The similarities I will mention are expansion, competition, and dominance. Both Sparta and Rome were paying attention to expanding their territories and combining power in their regions. They saw their military overthrow as a way of accomplishing this goal. Both Sparta and Rome were challenging other city-states and kingdoms in their regions. Sparta's main enemy was Athens, while Rome's main enemy was Carthage. Both Sparta and Rome pursued to become the main power in their regions. They wanted to control the politics, trade, and military affairs of the cities they occupied.
The differences I will mention are motivation, methods, outcome, treatment of conquered peoples, and governance. Sparta's motivation for the Peloponnesian War was mainly defensive. Sparta wanted to prevent Athens from
…show more content…
On the other hand, Rome's drive for its defeats was mainly economic. Rome wanted to control the rich lands of Italy and the trade routes of the Mediterranean. Sparta's military tactic in the Peloponnesian War was mainly based on land conflicts. Sparta relied on their skilled infantry. Rome, on the other hand, used both land and sea power in their defeats. Rome established a powerful navy, which aided in defeating Carthage in the Punic Wars. The outcomes of the Peloponnesian War and Rome's defeats were also unlike. Sparta appeared as the main power in Greece, but its victory was short-lived, and Greece remained politically split. Rome, on the other hand, established a powerful empire that lasted for centuries, and its defeats paved the way for the growth of Western civilization. Another major difference between Sparta and Rome was the way they deal with conquered peoples. Sparta was famous for its harsh treatment, often enslaving or slaughtering the population. Rome, on the other hand,