ipl-logo

Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo

790 Words4 Pages

The Stanford Prison experiment was created by Psychologist / Professor Zimbardo to further educate himself about the social structure of life and how people adapt to their surroundings. He created this experiment in which he gathered students from the university, out of those students who applied to be apart of this experiment, ten students became prisoners and eleven became guards. This experiment started off well, zimbardo gather information and learned a few things. He then started to realize that the actors that took on the guard role took it to a whole other level, they became more into their roles. They took torturing to a whole other level causing numerous individuals with the prisoner roles to have psychological problems, emotional …show more content…

Well in all honesty I believe that the class has no significant impact because fear is just fear. If someone is going to be tortured because they committed a crime and young adults are in charge they do not care about the economy stability. However if we take the same situation and compare it to the prison life in reality, money does matter. Another variable would be women, if we put women in this exact situation regardless of class women would have broken down faster than the men did because in my opinion most women are not emotionally and mentally strong like men. This experiment was ethical to do because due to the knowledge obtained from the reactions, Zimbardo verified that humans adapt to their surroundings, if you set a situation up they will normalize it regardless of what it is. If I was in Zimbardo’s shoes and incharge of the whole experiment I would have probably stopped the experiment long before it got out of control due to human victimization. Trading inhuman punishment for the knowledge and education in return was some what right but the way that it evolved took the experiment to a whole other level, it should not have escalated that

Show More
Related
406 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford prison experiment was led by Philip Zimbardo with the purpose of studying the psychological effects of being a prisoner and a prison guard. The participants of the research study were male college students. Once selected, a coin toss determined which males would be prisoners and prison guards. The experiment took place at Stanford University, where a mock prison was crafted. Zimbardo acted as the warden or superintendent of the mock prison.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves

Read More
1182 Words | 5 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment shows people who are put into positions that cause them to act differently from themselves. 12 people are selected for an experiment and randomly split into two groups: 3 guards and 9 prisoners, and they dress them like their roles and give them the gadgets they normally use in that role. “Within a very short time, both guards and prisoners were settling into their new roles, with the guards adopting theirs quickly and easily. Within hours of beginning the experiment, some guards began to harass prisoners. They behaved in a brutal and sadistic manner, apparently enjoying it.

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment: Human Nature and the Power of Social Roles Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment (as well as Milgram’s obedience study) are absolutely fascinating. In fact, their studies are largely the reason why I became interested in pursing psychology as my major. I have seen numerous documentaries about the psychology of evil, as well as read many books and articles pertaining to this area. I find these types of social psychology studies enthralling because I have trouble wrapping my mind around the idea that normal people are capable of such heinous acts. Moreover, theses classic studies leave me constantly questioning whether or not I would have behaved in a similar fashion.

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

I decided to conduct my research on the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE). This study was conducted in August of 1971 by a psychology professor named Phillip Zimbardo. The bases of the study was to focus on the psychology of human behavior, more specifically psychological effects between prison guard and prisoner. The experiment was to last 2 weeks but only lasted 6 days, due to dangerous behavior between the guards and prisoners. Twenty-four people volunteer to participate in the study, out of this group, they were randomly selected to be either prisoner or prison guard.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study that took place at Stanford University in 1971. It studied the psychological effects of going to prison or becoming a prison guard. Researchers set out to find college students to participate and soon had many willing to take part. To begin, the students were separate into two groups, prisoners and prison guards. Philip Zimbardo, lead researcher and “prison superintendent” told the guards to take the experiment seriously and take on a real prison guard persona.

