of the Bible, and many Biblical tales were utilized to justify slavery. For instance, according to Frederick Dalcho, a Southern Carolina Episcopal clergyman, Noah’s curse of the whole of Canaan was what enslaved the Africans. In the Biblical text, one story of Noah goes on to say that he slept naked after being drunk, and Ham, the father of Canaan, saw his father’s nakedness and told his two brothers. After Noah woke up and realized what his son had done to him (presumably an act of homosexuality, rape, or humiliation), Noah said, “Cursed be Canaan! The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers” (Gen. 9:25). The descendants of Canaan—the Africans—were therefore bound to be the “servants of servants,” or “the lowest state of …show more content…
Furthermore, drawing conclusions from the New Testament, Southerners restricted the social mobility of slaves: in Saint Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, one quote reads, “Let every man abide in the same calling, wherein he was called.” This essentially means that a human being should remain in the position that he or she was called to by God—for slaves this meant remaining in bondage. This lack of social mobility, in a larger context, can relate to the lack of social mobility that the untouchables—who adhered to the caste system, often unwillingly—faced in India, prior to the abolishing of untouchability through the Untouchability Offences Act, in 1955. Untouchability, although not similar to slavery, involved human beings who were considered inferior to the upper caste members in Indian society.