Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of using dna in court
The cons of using dna in crimiNAL COURT
Case study on legal issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Innocent Until Proven Guilty Steve Harmon, the young teen and narrator in Monster was on trial for felony murder. This innocent sixteen year old was accused of being an accomplice in the robbery and death of Mr. Nesbitt. His supposed job was to be a look out for the criminals Bobo and King. Prior to them entering Mr. Nesbitts drugstore robbing and killing him in cold blood. Although there are some that doubt his innocence the verdict of Steve’s future was rightfully not guilty.
I believe that Steve Harmon is innocent. There are many reasons to believe this. For one “bobo” Evans placed him at the crime scene but Mr. Evans and Mr. King according to Mr. Evans testimony were on drugs. So Steve Harmon could have just happened to be their. Since both Mr. Evans and Mr. King were on drugs i don’t believe that their statements are valid.
Many people today get involved with the wrong people, as a result, many people are wrongly accused and incarcerated for crimes they didn’t commit. In the book MONSTER, there is a witness named Steve, who is on trial for the murder of a drugstore owner. Steve was the lookout in the robbery, however, he was not responsible for Mr. Nesbitt’s death. First of all, Steve was the lookout because he planned the robbery with James King.
The main reason that I believe Steve Harmon was found not guilty is because there was a lack of evidence showing that Steve actually did something. The jury is told that Steve was supposed to be the lookout and give a signal, but even Evans confirms that Steve gave no such signal. The fact that Steve received no portion of the robbery money is also solid evidence that even the criminals did not think that Steve played any part in the robbery.
January 7, 2016 Nancy started out explaining that she isn 't the only one who thinks Steven is guilty and that a jury thinks the same thing.
Mr. David Eldridge is guilty because there is no sound evidence. A strong piece of evidence presented was that Mr Eldridge had in his possession the stolen spatula with Mr Arm’s blood on it. Also, police noted that a spatula had been stolen from Mr Arms by Mr Eldridge and was never returned. But, it was then found in Mr Eldridge’s house with his fingerprints along with Mr Arms’s blood on it. Then, the police reported that Mr Arms had bled from a cut along his neck from a metal spatula.
Elianah Vazquez Mrs. Juhas 1/2 2-10-23 Good What is a good person? Steve Harmon is on trial for robbery, and murder.
I wonder if Steve knew if a murder was gonna happen if he would've been a part of it? Steve lives in New York City, and he is 16 years old. He was on trial for murder and robbery. In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon was a good person because he cares for others, and also because not guilty. Steve was a good person because he isn’t guilty.
A 16 year old is on trial for a murder and he could receive 25 years to life in prison. I could tell you that he is guilty or not guilty, but you have to decide whether he is guilty or innocent with the evidence I provide to you. A 16 year old African- American, Steve Harmon, is guilty of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt. Steve Harmon is on trial for the murder of 55 year old Aguinaldo Nesbitt and Steve could possibly receive 25 years to life in prison. Steve said he did not kill Mr. Nesbitt.
So, it wouldn’t make sense if Steve was inside the store with them as his job was already done. Make your community a safer place to live for yourself and others by making smart decisions and choosing friends or anyone you associate with,
The state's most compelling evidence is that of the coat, they found evidence of Mr. Rodgers DNA on the bottom of the coat. The problem with this is that the defense proved the point that if he had murdered Mr. Rodgers, then blood would have been all over the jacket, which there wasn’t. Equally important to point out is that they should have searched for shoes, and pants when they scoured his house. Considering they both should have had blood residue or particulates on them. They stated that he could have taken the jacket off, but it’s a suspicion.
Scott Peterson was convicted of the murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn son, Conner Peterson. He has been on death row for over a decade as he tries to get his conviction appealed. Peterson and his family maintain his innocence, even participating in a docu-series titled, The Murder of Laci Peterson. This has caused quite a stir among viewers who now say they have doubts about his guilt. Could Scott Peterson been wrongfully imprisoned for so long because of circumstances he had no control over?
Perceptions from others can be cruel. Criminals are often thought of negatively by themselves and are also disrespected by others in society. The novel Monster presents the impressions people have about Steve Harmon, an accused criminal on trial for robbery and murder. Furthermore, the text explains Steve’s views of himself during and after time in prison from first person point-of-view. The novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers highlights the various perceptions that exist about an accused criminal.
He depends on others to bring clarity to his mind, such as saying, “What did I do?”. After the session at court was finished, Steve was insecure about what Ms. O’Brien, his lawyer, thinks of him. He writes an entry about it: “Who was Steve Harmon? I wanted to open my shirt and tell her to look into my heart to see who I was, who the real Steve Harmon”(92). During the trial, Ms. O’Brien stays distant from him.
“Don 't be afraid of losing people. Be afraid of losing yourself by trying to please everyone around you. "~ Lewis Howes. In the novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers, we are introduced to Steve Harmon, a sixteen-year-old dark-skinned boy who is the narrator of the book.