Read More
254 Words | 2 Pages

I found the Stanford Prison experiment to be very disturbing, especially in the context of the recent events involving police misconduct and brutality. I think the Stanford experiment demonstrates that people in positions of power that abuse that power are not necessarily predestined to abuse the power, but the position that they are in can encourage it. For example, nearly all police officers are required to go through an intense background and psychological exams to becomes police officers. However, as recent and past events have shown, police misconduct is a major issue. I think that this evidence demonstrates the need for more continuing education and monitoring to ensure that those who experience high stress situations (without proper

Read More
206 Words | 1 Pages

The experiment I chose to research was the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Zimbardo in 1971. Zimbardo wanted to figure out if the brutality in prison was due to the guards or the prisoners. He asked questions such as dose “…the institutional roles of guard and prisoner embitter and harden even compassionate people.” He wanted to know if the people that are within the prison system make the prison violent or dose the prison make these people violent. Zimbardo conducted in experiment where male college students volunteered to play prison in a makeshift prison in the basement of the Stanford phycology department.

Read More
826 Words | 4 Pages

For example, researchers are expected to protect participants from greater-than-usual harm or discomfort, including fear or embarrassment (Myers & DeWall 2019). Prisoners were told to do counts of pushups or jumping jacks and publicly insulted in front of other prisoners; they wore a single, loose nightgown with only a number–their new name– printed on it; they could even be sentenced to the hole, or solitary confinement, for up to an hour. Of course, these occurrences distinctly show the excessive cruelty the prisoners faced. At the time, there was very little regulation on research studies, but there is no doubt that these traumatic events affected the lives of participants, so Zimbardo faced no repercussions, but it is obvious that there was a severe level of negligence and malpractice on his part. Zimbardo had a responsibility as the ringleader of the study to keep everyone involved safe and stable, and he certainly failed to do so.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Stanford Prison Experiment review In order to understand the basic psychology of human aggression, Dr. Zimbardo conducted a research funded by the Office of Naval Research by transforming a basement of the Stanford University to a prison. The purpose of his study was to investigate the change of the people mind from normal to brutal because of the strict rule, regulation, role and social expectation in dehumanising situation such as the prison. He wanted to test his hypothesis, whether it is “dispositional”. For example, if the prisoners and guards did not change their behaviour to aggressive one, the hypothesis was accepted.

Read More
292 Words | 2 Pages

I figured the experiment was very informative about group thinking, conflict theory, and more. This gives us more insight of how people are influenced by others. So, at the end yes, the scientific community did overreact, and I think we should allow research such as this. Considering both Asch

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

I believe this experiment was ethical because it talked about specific behaviors and also morality. It also explained why people followed authority’s commands and it gave examples such as the Hitler’s regime which was the introduction of the experiment. I believe the experiment overall was good however I don’t think it was organized correctly. I honestly think pieces were all over all place and that the information was messy. I also noticed that multiple points were violated in this experiment.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

Handfuls of students at Stanford University were quick to respond to a seemingly innocuous newspaper advertisement for a job that promised to pay fifteen dollars a day, an attractive offer for broke college students. Of those who were interested, twenty-four males were selected and deemed mentally and physically healthy. Then, they were each assigned roles as prisoners or guards for a prison simulation held in the basement of Jordan Hall at their university. To most psychology students, this situation sounds quite familiar. Based on Phillip Zimbardo’s 1971 psychology experiment, the 2015 film, The Stanford Prison Experiment, provides a disturbing view into human nature and tendency.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study conducted to find out the effects of people assimilating into the roles that they are assigned as well as to find out the effects of imprisonment on the human psyche, even if it was only for a week. The people chosen to participate in the experiment were chosen very carefully; Zimbardo, the man who designed the experiment, made sure that the participants were healthy and had no psychological issues that would mar the results of the experiment or add too many confounding variables to the mix. He randomly split the participants into two groups, 9 guards and 9 prisoners with 3 alternates for each group making a total of 24 people. He kept them in a “prison” and allowed them to have full autonomy over what happened during the experiment.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment: A Journey Into Authoritarian Leadership Over the years, scientists, psychologists, and doctors have used social experiments to further their understanding of our surroundings. Social experiments are studies of the human mind and psyche through various environments. In this case, a social experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment is what opened new doors for the comprehension of human behavior, how we act when we are in power, as well as offered a glimpse into the flaws in our legal system. This experiment was conducted in 1971 in Palo Alto, California.

Read More

More about Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo

Related Topics

Open Document