ipl-logo

Stem Cells Pros And Cons Essay

1426 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Embryonic stem cell ethics debate sides

Overview I got interested in stem cells after hearing about how much they can help people. They have been in the news for years. These cells can possibly cure thought to be incurable diseases. They can help spinal injuries, cancer, and more. Although I have no personal experience, I do know of people who have been impacted and after years of struggling with their diseases have passed away from Parkinson’s and cancer, both which possibly could be cured with stem cells. There are many reasons why people are against stem cell treatments. Some argue the pro-life, anti-abortion movement and the killing of embryos. However, there are new ways to re-program adult stem cells into the correct type of stem cells. Others argue the cost of the procedures. …show more content…

Embryonic stem cells are easier to modify than adult stem cells (Kuhn). Because they are harvested shortly after conception, they are easier to grow.
Many states have legislation in place that follows three main ideas: prohibiting human cloning, regarding cloning that includes research and regarding research on embryos and fetuses that may affect the performance of the research (Acosta). President Bush vetoed a bill in 2006 that would expand Embryonic Stem Cell Research. As of now, the only stem cells that are allowed for research are those that have already been destroyed (Acosta).
Many believe that stem cells research is an ethical question that should be put to rest along with the treatment of incurable or untreatable diseases, because it is an attempt to play God. However, the ability to find cures and treatments for diseases and genetic conditions that have been deemed untreatable is a chance to allow for an overall improvement in our standard of living for those in the United States as well as around the world. The price of these treatments may be high and deemed experimental and controversial, however, it truly is an area where the positives outweigh the

Show More
Related
1024 Words | 5 Pages

This is because embryonic stem cells are a type of unspecialized cell, so they can form into any type of cell. As Junying Yu and James A. Thomson say in their article about Embryonic Stem Cells, “human [embryonic stem cells] promise an essentially unlimited supply of specific cell types. . . for transplantation therapies for diseases” (Thomson). This explains that this course of treatment would allow not only the treatment of, but possibly even a cure for, diseases that are caused by either malfunctioning cells or the loss of them.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

For these reasons, embryonic stem cell research should be discouraged. According to the National Institutes of

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

The major replacement of taking embryonic stem cells is sacrificing already developed adult stem cells.(Right to Life of Michigan, 2016) The stem cells of adults can be easily conformed to the selected research requirements. Abnormalities in adult stem cells are less likely than embryonic stem cells to regenerate in the research being performed.(Stem Cell Controversy,2016) Another option is an altered nuclear transfer (ANT); which an embryo is not created and any other cell except for the egg cell can be genetically altered and transferred back into the female egg.(Stem Cell Controversy, 2016)This activity does not require harming an actual human embryo for the means of the medical research. Additionally, a blastomere extraction can be accomplished on the fertilized egg at two days old; in which, the mundane embryo endures division between the cell and egg eliminating full devastation.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

Embryonic stem cell transplants have been an ethical, social, and legal controversy since the first successful transplant of human stem cells in 1998. The controversy slowed down the pace of any advancements in the life saving technique. Stem cell transplant controversy falls into the same category as abortion and whether someone is pro-life or pro-choice because of the way the cells are derived from human embryos. The use embryonic stems cells have been saving lives since the late 90s, so the discontinuation of this research would be the greatest mistake ever made. Imagine a child sick with an aggressive cancer that is close to ending the child’s life.

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

As mentioned before, the benefits of stem cells could be used to treat a myriad of different health complications that a major portion of the population in the world faces today. If the treatment of disease were explored through the research of stem cells, the quality of life for those impacted by the multitude of health problems that exist would vastly improve. In Franklin Roosevelt’s second Bill of Rights, he lists “self-evident” economic rights that every person in the nation should have, despite their

Read More
1402 Words | 6 Pages

It is true that there are alternatives. Scientists have derived stem cells from patients’ bone marrow, from their skin, and even made their own lab-grown stem cells. There are issues with these alternatives, however. Gathering stem cells from these methods are either expensive, inefficient, intrusive to the patient, or any combination of the three. To this day, embryos remain the most effective method of obtaining stem cells, in terms of both yield and cost.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

