ipl-logo

Summary Of Graded Absolutism

1181 Words5 Pages

In ethics, there are several ethical systems one may follow. The three approaches to be reviewed will be unqualified absolutism, situational absolutism and graded absolutism. These approaches will be defined and examples will be given of each of these. Concluding with an over view of which approach I feel that aligns with the way I make decisions in ethical matters. Unqualified absolutism can be described by Augustine as an absolutism with no moral conflict. There are no moral conflicts because there are no exceptions because it is absolute. Sin is avoidable because moral solutions are absolute, so there is no conflict between right or wrong. Going against this moral absolute is wrong regardless of the situation. He states that even doing a …show more content…

His thought was around love and that there was an order of who or what we are to love. He did believe that moral conflicts can occur and when they do we are to follow the higher moral law. Others have given their input into this such as Charles Hodge holds that truth is absolute but it can be alright to be falsified. Hodges insight gave the elements of graded absolutism known today. Within graded absolutism it says that all moral laws are not the same. Within the Bible scripture states moral laws that are higher than others. Matthew 22:34-40 from the Bible tells of Jesus stating that the first is loving God and then loving our neighbor (Geisler, 2010, p. 97-101). When confronted with situations in this thinking we are to follow the higher of the law and when we do our sins will be forgiven. Per Geisler (2010), “God does not hold the individual responsible for personally unavoidable moral conflicts, providing that one keeps the higher law” …show more content…

In a case study provided by the article Any absolutes? Absolutely! (2009), it tells of a woman and how she lied to save some Jewish people from a Nazi camp. In looking at this study is lying justified? If we look at what unqualified absolutism says it says that moral laws should never be broken therefore, we must not lie even if it means someone will die. Since this is an absolute moral law and truth is absolute there would be no exceptions to lie. In looking at this by conflicting absolutism it would say lying is forgivable because there are conflicting laws. This approach says we live in a world with conflicting laws and that this conflict is unavoidable. So, if lying would save lives of the Jewish people then we are breaking a lesser law. We would then ask for forgiveness for breaking Gods absolute law about no lying. Even though God has absolute laws he will not change because of conflicting problems. In graded absolutism, it would day lying is right sometimes if we are following the higher law. Because this approach says there are higher and lower moral laws lying to save lives would be justified. This approach holds that God would not judge us because of something we can’t avoid we would be exempted for following the higher law

Show More
Related
1523 Words | 7 Pages

That way, his pleading for forgiveness would be justified and maybe would be right to ask for if his victims were there. There arguments are very persuasive, but next we will look at the Catholic perspective on the

Read More
1544 Words | 7 Pages

“His plea for forgiveness was addressed to someone who lacked the power to grant it” as Harold S. Kushner responds in (Wiesenthal, 1998, p. 184). Karl can only receive forgiveness from the ones he committed the crime against, but because of his actions they all perished. Abraham Joshua Heschel a Jewish rabbi, one of the responders said, “No one can forgive crimes against other people. According to Jewish traditions, even God himself can only forgive sins committed against Himself, not against man” (Wiesenthal, 1998, p.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Developing from the reasoning of (Russ Shafer-Landau, p.p 13), it is clear that there is a difference between normative ethics and metaethics. Normative ethics are those values that develop from within a personality and are always employed whenever ethics are breached. On the other hand the metaethics is basically the diverse elements that are considered crucial for building positive ethical believes. (Shafer-Landau, p.p 29), also brings forward other moral ethical elements such as the moral error theory, the desire-satisfaction theory, ethical particularism and the doctrine of double effects. All the above elements are crucial for shaping ones ethical perspectives and inclinations leave alone resolving ethical issues within a society.

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Since we have identified the type of ethical problem, we will look to the ethical frameworks that could be used to assess the

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

This is so because it becomes difficult to know whether moral goodness is independent of the will of God or if it is as a result of His will. The Euthyphro dilemma offers two intensely differing sides. On one side of the argument, theorists are of the opinion that morality is whatever God wills. This position then brings into question the goodness of God’s will if His command vindicates what is wrong. Arguing that goodness is the determined by God shows that what is rights is so because God wills it to be right.

Read More
1008 Words | 5 Pages

Some worldviews have very stiff rules that do not allow deviations. As consequence of this strict regulations, many ethical problems arise. The Practical Ethical worldview looks at the reason why a person would reach the point of considering that certain activity and

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

In this essay I will argue against the previously mentioned statement using the following arguments: The inconsistency between theists, the dependence of morality on religion and finally, Euthyphro’s dilemma. One problem with the Divine Command Theory is that it assumes that all its followers agree on what

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

The concept of ethics entails systemizing, justifying, and recommending right and wrong conduct. It involves in practical reasoning: good, right, duty, obligation, virtue, freedom, rationality, and choice. Humanity has questioned this concept of ethics and ‘good’ for as long as it has survived, as it deals with real-life issues such as “what is morally right and wrong?” and “how do people ought to act?”

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

Absolutism was a period of prosperity during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Absolutism is a form of government, a monarchy, in which a monarch has full governmental control. This is different from that of a limited monarch whose power is kept in check by a constitution or other government officials. Absolute monarchs gain their power in one of two ways: being born into a royal family and being in line for the throne or seizing control. Absolutism meant prosperity because monarchs were considered gods (or God 's power on earth), they changed countries for the better, and could be liked by the people for not doing everything in a harsh way.

Read More
1524 Words | 7 Pages

In today’s world, many people tend to have a set of ethical principles which is one of the guidelines for them to follow on. The question is how he or she defines ethics? To answer, Ethics is best defined as knowing what is right or wrong in the action based on the moral principles. Moreover, it is also known as the branch of knowledge that deals with ethical issues. In relation, there are some ethical theories which deal with the ethical issues.

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

In this essay, I compared Utilitarianism and Deontology, and argued that Deontology is a better ethics system than Utilitarianism because, while Utilitarianism focuses solely on results, Deontology considers humans as more than just a means to an end and provides for a system of generally accepted

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Moreover, there is no universal truth in ethics, only various cultural codes instead. On the other point of view, it has been suggested that the world should derive an objective truth in every action. This essay will argue against the existence of objective truth in

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Decisions about right and wrong fill each and every day. Turmoil exists due to deciding if Deontology, where one acts based on the right motives, or if Utilitarianism, where one should act in a way that would produce the best results and consequences, should govern decisions and their morality. However, I believe Deontology, which is reason and duty based, serves as the superior way to dictate morality. In this paper, I will explain both the principles of Deontology and Utilitarianism, discuss the superior aspects of Deontology as compared to Utilitarianism, as well as grapple with objections to Deontology. While both ethical frameworks contain parts of ideologies that could be seen as valid, Kant’s theory on Deontology holistically remains

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

One of the most regarded ethical theories in contemporary period is deontological ethics. From historical point of view, contemporary or recent refers to the early or middle part of the twentieth century, and even the late nineteenth century. There are some features of these contemporary ethical theories that appear to express relatively modern points of view. One of which is the emphasis on plurality or multiplicity and relativity; another feature is the denial of absolutes and universality. Theories in this era focus on the importance of lower-level rules, judgements or decisions that are said to test, enhance or even replace principles.

Read More

More about Summary Of Graded Absolutism

Related Topics

Open Document