ipl-logo

Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary

732 Words3 Pages

Summary
In this essay, I will discuss on Stanley Milgram Obedience Study. This research represents a procedure for destructive obedience study in the laboratory. The setup consisted a learner (confederate), a teacher (true participant), and an experimenter (high school biological instructor or teacher). It comprises instructing a naïve S in administering maximum severe punishments on the victim in learning experiment context. The punishment is administered through shock generator means with switches grading to 30 that range from Sight Shock to Severe Shock: danger. The victim is a n E confederate and the study is based on the maximum shock that S can give. Twenty-six Ss complied with the commands of the experiment fully along with administering maximum shocks on the given generator. Fourteen Ss cut off the experiment at some point when the victim refused and protested to give more answers. …show more content…

Subjects always showed deep, shocking disapproval his objection face, and others denounced the experiment terming it as senseless and stupid. Despite the denunciation from some subject, the majority had to compile with the commands.
The understanding of this phenomenon is that obedience rest of the particular conditions analysis that it occurs. While the experimenter demands have the scientific authority nature, the victim demands spring from his personal pain and suffering experience. In this position of obedience and the victim, suffering shows that the general conflict stems level are the two deeply ingrained dispositions of behavior. The study shows that the inhibiting factor power is more than the experienced stress. The study further stipulates that every situation is an ideology that interprets situation meaning. There is a propensity for individuals accepting action definitions given by legitimate

Show More
Related

  • Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    406 Words  | 2 Pages

    Within 24 hours of the experiment, the prison guards began to humiliate and mentally abuse the prisoners. The prison guards were given little instructions about how to treat the prisoners, except that there was not to be any physical force used on the prisoners. The lack of instructions that

    Read More

  • What Rationale Does The Author Give For Conducting The Study

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    Obedience is tested by how long the subject will continue to “shock the victim”. The point of this study is to determine if Americans are obedient even if they know the act is wrong. 2. What is/are the research questions and/or hypothesis/hypotheses? How obedient would subjects be to researchers when it comes to shocking a victim?

    Read More

  • William Gibson's Essay

    1976 Words  | 8 Pages

    Milgram’s experiment displays how much was situated in a time and how his life affected his choices, and his experiments have gained notoriety. The discursive approach to attitudes builds on a criticism of key assumptions and methods of the cognitive social approach and highlights the limitations of the experimental method for developing a comprehensive understanding of a phenomenon such as obedience. Through Gibson’s rhetorical analysis he highlighted the importance of the interaction between participant and experimenter which suggests that the standard view on experiments could do with revising. The experimental setting although it is great in most cases it can create a hostile environment with individuals acting out of character and therefore not creating the best results. Gibson has highlighted that the nervous anxious participants that were portrayed in the original papers were in fact passive and argumentative and that’s just by looking at it differently and examining different things such as the language people use to be persuasive.

    Read More

  • The Milgram Obedience Experiment: Logan Pratts

    927 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout the experiment, the teachers were told that there would be no permanent damage done by the shocks, and when the experiment was over they were asked to rate the pain of the last shock they administered on a scale from 0 to

    Read More

  • Why Is The Milgram Experiment Re-Created Today

    1509 Words  | 7 Pages

    When the Milgram obedience experiments were being conducted the core of the experiments were all based on the false impression that an electrical shock would be administered to another individual at the push of a button with an incorrect answer, when in fact they weren’t. If the Milgram experiments were not based on lies and each participant did in fact administer a shock to another individual in response to a wrong answer, I feel that the results would have been the same with no alternative result. The reason for this would be because from the very beginning of the experiment the participants already believed that they would be actually administering an electrical shock. The participant’s reactions and concerns before, during and even after the experiments were all real with their true feelings and thoughts about their participation of either walking away from the experiment or completing the experiment. If the participants were to know that the electric shocks they were administering were not real, then the whole purpose of the experiment would have been useless and unnecessary.

    Read More

  • Stanley Milgram's Use Of Deception In Civil Disobedience

    832 Words  | 4 Pages

    Then, the participants were fully debriefed about the situation and how no physical harm was inflicted. Generally, “the obedience experiments produced a disturbing view of human behavior” (Blass, Print). The procedure heavily relied on the experimenter because the participant, upon instinct, chose to turn to them when in doubt or when showing nervousness. They were always commanded to continue the

    Read More

  • What Guideline Did They Violate?

