ipl-logo

Strangers On A Train Morality

1249 Words5 Pages

Alfred Hitchcock’s Strangers on a Train confronts the concept of morality through the use of two seemingly different characters, Bruno and Guy. In the beginning, Bruno and Guy appear to be simplistically presented as contrasting individuals. Bruno being an insane murderous maniac, and Guy representing justice, fairness and an overall character of virtue. During the scene in which Bruno reveals to Guy that he had murdered his wife, Guy’s character begins to unravel. Hitchcock utilizes the use of light, camera angles and shadows to distort and cast doubt on who represents evil, and who represents good instead of direct dialogue in order to satisfy the MPPDA while still implementing a key literary theme of Patricia Highsmith’s Strangers on a Train.
This film adaptation of Strangers on a Train makes a direct distinction of who represents good (Guy) and who represents …show more content…

Guy is shot at a low, oblique angle, foreshadowing a psychological uneasiness. This angle is an aid in illustrating Guy’s exit from his expected, typical and virtuous character. It seems as though this exit only remains within this sequence amongst a few others throughout the film, as the ending of the film completely bypasses Patricia Highsmith’s overall theme of Strangers on a Train.
In Hitchcock’s adaptation, Guy’s innocence is proven at the end of the film, and Bruno dies. This typical ending satisfies the MPPDA’s standard. Goodness prevails, and evil is defeated. In Highsmith’s novel, Guy actually ends up following through with Bruno’s plan, and murder’s Bruno’s father. Throughout the novel, it is slowly seen how Guy begins to cross from the side of good, into the side of evil. The killing of Bruno’s father is the final deed that confirms Guy’s shift to evil. Further, it asks the reader to consider that everyone is capable of committing evil, and that evil resides in

Show More
Related
156 Words | 1 Pages

There is a central question that Connell develops throught the story that makes the audience think, are people born good or bad? The follow-up question to this that follows the them and plot is if all people are

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

Guy asked Lili “How do you think a man is judged after he's gone?” and then discovered the answer when he thought about his father and childhood. Guy says, “I know because I remember my father, who was a very poor struggling man all his life. I remember him as a man that I would never want to be” (Danticat 237). Once Guy realizes he will be remembered the same way his father

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

Not long before Guy jumped out of the hot air balloon; he had asked Lili what was her idea of how a man should be judged after he’s gone. She stated “A man is judged by his deeds, the boy never goes to bed hungry. For as long as he’s been with us, he’s always been fed.” Later in the story, Guy stated that he now knew the answer to the question that he had asked Lili, “How is a man remembered after he’s gone?” His answer was “I know because I remember my father who was a very poor struggling man all his life.

Read More
1243 Words | 5 Pages

(Bradbury 82). Mildred is very controlled by the dystopian society, and conforms to the laws. This is a rift in the relationship because Guy is not as controlled by society as much as Mildred is. Guy asked Mildred a big sacrifice from her that can jeopardize the relationship:“You must help me” ,“I’ve never asked for much from you in all these years, but I ask it now, I plead for it” (Bradbury 81).

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

This paper will discuss the motif of the double in Strangers on a Train. While the double is a recurring motif in Hitchcock’s work that he routinely employs in order to explore questions of moral responsibility, identity, and guilt, it receives its most overt and thorough treatment in Strangers on a Train. Studies of the film have consistently understood Bruno as a stand in for Guy’s unspoken desire, the chaos held at bay by societal order - Guy does indeed want to ‘get rid of’ his wife, but he transfers this responsibility (and associated guilt) to Bruno (Walker; Wood; Dellolio; Truffaut). As Walker notes, in Hitchcock’s films, the double most often serves as an ‘alter ego’ that enacts the repressed/disavowed/unpermitted desires of another character. Indeed, as Walker points out, There is little ambiguity that this is precisely what Hitchcock meant to communicate in the film, as he has formally stated this in correspondence with Francois Truffaut:

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Hitchcock's perspective to the attitudes of the characters in Rear Window also

