More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of monsters in literature
An essay on depiction of monsters in literature
Mistakes steve harmon did that led him to be place in trial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Innocent Until Proven Guilty Steve Harmon, the young teen and narrator in Monster was on trial for felony murder. This innocent sixteen year old was accused of being an accomplice in the robbery and death of Mr. Nesbitt. His supposed job was to be a look out for the criminals Bobo and King. Prior to them entering Mr. Nesbitts drugstore robbing and killing him in cold blood. Although there are some that doubt his innocence the verdict of Steve’s future was rightfully not guilty.
Addison Lucas Mrs.A/Mr.G English 10 23 February 2023 Monster Monster is a novel written by Walter Myers,this story is based on Steve Harmon, a teenager who finds himself in a difficult situation as he is on trial for murder. While some people believe that Steve Harmon was not guilty, in reality, he was guilty because he had to be trained by O’Brien, he was at the drugstore during the crime, and he changed his story. The first reason why Steve is guilty is becasue he had to be trained by his defense attorney, Kathy O’brien. ”We’re going to play a little game.
Robberies, signals,court,trust and even Murder makes up Monster by Walter Dean Myers. Without a doubt, One's opinion cannot be manipulated by results. Throughout the story of Monster Steve Harmon is put on trial for involvement in felony murder. Later on, he is proven not guilty. Although the results of the court stated him as not guilty his own defendant’ opinion did not change.
Everyone is guilty of something in their lifetime. But the question is what are they guilty of? In a quiet neighborhood on the 22nd of December a family man was gruesomely murdered in a the local drug store. A boy named Steve Harmon and his acquaintances went to the drugstore to rob it, in which case led to Mr. Nesbitt being killed. This brutal and gruesome murder took place in a book called Monster by Walter Dean Myers.
Calling someone a monster is very ignominious and can hurt and can demote a person’s feelings. Steve Harmon was an innocent teenager. But he is not; he is a monster in the novel by Walter Dean Myers called Monster. Steve is called monster several times. His family and his lawyer don’t even know who he is anymore.
Steve Harmon, a fifteen year old , was charged with robbery and murder but did not do it. As a member of the film club, Steve Harmon is charged with these offenses in the novel Monster. The owner of a drug store was shot and killed, and Harmon is being investigated. However, he is innocent because the state's witnesses are untrustworthy, there is no evidence he was present, and he never finished his claimed assignment. All of this demonstrates that Steve Harmon is not guilty.
Steve Harmon is not guilty. There are many reason to support as to why that statement is true. The crime that took place on the 22 of December was a crime that Steve Harmon was not involved in. As a member of the jury, the law states that one has to acknowledge that Steve Harmon is innocent until proven guilty. One of the prosecution witnesses, Lorelle Henry, provides evidence that supports Steve’s innocence.
The truth is really not what one might think. In the novel, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, there is a young man named Steve Harmon is on trial for felony murder and robbery. King and Bobo said that Harmon was the person that went inside to check if there was anyone in there. That was Kings and Bobos truth because they made themselves think that Harmon was part of the robbery. But there was no actual proof because King and Bobo are two criminals and they just might want to lighten their sentences.
His actions are heinous. Monster is a label Steve wants to distance himself from. The title Monster is significant because it represents the evil of murder and the theme of the book. It shows that if one man is capable of killing another in cold blood, then he is not a human but rather a monster.
Talking about basketball in the streets of Harlem? Does that now constitute a crime? Not in any law journal that I know about” (246). Be that as it may, the distance between Steve and King was already established prior to this moment. However, O’Brien attempts to prove Steve innocent by saying the only thing Steve did was, in correlation the robbery, talk to King about basketball.
From a death in the family to receiving a bad grade on a test, although different, every day people go through challenges. The difference between these people though, is how they choose to tackle these problems. Some choose to talk to their acquaintances, while others choose to keep it to themselves--it is just a preference. In Monster by Walter Dean Myers one of the characters is on trial for felony murder. This sixteen year old’s name is Steve Harmon and he chooses to write about his challenges.
Many times in life, people are accused of actions that were not theirs. They must go through a series of events to prove this action wrong and abhorrent. In the novel, Monster, written by Walter Dean Myers, Steve, a sixteen-year-old boy, young and confused, has been placed on trial accused of felony murder. As the jury looked into this case, they came to the conclusion Steve was not guilty. Many factors led to the conclusion of Steve being proven not guilty.
A 16 year old is on trial for a murder and he could receive 25 years to life in prison. I could tell you that he is guilty or not guilty, but you have to decide whether he is guilty or innocent with the evidence I provide to you. A 16 year old African- American, Steve Harmon, is guilty of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Steve Harmon is on trial for the murder of 55 year old Aguinaldo Nesbitt and Steve could possibly receive 25 years to life in prison. Steve said he did not kill Mr. Nesbitt.
The book ended ambiguously and left the reader to question whether or not Steve was truly innocent. Because of the numerous questionable scenes/parts in the novel, I believe that Steve Harmon is guilty of being a participant in the crime that led to death of Mr. Nesbitt. Would a man who was innocent continuously change his story? Steve’s statements regarding his whereabouts and what he was doing on the day of the murder is inconsistent. Steve stated that he just went inside
My first impression when I was reading the book is that the environment in which one lives in can influence our decisions. The book describes Steve in general as a good guy from a harsh environment that has molded him poorly. Steve is a 16-year-old from the ghetto, and as one from the ghetto, he believes that surviving on the streets requires working on the side of the gang, not against it. Therefore, as a result, he has lived his young life doing jobs for the gang that has gotten him involved in small crimes, drug usage, and other poor choices. However, Myers' story shows it is clear Steve has made bad choices as a product of his environment and one can argue if Steve is "evil" because he has done these crimes as a result of his environment
