ipl-logo

Summary: College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

593 Words3 Pages

Over the years the decision whether or not to pay college athletes while they play sports and attend school has spread a lot of controversy. College athletes should not be payed. This is because the student decides to play sports, they’re not forced to. They also should not be paid because they are not professionally playing the sport.

College athletes are not forced to play the sport they do, everything the student does his based off of their own decision. According to Text 3, Lines 11-14 “Sorry Time Magazine : Colleges Have No Reason to Pay Athletes” the students take the offer for scholarships without a problem, but they could also leave anytime they want and become a regular tuition-paying student. A scholarship athlete is having their tuition paid for them and not only is the college doing that for the student, but the colleges are giving the student the athletic experience they need. College athletes gain exposure to the high profile environment and to many scouts for the professional sport they play. College athletes have a free education and gain exposure to the professional sport, so in a way it’s almost as if the colleges are paying the students in a different form. …show more content…

Some feel this way because according to Text 2, Lines 10-15, “It’s Time to Pay College Athletes” “college athletes are mass-audience performers and need to be rewarded as such.” Student athletes spend almost 40 hours per week on their sport and the sport they play is almost like a full-time job while going to school so they should be paid for it. However, even though some people would argue this statement, college athletes should not be paid. As referred to in Text 1, college athletes accept their scholarship with no questions asked and have the choice to leave anytime they want. Once students go to college they make decisions for themselves and they know what their responsibilities are when being a college

Show More
Related
979 Words | 4 Pages

College athletes deserve to be paid for their dedication to sports. There has been huge controversy over this and it is considered to be one of the most debatable topics in sports. Inequality in sports has been shown in many ways. This includes women inequity, racial inequality, and coaches being paid more depending on what sport they coach. College athletes should be compensated for their work and be given rights.

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Sports writer Joe Posnanski’s article “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid” argument over Dallas Morning News Editorial’s article, “paying them is fair, but it doesn't address college athletes' real need: an education” is more convincing to believe that college athletes should not be paid while receiving the benefits of a free education. DMN states that college athletes should be paid, because NCAA generate millions of income because of these players through private contracts. However, Posnanski’s claim that big time players already are paid through free college tuition, as well as covered room and board (Posnanski, 585). Even though DMN claims that college athletes go through difficult education process and may not be able to have chance to play professionally, he then correlated his source of information to the website of the NCAA, however, there is concern if this institution inflated the facts on the website (DMN). In contrast, Posnanski says argument of “College players are the reason why these schools generating so much money and they deserve a much bigger piece of the pie” is not really right.

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

Despite the controversy, there is tremendous amounts of evidence that conclude that college athletes should not get paid. This evidence can be seen in the scholarships they are already given, the potential expenses it could cause colleges and their students, and the level of amateurism and competition that needs to be maintained. First, college athletes are already compensated enough in the form of scholarships.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

“Student-athletes already receive significant compensation for participating in college athletics, including free tuition at highly competitive colleges and universities”(“College Athletes Should Remain Amateurs”). This is not true because only full ride scholarships cover all college expenses and these scholarships are only offered to the best. Most of the other scholarships don't fully cover expenses and some players may not even get a scholarship. “Students that show the top level of athletic prowess can earn full ride scholarships”(“Full Ride Scholarships: What They Are and How They Work”). This quote shows that it is very difficult to receive a full ride scholarship or any scholarship.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their

Read More
1379 Words | 6 Pages

Whether or not college athletes should be paid is not an easy question to answer as both sides of the argument have very valid claims. Most college students, especially those of whom are athletes, have extremely busy lives. It is also important to understand that athletes' main focus is sports, not academics. Athletes are not going to college to learn and earn a professional degree, but they are instead going there to pursue their goals in sports. College athletes should be paid after carefully considering financial and moral decisions such as the amount each athlete should get paid, how the athletes’ education will be affected, and what paying these people would mean for their futures.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

These athletes have more than passion for the sport they play not only because they are fighting for playtime but also managing to make decent grades to pass all of their classes. They don’t have time to go out and get a job; they barely have enough time to have a personal life. Many people are against these athletes being paid because they feel as if they don’t need the extra benefit, and most agree that receiving a scholarship for their education is plenty for these individuals. What people don’t see is that student athletes have been promised to receive an education to play, but many do not receive it. The universities make deals with networks to televise the games and with that,

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

They don’t think that 's enough they think they should get paid for the sport they play as well. Most college athletes would just be happy with a four year career playing a sport and not having to pay for their college education.(3) Some of the athletes think they should get paid for doing something that got them that education. Which I don’t think thats right. Also college athletes get opportunities at receiving both a college education and get the exposure to win a major professional contract.(1)

Read More

More about Summary: College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

Related Topics

Open Document