Stem-Cell research has proven to be very helpful in today’s medical scene, treating and curing disease and illness that are otherwise fatal. Recent cases that have had a child or adult in need of a vital transplant, or treatment, in order to perform daily procedures have been cured with a form of Stem-Cell. Although embryonic stem cell research is a big part of experimenting with stem-cells, it is not the only form of stem-cell treatment. There are many different ways of gathering, transplanting, and even producing stem-cells. Stem-cells show many hope for their health, and ridding them of the conditions that have been a burden, however to others it could be a moral issue, or be against their religion to experiment on unborn children.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

Many people argue that the embryo dies from this, which is why I thought I was going to be against this. But, there ways that stem cell research can be done without killing embryos. Also, the research from this could potentially lead to the cure of cancer which would save millions of lives. One of the biggest

Read More
1596 Words | 7 Pages

While this seems to be a logical argument, the argument can be negated by the implementation of strict regulations governing the creation of embryos in the in vitro fertilization process. Shannon says, "The human embryo ... is not to be destroyed or seen as disposable tissue that can be used in research" (SHANNON). However, the use of the embryo only happens if the parents of the created embryo for in vitro fertilization purposes are no longer willing to pay for the storage of embryos because they no longer need them. The parents of the embryo can choose to donate them to research and must give consent and sign various forms before scientist can do research. If the parent does not donate them, the clinic will destroy the

Read More
1440 Words | 6 Pages

Though technology at some point will likely make this possible, “human cloning is scientifically distant at best” and “the scientific community has universally condemned it” (Acost and Golub 429). Without the support of the possible creators of this technology, there is no way that this would ever come about, and it remains irrelevant to the known information about the benefits stem cell research would have on the world of healing medicine. At the center of the controversy lies politics and the continuous battle between being supportive of the research and respecting the beliefs of American groups. Starting in 1995, legislation took on the topic of stem cell research by creating the Dickey-Wicker Amendment.

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Is it ethical to conduct stem cell therapy at this early stage? Introduction: Stem cell is found in the early stage of the embryo. During early life and growth of the body stem cells have the incredible potential to develop into many different cell types. Embryonic stem cells can differentiate from somatic stem cells due to its potentiality of embryonic stem cells developing into many different cell types where as somatic stem cells doesn’t (Stemcells.nih.gov, 2015).

Read More
1081 Words | 5 Pages

Q:I've heard many opinions in regards to newborns and pacifiers. Is it OK to give one, and if so, at what age? A: All babies have a natural desire to suck and pacifiers can often be great tools to aid them. When used properly, pacifiers can help comfort a baby or simply give him the opportunity to suck when he is not actually hungry.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

The use of embryonic stem cells for medical treatment or scientific research is considered one of bioethics greatest controversies. Since the discovery of the uses of embryonic stem in 1981, people have argued that that embryonic stem cell research pushes the bounds of humane ethics. Conversely, others argue that the use of embryonic stem cells follow the principle tenets of bioethics: maximize benefits and minimize harm. Following their discovery, methods to remove embryonic stem cells from humans was discovered in 1998. Shortly after, In 2001, President George W. Bush granted federal funding to the research of hECS.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

Not all of the stem cells are controversial. Mostly the only one that people don’t approve of is the Embryonic Stem cell transplant. Embryonic Stem Cell Research is when scientist take cells from aborted fetuses or fertilized eggs and use then for medical research purposes. This causes controversy because it is against most people 's religion to get abortions. Even if it not against their religion, some people still do not like the idea of taking stem cells from aborted babies and putting them into sick people.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

Many people view this as destroying a potential for life to futher scientific research and knowledge. A lot of the opposition to stem cell research comes from the moral belief that human life begins at conception and some see it that destroying an embryo for medical research or even to treat another human is morally the same as killing a human child or adult for research. Many people with these views are strongly religious Roman Catholics or Orthodox

Read More

More about Stem Cells Pros And Cons Essay

Related Topics

Open Document