    1622 Words  | 7 Pages

    Subjects were told to shock a person who they believed to also be a subject if they answered a question wrong. The people getting shocked were actors and were not actually receiving electrical shocks. Many of the subjects continued to give high voltage shocks because they were told to. This experiment was viewed as unethical because of the emotional stress it put on the subjects.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo

    1874 Words  | 8 Pages

    The method chosen for conducting such an experiment was to construct a fake correctional facility in the basement of Stanford University. To be in the experiment, Zimbardo offered participants $15 dollars a day for up to two weeks. They selected 24 of the most mentally and physically stable subjects. They were divided evenly and randomly in two groups: guards and prisoners. The guards were given uniforms similar military clothing, wooden batons, whistles, and mirrored shades.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    Since the beginning of the human existence, man has always dominated and ruled over one another be it empires, corporations, or small groups. Authority and obedience has always been a factor of who we are. This natural occurrence can be seen clearly through the psychological experiments known as The Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. Both of these studies are based on how human beings react to authority figures and what their obedience is when faced with conflict.

    Read More

  • Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment

    599 Words  | 3 Pages

    On day six Zimbardo and Milgram decided to conclude the experiment. Zimbardo originally intended to explore how prisoners adapt to powerlessness, but he has contended that the experiment demonstrates how swiftly arbitrary assignment of power can lead to abuse. (Maher, The anatomy of obedience. P. 408) Once the experiment was completed Zimbardo and Milgram concluded that generally people will conform to the roles they are told to play.

    Read More

  • The Milgram Experiment Essay

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the voltage gets even higher the learner starts exclaiming about his heart condition and that he does not want to continue. After this occurs the first participant is extremely put off that the learner is complaining about his heart and he refuses to go on. When the teacher is urged on repeatedly, he states that “it is not essential for him” and disassociates himself from the experimenter and experiment. This participant is now going against the Normative Social Influence, which refers to when individuals conform because of their need to be accepted. By disassociating himself and stressing that he did not care about the experiment, the participant rejected the need to be accepted because he did not agree with the experimenter’s

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment Vs A Few Good Men

    983 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the article of “The Perils of Obedience”, written by Stanley Milgram, the experimenter explains that the experiment is to see how far a person could hurt a victim in a situation where he is ordered to do so. Also, in the article “The Stanford Prison

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Perils Of Obedience By Stanley Milgram

    1205 Words  | 5 Pages

    Switches were clearly labelled with voltage 15-450 volts. The teacher was actually naïve subject but Learner was an actor who didn’t even get a single shock. The purpose of this experiment was to see how far Teacher can go in the critical situation when shocks volts rise and Learner’s pain increased. Screaming and pain of the Learner made Teacher hesitating in proceeding far. To get freedom from this situation, Teacher must disobey to the

    Read More

  • Chapter Summary Of The Book 'Opening Skinner's Box'

    708 Words  | 3 Pages

    There had been experimentation on obedience but none had been done like Milgram’s. The experimenter warns, “In this experiment, one of you will be the learner and receive shocks when you make a mistake in word pairs read to you, and the other one will be the teacher and administer the shocks when the word pair repetition is wrong.” (Slater 33). He wanted to see if people would shock a person continuously because someone had told them to. Milgram wanted to know how far people would go.

    Read More

  • Classical Conditioning And Observational Learning Analysis

    2548 Words  | 11 Pages

    Introduction Learning enables you as an individual, to gain more knowledge about something which you have never learned about. Learning also has to do with past experiences which are influenced by behavioural changes (Weiten, 2016). There are different types of ways to learn; through, classical conditioning, operant conditioning and observational learning which will be discussed and analysed in the essay.   Behaviourism Behaviourism is considered one of the main subjects in psychology and the two main people who founded behaviourism were, Burrhus Frederic Skinner, also known as B.F Skinner and Ivan Pavlov who were famous for the work they did on classical and operant conditioning (Moderato & Presti, 2006). According to Moderato and Presti

    Read More

More about Stanley Milgram Experiment Summary

Open Document