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Next Guy Monatg kills Captain Beatty. This is an important part in the story because Monatg kills him for the benefit of society. He knew that the society could not properly function with him still living and controlling everything. Monatg claimed “________”. This proves that he was fighting for justice for the society because he knew with Beatty alive nothing would change and the town would be stuck in an endless loop of not producing their own thoughts.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

In Lord of the Flies, a group of British boys ended up stranded on a deserted island after their plane crashed. After establishing Ralph as the leader of the boys, he attempts to establish order by assigning roles to everyone and a system in which the holder of the conch may speak during an assembly. However, Jack, the antithesis to Ralph, sets up a hunting culture and disregards the use of the conch, preferring to speak openly, and sets up an authoritarian rule. In both of these groups, both establish right or wrong based on what is deemed beneficial to either Ralph or Jack. While Ralph seeks to uphold democratic values, opting to minimize the amount of time on the island, Jack looks for a more permanent solution through brutality and total power.

Read More
1437 Words | 6 Pages

An individual's morals and beliefs are developed with age through all the experiences one will encounter in their lifetime, though they can be pushed aside when the need to conform with the majority is more prominent. Authenticity is integral to living an honest life and making good decisions. However, individuality becomes difficult to maintain with pressure from others. Because of this, the need to maintain balance between authenticity to one's principles and ethics and conforming to the majority's standard is prevalent in the human race. In the novel ‘The 57 Bus’ author Dashka Slater tells the true story of two teenagers who encounter a crime on the bus as the victim, Sasha, and the perpetrator, Richard.

Read More
1132 Words | 5 Pages

The idea of similarities among all people, an underlying connection, is expressed by Hitchcock when Lisa in Rear Window argues with Jefferies, saying, “There can't be that much difference between people and the way they live! We all eat, talk, drink, laugh, sleep, wear clothes --“. When she says this, Lisa has a lamp light shining from the upper right side of the screen to indicate the truth of her argument. There is also an instance in Rear Window where the ability to understand a person sprouts empathy. Jefferies is sitting in the dark, after Lisa leaves angry, when the piano man comes home.

Read More
1354 Words | 6 Pages

The old western films’ solid black and white boundaries between good and evil characters are no longer relatable in a time where most members of society fall into the grey. The unique morality in No Country For Old Men is representative of the constant changes in modern day society and the adjustments in the moral standards of society that accompany those

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

No life is more important than others. All lives are are equal, no one is worth more money than another, and age does not matter. This all leads up to a big conclusion which is the value of human life. My first reason is that all lives are equal.

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

To the unknown eye, Hitchcock has carefully and skillfully used Mise-en-scene to his advantage, causing the audience to feel fear and a sense of caution towards the character of Norman Bates. It isn’t until we reflect back on the scene and notice how intelligently Hitchcock uses the positioning of props and the characters, lighting, camera angle and staging, that we notice how he has added meaning to his characters but has also to the film, creating suspense and fear from one scene to the end of the film. Ultimately proving the point that Hitchcock “the master of suspense” uses Mise-en-scene to not only help make a brilliant film but also uses it as his disposal to add meaning in his

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Rosemary's Baby, Guy is the character that brings out the most empathy but also the most fear out of all the characters. Guy in Rosemary’s Baby is the character that most people can feel empathy for because he puts himself above other characters. Most people that have wealth, fame and power have caused others to fail or thrown someone under the bus to gain the status they have today. That is the reason why we can feel empathy for him because he is only trying to make it in the world

Read More
1603 Words | 7 Pages

Philosophy in Literature and Films (HS3033) Assignment Sashank K EE11B124 3 November 2014 1 1 An Introduction to Moral Philosophy and some of its Theories Most humans judge the moral consequences of what they and others do. They classify everything as good or bad. Thus, ethical philosophy is a branch of philosophy which is relevant at some level to even laymen, who are not philoso- phers. All of us make moral judgments based on some preconceived or preexist- ing moral principle.

Read More

More about Strangers On A Train Morality

Related Topics

Open Document