ipl-logo

Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary

732 Words3 Pages

Summary
In this essay, I will discuss on Stanley Milgram Obedience Study. This research represents a procedure for destructive obedience study in the laboratory. The setup consisted a learner (confederate), a teacher (true participant), and an experimenter (high school biological instructor or teacher). It comprises instructing a naïve S in administering maximum severe punishments on the victim in learning experiment context. The punishment is administered through shock generator means with switches grading to 30 that range from Sight Shock to Severe Shock: danger. The victim is a n E confederate and the study is based on the maximum shock that S can give. Twenty-six Ss complied with the commands of the experiment fully along with administering maximum shocks on the given generator. Fourteen Ss cut off the experiment at some point when the victim refused and protested to give more answers. …show more content…

Subjects always showed deep, shocking disapproval his objection face, and others denounced the experiment terming it as senseless and stupid. Despite the denunciation from some subject, the majority had to compile with the commands.
The understanding of this phenomenon is that obedience rest of the particular conditions analysis that it occurs. While the experimenter demands have the scientific authority nature, the victim demands spring from his personal pain and suffering experience. In this position of obedience and the victim, suffering shows that the general conflict stems level are the two deeply ingrained dispositions of behavior. The study shows that the inhibiting factor power is more than the experienced stress. The study further stipulates that every situation is an ideology that interprets situation meaning. There is a propensity for individuals accepting action definitions given by legitimate

Show More
Related
406 Words | 2 Pages

Within 24 hours of the experiment, the prison guards began to humiliate and mentally abuse the prisoners. The prison guards were given little instructions about how to treat the prisoners, except that there was not to be any physical force used on the prisoners. The lack of instructions that

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

In the article of “The Perils of Obedience”, written by Stanley Milgram, the experimenter explains that the experiment is to see how far a person could hurt a victim in a situation where he is ordered to do so. Also, in the article “The Stanford Prison

Read More
187 Words | 1 Pages

The theme of "Hunter Safety" by Jeff Johnson is to not be conceited and over-exaggerate your abilities. " Plus, I 'm a good shot... Give me the trophy now..." "Dad says, his voice rising in tone, "missed him by a mile! ' " First, these quotes show that the narrator thinks he is an amazing hunter, but in reality, he 's average or below. "

Read More
1205 Words | 5 Pages

Switches were clearly labelled with voltage 15-450 volts. The teacher was actually naïve subject but Learner was an actor who didn’t even get a single shock. The purpose of this experiment was to see how far Teacher can go in the critical situation when shocks volts rise and Learner’s pain increased. Screaming and pain of the Learner made Teacher hesitating in proceeding far. To get freedom from this situation, Teacher must disobey to the

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

This relates back to Of Mice and Men because of how George was under the control and being told what to do by a higher power and he had to obey even if it meant hurting somebody. A news reporter for ABC tried this experiment. In this experiment, an actor was in a different room behind a wall and the person who the experimenters brought in was behind the other side of the wall with a box containing different voltages on it. The person who was brought in for the experiment was told if the person behind the wall answered a question wrong they would have to send an electric shock to the person.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Obedience is tested by how long the subject will continue to “shock the victim”. The point of this study is to determine if Americans are obedient even if they know the act is wrong. 2. What is/are the research questions and/or hypothesis/hypotheses? How obedient would subjects be to researchers when it comes to shocking a victim?

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.

Read More
1976 Words | 8 Pages

Milgram’s experiment displays how much was situated in a time and how his life affected his choices, and his experiments have gained notoriety. The discursive approach to attitudes builds on a criticism of key assumptions and methods of the cognitive social approach and highlights the limitations of the experimental method for developing a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon such as obedience. Through Gibson’s rhetorical analysis he highlighted the importance of the interaction between participant and experimenter which suggests that the standard view on experiments could do with revising. The experimental setting although it is great in most cases it can create a hostile environment with individuals acting out of character and therefore not creating the best results. Gibson has highlighted that the nervous anxious participants that were portrayed in the original papers were in fact passive and argumentative and that’s just by looking at it differently and examining different things such as the language people use to be persuasive.

Read More
1509 Words | 7 Pages

When the Milgram obedience experiments were being conducted the core of the experiments were all based on the false impression that an electrical shock would be administered to another individual at the push of a button with an incorrect answer, when in fact they weren’t. If the Milgram experiments were not based on lies and each participant did in fact administer a shock to another individual in response to a wrong answer, I feel that the results would have been the same with no alternative result. The reason for this would be because from the very beginning of the experiment the participants already believed that they would be actually administering an electrical shock. The participant’s reactions and concerns before, during and even after the experiments were all real with their true feelings and thoughts about their participation of either walking away from the experiment or completing the experiment. If the participants were to know that the electric shocks they were administering were not real, then the whole purpose of the experiment would have been useless and unnecessary.

Read More
1622 Words | 7 Pages

Subjects were told to shock a person who they believed to also be a subject if they answered a question wrong. The people getting shocked were actors and were not actually receiving electrical shocks. Many of the subjects continued to give high voltage shocks because they were told to. This experiment was viewed as unethical because of the emotional stress it put on the subjects.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

On day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

The Milgram experiment is an experiment which test the way people do terrible things because of orders they are given. The experiment consists of filming two people, one asks questions, the other is being asked a series of memory questions. The person who is asking the series of memory questions thinks he is being told what questions to ask by a “scientist”, the scientist is actually just an actor. The people are hooked up to a voltage machine that can give off anywhere to no voltage to the legal amount of voltage a human can be given. The “scientist” is instructed to increase the voltage each time the person gets a memory question wrong.

Read More
981 Words | 4 Pages

When the voltage gets even higher the learner starts exclaiming about his heart condition and that he does not want to continue. After this occurs the first participant is extremely put off that the learner is complaining about his heart and he refuses to go on. When the teacher is urged on repeatedly, he states that “it is not essential for him” and disassociates himself from the experimenter and experiment. This participant is now going against the Normative Social Influence, which refers to when individuals conform because of their need to be accepted. By disassociating himself and stressing that he did not care about the experiment, the participant rejected the need to be accepted because he did not agree with the experimenter’s

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Name : Muhammed Irshad Madonna ID : 250509 Subject : Medical Ethics Due Date : 8/01/2018 Paper : 1-The Milgram Experiment The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a famous study about obedience in psychology which has been carried out by a Psychologist at the Yale University named, Stanley Milgram. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. In July 1961 the experiment was started for researching that how long a person can harm another person by obeying an instructor.

Read More
2548 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Learning enables you as an individual, to gain more knowledge about something which you have never learned about. Learning also has to do with past experiences which are influenced by behavioural changes (Weiten, 2016). There are different types of ways to learn; through, classical conditioning, operant conditioning and observational learning which will be discussed and analysed in the essay.   Behaviourism Behaviourism is considered one of the main subjects in psychology and the two main people who founded behaviourism were, Burrhus Frederic Skinner, also known as B.F Skinner and Ivan Pavlov who were famous for the work they did on classical and operant conditioning (Moderato & Presti, 2006). According to Moderato and Presti

Read More

More about Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary

Related Topics

Open Document