ipl-logo

Summary Of Four Voices The Great Manitoulin Island Treaty Of Sana

708 Words3 Pages

Before the Manitoulin Treaty of 1862 the Anishinaabe people had occupied the land for centuries living in relative isolation with their own customs and traditions utilizing the entirety of the island, which resulted in great economic prosperity. However, after the treated was signed in 1862 and the provisions of the document were implemented the people were forcefully assimilated into nineteenth century English society. These ensuing enactments not only deprived them of their own heritage and culture, but also sent them into economic turmoil, which was caused by sedentary agriculture, resettlement, and failed government initiatives. Pearen, Shelley J. Four Voices: The Great Manitoulin Island Treaty of 1862. Ottawa: S.J. Pearen], 2012. Print. In the novel, Four Voices: The Great Manitoulin Island Treaty of 1862, by S.J. Pearson the entire process and impact of the Manioutlin Treaty is highlighted quite vividly. The novel illustrates the circumstances beforehand that led to the signing and shows it from the perspective of the Anishinaabe that inhabited the island for centuries, and of the English that were looking to settle the island to wreak economic profit. The text paints the picture of how the Anishinaabe people were living before the treaty …show more content…

The failed government initiatives are broken down and there is an explanation provided about the reasoning behind their implementation. Also highlighted in the article is why these initiatives such as sedentary agriculture failed and how they opposed the Anishinaabe culture and way of life. Other provisions such as relocation are also underlined in the text, which coupled with sedentary agriculture provide a very good understanding as to why these initiatives were unsuccessful with a people who moved throughout the land as needed during the

Show More
Related
238 Words | 1 Pages

I think “The United States annexes Hawaii in 1900” should be paired with imperialism. The meaning of imperialism is the policy that creates colonies in the weaker nations in order to make raw materials and have access to the new markets. The reason why I think The United States annexing Hawaii in 1900 is a part of imperialism is because once Americans was done settling in Hawaii they started to grow sugar and sold it to the Americans in the US; both the US and Hawaii in 1875 and Hawaii agreed to trading sugar and this allowed Hawaiian sugar to be shipped to the US without tariffs. The agreement between the US and Hawaii ended when Congress passed the “McKinley Tariff of 1890”.

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

The white man’s dream is of new energy sources and industrial development however, the maps that the Indigenous peoples create of their territory gets in the way of this (Brody, 1981, p. 30). Indigenous groups have lost a lot of land that was once the center of their hunting and trapping systems due to the ignorance of settlers and developers of First Nations economic and cultural

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

“Kanehsatake : 270 Years of Resistance” deals with the Oka crisis, a confrontation between Mohawk Indians living on area near Oka and the Canadian military. The interest of a local land development leads to government approval to expand a private 9-hole golf course and to build a luxury housing, both to be located on a burial ground and sacred pine grove belonging to the Mohawk nation. These serve as a momentum of a 270 year battle to officially regain their territory. A crowd of Mohawk Indians bloked incoming contruction equipment, and then the invaders called SQ(Quebec’s provincial police) in.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

Historical treaties signed between the Indigenous people of Canada and the British Crown helped further the development of Canada in terms in alliances, trade, and land settlement. These early historical treaties such as The Covenant Chain created alliances between the Indigenous people and British colonies, which were important in keeping good relations for negotiating more treaties in the future. Moreover, The Peace and Friendship Treaties were simply to create peace and good relations between the Mi'kmaq and Maliseet in the maritime regions. Treaties were not only for peace and friendship, but land cessions as well. The Robinson Treaties were negotiated between William Robinson and the Ojibwa Chiefs, the purpose of the treaties allowed mining

Read More
1374 Words | 6 Pages

Native groups often took land and materials from weaker groups whenever it suited them. They understood the concept of ownership by conquest. From the time the first settlers landed on Turtle Island [America], the Natives were pushed from their home. In 1783, George Washington wrote a letter to James Duane, outlining principles of the Indian Policy of the Continental Congress. Washington outlined ‘an enlightened People’ would consider the Native to be deluded and that “as the country is large enough to contain us all; and as we are disposed to be kind to them and to partake in their trade…we will draw a veil over what is past and establish a boundary line between them and us beyond which we will endeavor to restrain our People from Hunting or Settling” (4).

