ipl-logo

Argumentative Essay: Federalist 70

1015 Words5 Pages

Vy Tran Professor Matthew Freeman November 16th, 2015 Argumentative essay: Federalist 70 In my perspective, the most significant argument made in Federalist 70 is the power and energy of the presidency is a standout amongst the most referenced federalist papers concerning the administration and an executive branch should be ruled by a single man. Some people argued that a vigorous and strong executive is not suitable with a republican principles. However, Hamilton does not agree. This is a strong statement to prove that an energetic president is the key point for a good government. Presidency, is responsible for national defense, “the steady administration of laws” and the protection of property rights. Moreover, the power of the executive …show more content…

Two people, who have equal authority and power, must differ, different in the way they think, different in the way they handle a problem, different in their egos. Thus, the double Presidency can increase the opportunity of opposing factions simply because each of them, has distinct personal ambition and it is extremely, dangerous, they can drag more people to follow their ideology and create divisiveness. It is unnecessary and unwise to create the Executive Branch, which would make this form of divisiveness, moreover, differences of opinion lead to debate and conflict whenever the nation has a problem to …show more content…

First of all, too many people in a council creates a big complex, no individual is willing to take responsibility for faults or mistakes, which are way more easily hidden. The American president, not at all like the British King, who not be resisted from reprimand, responsibility, or discipline. The English King is not considered in charge of his organization, and his individual is sacrosanct. The council and the King are connected and it completely protect the King’s power. This is an exactly comparison between the American president and the British King. The American president, takes all the responsibility for what he does and he is watched by the other branches so there is no way that he can conceal or make mistake. Secondly, Hamilton asserts that there is the matter of cost. Some people recommend that an executive branch should be large. Thus, it will asks for more money to maintain that large council and that money is too high for a nation to be affordable. Lastly, before the Constitution was composed, keen men concurred that single presidency was a standout amongst the most outstanding elements of state

Show More
Related
438 Words | 2 Pages

In The Rise of the Plebiscitary Presidency, Professor Craig Rimmerman argues against the “plebiscitary presidency”, where the president governs through the direct support of the American people. Rimmerman argues that the Framers of the Constitution assumed that the legislative branch would serve as the central policymaking role. The modern plebiscitary presidency has been shaped by the tremendous amount of personal power drawn from the people through the Supreme Court and Congress. Rimmerman argues that the consequence of a presidentially-centered form of government that Neustadt and other scholars failed to recognize is that presidents will strive to meet the expectations that come with the new presidency to the extreme, where they will exert

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

The second act shows us Hamilton’s goals of taking control within the governmental system. Hamilton has several debates with multiple leads in government. Hamilton and Jefferson have multiple altercations within the government during the first planning stages of the government. Hamilton’s plan of The Compromise of 1790, is one result of a debate Hamilton had. John Adams, Aaron Burr and a few others had multiple encounters with

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

With this immense amount of power comes extreme limitations which can sometimes severely hamper the effectives of a presidential term. Unlike the misconstrued widely held belief of most Americans the President is not able to single handily reshape the economy, engage in military conflicts, or dictate the pace of legislature. In terms of passing new legislature or economic reform the president

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

After the Constitution of the United States of America was ratified, George Washington put its words into action. With the formation of his Cabinet, he appointed two men that soon created conflicts with their contrasting beliefs about how the new government should be run. These men, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, soon gained support and divided the country into political parties. Those who supported a stronger federal government, like Hamilton, called themselves Federalists; in opposition, Jefferson leading the Democratic republicans, favored a stronger state government. Both parties had America’s best interest at heart, however Hamilton and the Federalists’ ideas concerning the economy, interpretation of the Constitution, and the future of American society made them more fit for governing the United States.

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

In Federalist Paper Number 70, Alexander Hamilton wrote an article titled The Executive Department Further Considered. In this paper Hamilton using the pseudonym Publius, makes the case for a single-person executive chief for the future federal government. Hamilton writes that the President must have qualities as an “Executive which are the most necessary ingredients…vigor and expedition. ”

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

Federalist Paper 69, written by Alexander Hamilton in 1788, addresses the topic of the presidency. Its purpose was to illustrate to the people of New York what the real character of the executive would be. The subject matter and time period of this essay allow for speculation that the people of that time were concerned that ratifying a constitution with a president at the head of government would have been willingly putting themselves beneath a tyrannical ruler, after having recently gained independence from tyrannical King George III. Throughout this essay, Hamilton adamantly stressed the fact that the president would not be likened unto the king of Great Britain, but rather unto the governor of New York. The president would be an elected

Read More
640 Words | 3 Pages

Of the many roles the president plays for the American government, acting as the commander in chief is very important for the common good. The commander-in-chief 's main tasks are to leave the United States military, make decisions in times of war and to control the Armed Forces. However, to prevent excessive military control, checks and balances only allow Congress to declare war, not the

Read More
1319 Words | 6 Pages

If anyone was to do even a little research about the United States in 1787, one would find that the states were not very unified and life was not easy. Men like, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and George Washington had one thing in mind, to reunite the United States. The book, A Brilliant Solution by Carol Berkin, very clearly depicts the obstacles and adversity that the men attending the constitutional convention had to overcome. Due to a plethora of factors, the men attending the constitutional convention encountered many complications during the convention, ranging from travel issues to a lack of power to even do anything necessary to change the “United” States. The book shows this by describing the story of the men as a “story of anxious

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

In the late 18th century, the newly formed United States of America was facing numerous challenges as it sought to establish a stable government that would ensure the protection of its citizens and the preservation of their liberties. The country was divided over the issue of the proper role of government, with some advocating for a strong central government and others favoring a more decentralized system. Alexander Hamilton, one of the nation's founding fathers, recognized the importance of a strong central government and wrote about it in Federalist Paper No. 6. Hamilton argued that the United States was too large and diverse a country to be governed by a weak central government. The country was spread out over a vast area and its citizens had different cultures, interests, and ways of life.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

Are you a Federalist or an Anti-Federalist? The proportional representation of the people and the government in the pursuit of equality and happiness is thoroughly explained through the Anti-Federalist party. Jackson Turner Main wrote, "to them, the man of 'federal principles' approved of 'federal measures,' which meant those that increased the weight and authority or extended the influence of the Confederation Congress." By stating this he intended to provide the explanation and root of the problem; the egos of both parties, especially federalists were a constant wall blocking the parties from a resolution The Anti-Federalists were composed of many differential elements.

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

The popular conception of the president as the main figure of national government, conceiving a legislative program and ordering a huge staff of mentors, is very much an outcome of the modern era and of the extended part of the government. Only since the 1930s, has the presidency been strong regardless of who has occupied the office and whether or not there has ever been an extreme issue. However, the popular conception of the president as the main figure of national government contradicts the realities of current legislative-executive relations. Throughout national policymaking from the Eisenhower years through the Reagan management, Congress, not the president, frequently took the lead in establishing the legislative agenda.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

The 1st Amendment You are talking about the government... BOOM!! You're in jail.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Essentially it was supposed to be this way, but presidency’s power is much greater. I do not think the president should be considered the most powerful person in world or in the nation for that matter. I guess the Framers did not foresee presidency to be as powerful as it is; yet I do not believe they would change it. Presidents play two major roles. Their role is chief of state is basically to be the face of the nation.

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution defines the president as the executive who puts into effect the laws Congress passes. The president is elected every four years, and can only be re-elected once. The president is both the head of state and head of government of the USA, and the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces. The president is also responsible for the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. The president of the USA is by many considered the most powerful man in the world.

Read More

More about Argumentative Essay: Federalist 70

Related Topics

Open Document