ipl-logo

Summary Of Federalist No. 78

482 Words2 Pages

In the essay Federalist No. 78 which was published June 14, 1788, Alexander Hamilton expressed his concerns towards the U.S Constitution. He begins the paper with “To the People of the State of New York” where he is addressing the proposed government with his proposition. Hamilton clarifies to the people that the Supreme Court should have the authority and regulation to declare acts to Congress. The Federalist No. 78 is written to develop a clear idea of the judiciary under the Constitution. Which simply refers to federal judges and appointing them, regulation and power, the court alone, and lastly jurisdiction. The issues Alexander Hamilton hits are major because he feels as though the judiciary branch is very weak and just lacks accountability that it shall be withholding. Hamilton describes the judiciary branch has the weakest amongst the 3 branches of government. He addresses issues that were presented directly to the …show more content…

Hamilton refers to the executive branch being the “…sword of the community” and the legislative “…commands the purse”. I agree with his argument where he feels as though the judiciary needed more independence compared to the other branches. Hamilton expresses that “…duty it must be to declare all acts contrary to manifest tenor of the Constitution void” where the branch should be strong enough to turn down laws passed by the Congress. Also, the act of “permanency in office”, which happens in today’s society. Alexander Hamilton says, “…all judges who may be appointed by the U.S are to hold their offices DURING GOOD BEHAVIOR” so the tenure of federal judges would be somewhat protected referring to judges withholding their place instead of being temporary. Hamilton also states “permanency in office” and I feel that Hamilton’s call to action pertaining to the U.S Constitution protecting not only the other branches but the judiciary just as much. (168

Show More
Related

Federalist No. 78 Summary

63 Words | 1 Pages

There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist Paper No. 51

774 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist Papers No. 51 were written by either James Madison or Alexander Hamilton to address the various concerns the residents of New York had with the newly formed government provided to them and the other colonies via the Constitution, more specifically the purpose of the new structure of government, the separation into different branches of the government and each branch’s reliance on the people, and the system of checks and balances and duties placed on each branch among other things. The Federalist Papers No. 51 also explained the necessity of the government outlined in the Constitution and why the founding fathers found it best to arrange the new government the way they did. One of the main ideas addressed in the Federalist

Read More

1790s Dbq Analysis

274 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1790s, before their presidencies, the views of Jefferson and Madison differed from those of Hamilton. Hamilton, a Federalist, supported a strong central government that could enforce the law and uphold the Constitution. (Doc B) Before

Read More

Analysis Of Federalist Paper Number 70 By Alexander Hamilton

1552 Words | 7 Pages

In Federalist Paper Number 70, Alexander Hamilton wrote an article titled The Executive Department Further Considered. In this paper Hamilton using the pseudonym Publius, makes the case for a single-person executive chief for the future federal government. Hamilton writes that the President must have qualities as an “Executive which are the most necessary ingredients…vigor and expedition. ”

Read More

Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Research Paper

1002 Words | 5 Pages

Hamilton responded to this concern in the essays by saying the unity of the states were at risk of falling apart without a national government to hold everything together, and that by implementing a judicial branch and the Presidential veto, there was a series of checks and balances that would prevent the Congress from becoming too powerful. In addition, the members of the House of Representatives were elected by the people, which would prevent them from acting against the people’s best interests. By taking each section of the document separately the three writers were able to discuss benefits of the Constitution, like improving the economy, supporting a Navy and defense, and just generally what specific powers, and limits on powers, were given to the various branches of the newly proposed government. Hamilton also pointed out that if this new form of government turned out to have hiccups, it was not set in stone, and amendments could be proposed to modify and improve the

Read More

Discussion Of The Presidency In Federalist Paper 69 By Alexander Hamilton

151 Words | 1 Pages

Federalist Paper 69, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788, addresses the topic of the presidency. Its purpose was to illustrate to the people of New York what the real character of the executive would be. The subject matter and time period of this essay allow for speculation that the people of that time were concerned that ratifying a constitution with a president at the head of government would have been willingly putting themselves beneath a tyrannical ruler, after having recently gained independence from tyrannical King George III. Throughout this essay, Hamilton adamantly stressed the fact that the president would not be likened unto the king of Great Britain, but rather unto the governor of New York. The president would be an elected

Read More

Differences Between Jefferson And Hamilton's Beliefs

754 Words | 4 Pages

The first ideal made by Hamilton that affected the Democratic Republic government in the late 1800s was their power policies in the central government. Although the Democratic Republic’s beliefs included more power to the people rather than the government, during Jefferson’s presidency, the policy was affected by Hamilton’s policy, including the necessary and proper clause. For example, during the Louisiana Purchase, Jefferson used Hamilton's elastic clause to expand the land and resources for trade. This was technically unconstitutional, as he didn’t go through congress first, but he used the clause created by Hamilton and his ideals for the betterment of his country. This is ironic though, because he later opposed Hamilton’s national bank in 1791, because of the unconstitutionality (Doc 1).

Read More

The Anti-Federalist No. 84

392 Words | 2 Pages

I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.

Read More

Stonewall Riots Essay

648 Words | 3 Pages

There are three federal branches in the U.S.; the legislative, executive, and judiciary. The judiciary branch has the “power” to evaluate law. It is able to take down a law or an executive branch to be declared as unconstitutional. However, declaring a law unconstitutional is not that easy for the courts. In Federalist NO. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, the judiciary branch is said to be the weakest due to all of the ways the legislative and executive branch can enforce their power upon them.

Read More

Hamilton's Economic System Between 1789 And 1820 Essay

725 Words | 3 Pages

Hamilton justified the Bank of the United States with the necessary and proper "elastic" clause in the Constitution.

Read More

Jefferson Vs Hamilton Research Paper

283 Words | 2 Pages

Hamilton interpreted it loosely while Jefferson was strict. This led to an argument about whether the creation of a national bank was constitutional; Hamilton stated it was while Jefferson claimed it wasn’t. Another issue that they clashed

Read More

The Federalist No. 10 Argument

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Federalist 70

1015 Words | 5 Pages

However, Hamilton does not agree. This is a strong statement to prove that an energetic president is the key point for a good government. Presidency, is responsible for national defense, “the steady administration of laws” and the protection of property rights. Moreover, the power of the executive

Read More

What Are The Two Most Important Problems Facing Founding Fathers

317 Words | 2 Pages

When developing the US constitution the two most important problems facing the founding fathers was how much power and authority should be given to Congress and having a strong central government along with the Bill of Rights. Alexander Hamilton along with James Madison believed that a strong central government would be necessary for the nation to survive and succeed. Jefferson disagreed and felt that the nation's powers should belong to the states and local governments. Jefferson “opposed a strong centralized Government and championed the rights of states. (1) Finally, a compromise was agreed upon “that in a republican government, power should be divided among three separate branches--legislative, executive, and judicial, a principle enshrined

Read More

How Does Hamilton Say That The Judicial Is The Weakest Branch Of Government

243 Words | 1 Pages

I disagree with Alexander Hamilton 's statement that the "Judiciary is the weakest branch of government” today. It might be the case because the judiciary branch is hardly in the media. Both the president and congress always making noise. They are always on the news, the president is trying to do something and complaining that congress is holding him back, for example “Obama Care”, and congress is all talk and no action especially, for issues that matter to the normal people for example, healthcare and taxes issues. On the other hand, judiciary branch is quite and hardly in the news and that’s what Hamilton probably meant by the “weakest branch” (The Judiciary, 2017).

Read More

More about Summary Of Federalist No. 78

Related Topics

Open Document