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

From a foreign perspective, one of the main reasons the Mahele was enacted was because of the western way of thinking towards land ownership. The western way of thinking towards land ownership was that each individual could purchase, own, and sell land (Cachola). As the foreigners were accustomed to that way of thinking, they were perplexed by by the fact that the Hawaiians didn’t have the same ideas in terms of land ownership. So, the foreigners demanded that they system be changed in a way they they could buy and own land in fee simple (Cachola). Also, they Mahele of 1848 was created because many foreigners craved the right to own land, mainly to start businesses and to have ownership of the land beneath their homes.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

In the 1992, book A Spirited Resistance: The North American Indian Struggle for Unity, 1745-1815 Gregory Evans Dowd takes an academic approach to Eastern Native American history. Dowd follows the same study identity and cultural transformations by focusing on two Eastern Native ideologies known as nativist and accommodationists. Elaborating on the outlooks, he argues that the monograph does not tell “history from the Indian point of view” and does not focus on a “single Indian outlook.” Advancing his argument the author states that his monograph provides historians with the many perspectives surrounding the Native American history in the seventeen and eighteen hundreds.

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

Francis Paul Pucha in American Indian Treaties related how Indian treaties are in constant litigation, despite many of them are upheld by court decisions today. Despite recent Indian legal successes, shamefully the federal government wrote most, if not all, treaties without the best concerns for the Indians. While "treaty" implies a contract between sovereign nations, Indians were not always in a position of equal negotiators. The government demonstrated little intent to fulfill promises when force failed. During this same period three significant Supreme Court decisions (the Marshall Trilogy, 1823-1832) passed.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

The “loose association” among the Seminole bands and disagreements among members within the bands gave rise to many unknowns about the intentions behind those who signed the treaty, and those Seminoles in Florida who refused to accept the authority of the chiefs who travelled to the Indian Territory. Furthermore, the African Americans among the Seminoles, including Abraham, were convinced that moving to the Indian Territory, where the Creeks occupied the land, risked re-enslavement. Like many white planters, the Creeks persisted with federal claims on escaped slaves who sought refuge among the Seminoles. The African Americans, Abraham among them, fearing this, worked hard at convincing the Seminole Indians to oppose removal.

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

This relates to relations with the Powhatans because the Powhatans knew how to survive there, the could have helped the settlers but they chose not

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

As the Shawnees were attempting to reunite in the Ohio Valley, they found themselves displaced and had to defend their territory from western expansion. The Shawnees placed all their trust in the British, which didn’t turn out positive for them, for when the British ceded all lands west of the Appalachian Mountains, which endangered the lives of the Natives. “For the

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

I have chosen to use "The Creek Documents" as my primary source for "The McGillivray Moment". Historical American-Indian communities stayed for the most part as oral cultures. Many scholars of American and Indian history have restructured the Indian past by utulizing documents written from indian oral traditions and outsiders. Having to render documents written by outsiders is a process that is laden with problems. The outside spectators almost always could not comprehend what they were seeing.

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

With the arrival of Anglo-Americans, Native Americans lost much more than just their land. Tribes were forced onto reservations, stripped of their culture, wealth and place in society, with no hope of regaining what they owned unless by complete assimilation. For the latter half of the 19th and early 20th centuries, many Anglo-Americans continually pushed for Native Americans to abandon their cultures and “savage” ways. However, despite the many attempts to force Natives into Anglo-American culture, many Native Americans found ways to negotiate with the demands of the Anglo-Americans through mainly social, economic and legal means.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

The United State’s annexation of Hawaii in 1898 led to the gradual destruction of the Hawaiian culture and the almost-extinction of native-born Hawaiians. The majority of the Hawaiian natives opposed the annexation of Hawaii and wanted to maintain their sovereignty. Although the Japanese could have taken over the Hawaiian islands if the United States had not, the annexation of Hawaii by the U.S. was unjustified because of the treatment of the monarchy and natives, the infringement of the natives’ self-established culture and government, and the natives’ overwhelming opposition to the U.S’s involvement in Hawaii. From 1795 to 1874, the Kamehameha Dynasty ruled over the kingdom of the Hawaiian islands. Up until the death of Kamehameha III, the U.S. had stayed out of interfering with the islands.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

In his oration to Governor Isaac I. Stevens Chief Seattle, a Native American leader addresses the governor's request to buy Indian lands and create reservations. Through his oration Seattle boldly presents his stance on the issue of Indian lands, representing his people as a whole. On account for his native people Chief Seattle's stands up for their land through the use of imagery, parallels, and rhetorical questions. Chief Seattle communicates his purpose by using bold imagery that directs the audience to the cause that Seattle is speaking of. He uses metaphors and similes comparing aspects of nature to the issue at hand.

Read More

More about Summary Of Four Voices The Great Manitoulin Island Treaty Of Sana

Related Topics

Open Document