If you fail to pay by the specified date, eviction proceedings can be
GENB 4350 Assignment 1 Not even three months ago did I have a massive moral quandary in which I had to choose between saving my dog’s life or letting him suffer for the rest of his life. Last year my dog, Milo, suddenly required surgery because of a ruptured disk in his back. At any given time would he go into fits of screaming. This would happen when he was moved in a way that hurt his back. It was hard to watch him cry out in a way I had never heard him before.
Julian wants to sue David, the other player. In his complaint, which tort theory is Julian’s attorney most likely to allege and what will he have to prove for Julian to be successful? Julian’s attorney is most likely to allege Intentional Tort for his complaint to be successful. An intentional tort occurs whenever someone intends an action that results in harm to a person’s body, reputation, emotional well-being, or property. During the game David kicked Julian in the head while Julian was in possession on the ball.
Idaho statute, Title 18 Crimes and Punishments, Chapter 15 Children and Vulnerable Adults, Section 1 Injury to Children (18-1501), states that any person who, under circumstances or conditions likely to produce great bodily harm or death, willfully causes or permits any child to suffer, or inflicts thereon unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering (Idaho Legislature 2014). If a person is over the age of 18 years old and commits a crime of injury to a child if the person transports a minor in a vehicle as defined in section 67-7003, Idaho Code, while under the influence of a controlled substance, or any combination thereof, in violation of section 18-8004 or 67-7034, Idaho Code. The punishment would be a felony under the law and could
Manufacturing Guilt Wrongful Convictions in Canada, Second Edition, is relevant to the course I am taking Social Inequity and Justice because, like my course this book discusses and examines sociological approaches to social inequity in regard to race and ethnicity and how it effects these groups and their lives. Manufacturing Guilt Wrongful Convictions in Canada, Second Edition is about innocent people that spend many years behind bars, wrongfully committed for crimes they did not commit. When someone is wrongfully convicted, they are being punished for an offence they did not commit and to make matters worse the actual perpetrator of the crime goes free. Many people that do get exonerated their applications take years in the federal review
The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute is a criminal law that prohibits the knowing and willful payment of direct or indirect “remuneration”, to induce or reward patient referrals or the generation of business that involves any service or items payable by the Federal health care programs (e.g., drugs, supplies, or health care services for Medicare or Medicaid patients).[1] Remuneration can incorporate anything of value and can be of any form other than cash, for example travel tours, expenses for lavish hotel stays or immoderate compensation for medical consultations or referrals. In some industries, it is allowed to give compensation or reward to those who refer business. But, in the health care, referral is a
A Never Ending Sea of Debt In “Student Debt” on HBO’s Last Week Tonight, John Oliver discusses how awful student debt has become for college students nationwide. In a humorous way, Oliver’s segment on the student loan crisis in America reveals the truth about many for-profit schools, as well as their substantial costs, how they manage their money, and their recruitment processes. Stating some of the leading causes of debt in America, like credit card debt and auto loans, Oliver argues that student loans are a “special kind of debt” that reached over $1 Trillion as of 2012 (1). Oliver supports his claim by pointing out that student loans are inescapable and are the most collectable type of debt; resulting in garnished wages, being non
What if there was a law that could minimize, even stop all mass shootings eventually? “Laura’s Law was named for 19-year-old Laura Wilcox, who was killed in 2001 by a psychiatric client at a clinic in Nevada City. The state passed Laura’s Law in 2002 but left it up to counties to choose to implement it. For a while, only Nevada County did” (Dembosky 2). Laura’s death affected many, causing people to feel obligated to stop it from happening to anyone else.
Finally, my last suggestion would be to alter the labels of ex-felonies for minor violations, and changing how to use the criminal check box. Once an ex-convict paid for their time in prison for inferior crimes we should not label then as a felon, so that they can apply for jobs and do not have to check on the felony box when applying for a job. Consequently, ex-convict could get a better chance to be hired, so that they truly have a chance to readjust in the society. People that who are labeled as a felon have a hard time applying for jobs, housings, and getting food stamps, making it impossible to survive and to provide for their family. They can lose their kids, their home, and become homeless and in other cases going back to jail.
Bankruptcy is a financial remedy reserved for frantic situations. Student loans are the only form of consumer debt which have considerably different bankruptcy rules. Before 1978, any student loan debt , whether it was private student loans or federally funded loan, was dischargeable in bankruptcy, without any exceptions. Eventually in 2005, a new law was passed to avoid almost 100% of private student loans from qualifying for bankruptcy discharge. Student loans are generally non-dischargeable in bankruptcy.
There are a number of reasons that someone may need the help of a criminal defense lawyer. A good one is not cheap, but a conviction on your record can cost you over and over for the rest of your life. First of all are the very real possibilities of large fines and time behind bars. However, even misdemeanor convictions can keep you from getting a good job. Although many potential employers will tell you that they will only check back through 7 years of your criminal history, that is largely a myth.
This generally happens within two days. The judge weighs the seriousness of alleged crime. The judge also
The biggest issue within the Criminal Justice system is the large number of wrongful convictions, innocent people sentenced to die for crimes they did not commit. People are put in prison for years, even executed for false convictions. This affects not only those put in prison but friends and family of the accused. Wrongful convictions aren’t solely a tragedy for those directly involved either. It weakens the faith the public has for the justice system as well as poses safety issues; when innocent people are put away, the real criminals are still out there.
Is your first instinct to say one with a criminal conviction should never be a teacher? Why or Why Not? Discuss. I personally feel a person who holds a criminal background should be able to be a teacher under the following conditions: criminal conviction was due to a minor infraction, the quantity of convictions is minimal, and the conviction did not occur recently. Minor infractions can included the following: drug possession, petty theft, and driving under the influence (DUI).
Introduction: If there is anything which has always existed, it is crime. Crime has existed for centuries and it is something we can never avoid. But the most important and concerning question is, does the fact that someone of a certain age affect their responsibility for an offence committed and are they liable for punishment? Or should there be a certain age limit where a person could be held responsible for a crime that someone commits?