ipl-logo

Strict Vs Anti Federalist Analysis

703 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Impact of declaration of independence

The year was 1789 and George Washington took the oath and became the first President of the United States. Although the country now had a president there was still much work that needed to be done. This was the beginning framework of the three branches of government we now have today. The signing of the Constitution created the judicial, legislative and executive branch. Still today, this is how the government is ran. Once the framework was complete there was still much uneasiness and disagreement with how the country should be ran. The Federalists were for big government and the anti-federalists wanted to keep it at the state level. I will compare the two groups and what they stand for.
Even though the majority of people were in favor …show more content…

Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who thought that the national government should be restricted to the powers given to them in the Constitution. However Alexander Hamilton and the people who followed him thought that there was a better way of reading the Constitution which was classified as loose reading, especially of the elastic clause which grants congress power. “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution . . . powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States.” “There can be no time, no state of things, in which credit is not essential to a nation…” “A national debt, if it is not excessive, will be to us a national blessing. It will be a powerful cement of our union.” The way Alexander Hamilton looked at and how he read the Constitution led him to believe that the clause gave congress the power to do anything that is not restricted in the Constitution. The loose reading of the Constitution is what was feared the most. This included the national bank which he thought could be formed because it does not say that it can not be done. After much debate between the looser reading and the tighter reading of the Constitution by the government, Congress approved the bank by a thin margin granting it a 20 year charter in February

Show More
Related
274 Words | 2 Pages

In 1787, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to establish a new, stronger government for the United States. During George Washington’s presidency in the 1790s, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson argued over the role of the government as dictated by the Constitution. As a result, a two party system consisting of the Hamiltonian Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans emerged. To some extent, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson reflected the policies and beliefs of the Federalist Hamilton.

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

Asia Pratka The first President of the United States, George Washington, and the first Congress set out to create a new banking system for the United States to help its taxing and spending powers become more fluid. Could the federal government create a National Banking system? Twenty-eight years later, McCulloch v. Maryland established the constitutionality of the necessary and proper clause through the Supreme Court. However, was the Supreme Court the right venue to decide if the necessary and proper clause instituted by Congress is constitutionally liberal or expressed, or should "We the People" have the decision?

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

In 1789, George Washington was elected as the first president of the new American republic. He selected several people to serve in his cabinet, among which were Alexander Hamilton, an ambitious young immigrant, and Thomas Jefferson, a wealthy plantation owner. Hamilton and Jefferson argued endlessly over various issues, and decisions about these issues contributed greatly to the shaping of our nation. Many of their beliefs have influenced our country to this day, especially their varying perspectives on the Constitution. Hamilton’s belief that the Constitution should be interpreted loosely had a greater effect on the early republic than the strict constructionist view that Jefferson held.

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

The argument between the Federalists and the Antifederalists principally centre on the Artivles of Confederation-Consitution. The Federalists and the Antifederalists have thier interpretions wheather the fedel government necessarliy exits or not. The Federalists believe that the relationship between fedel government and fifty states governments is stable and helpful. In contrast, the Antifederalists oppose this political struture and democratic goals, so that they think that the exitence of fedel government suppose to get corrupt. On the other hand, the Federalists and the Antifederalists also have different views about slaveries.

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

Both Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson had different opinions on how the First National Bank of The United States should be set up and if it goes by what is stated in the Constitution, which led to an argument between federalist and antifederalist in 1791. Federalist, Alexander Hamilton, was a strong believer in the development of a strong central government and broad a interpretation of the Constitution. On the other hand anti-federalist, Thomas Jefferson, was convinced that the government should have to undergo a strict interpretation of the Constitution and that the government shouldn't interfere, more than needed to, in the lives of the American people. Hamilton recommended that the government should in fact make the Bank of the

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

”(Chernow). while Jefferson “..favored states’ rights.”(Chernow). Hamilton and Jefferson have to put aside their personal beliefs in order to help the country thrive. Two different points of view can pull out what the other never saw. By using tactics from both parties, Jefferson and Hailton came up with a way to resolve America's debt.

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

Gordon 's premise in Hamilton 's Blessing is that the national debt can be used positively in order to boost the economy of a country like the United States. In the book, Gordon uses economic history and theory to examine the start, rise and decline of the United States debt. The author opens his book by stating that this country was born in debt, and this debt has become so high that concerned individuals no longer think about it. Hamilton 's Blessing charts the history of the national debt since when the central bank of the United States was founded in 1971, up to modern days. The intellectual architect of this creation was Alexander Hamilton, the first Treasury Secretary as well as a central figure who had a deep impact on the economic

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

Hamilton interpreted it loosely while Jefferson was strict. This led to an argument about whether the creation of a national bank was constitutional; Hamilton stated it was while Jefferson claimed it wasn’t. Another issue that they clashed

Read More
1449 Words | 6 Pages

Hamilton vs. Jefferson Visions to Reality     Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton both had very defined visions of the scope and power of the new federal government, how they saw the future of the economic development, and what the United States society should become. In my opinion Alexander Hamilton had more of an impact on the United States during the 1820’s and on contemporary government when compared to Thomas Jefferson. His policies did not strictly work during that time and many of his ideas are still seen in today’s society. Jefferson’s views and ideas on/of the national bank, higher tariffs, debt assumption, The Federalist Party, and his support of the ratification of the Constitution are all reasons in why his policies and visions came closer to becoming a reality.     Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, molded the gatherings that provoked to the twofold party system under which the U.S. works today.

Read More
1568 Words | 7 Pages

Hamilton wanted to create public credit with a treasury system, a national bank, a mint, and increase manufacturing which would help unify the country. On the other hand, there was Jefferson, who opposed a strong central government. He argued that the “wealthy would gain at the expense of ordinary Americans and that Hamilton’s political economy would corrupt the morality of citizens and undermine the social conditions essential to republican government”(Powerpoint). The country would opt for an approach closer to Hamilton’s views. One of the first acts was the National Banking Act.

Read More
214 Words | 1 Pages

“Federalists vs Anti-Federalists” The title of the article is “The Antifederalists were right” it was written on Sept. 27, 2006 by Gary Galles. The article was about the reasons why antifederalists were right. The Federalists wanted a strong central government.

Read More

More about Strict Vs Anti Federalist Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document