More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain what is meant by deontological ethics [10] essay
The effects of the atomic bomb
The use of the atomic bomb in World War II
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The entire faculty Senate of a Christian college in Massachusetts has stepped down after a pro-LGBT professor was denied a promotion over her criticism of the school’s policies on homosexual behavior. Gordon College implements a Life and Conduct Statement which prohibits any sexual activity --- including those between individuals of the same sex --- outside of marriage. The school also adheres to the biblical teaching on marriage, Christian News details. Margaret DeWeese-Boyd, who works as an assistant professor of sociology at the Christian college, recently complained to the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination that she was denied a promotion because she has been speaking against the school’s policy in the last four years. She has also hosted training sessions and events focusing on homosexual rights.
Week Three Journal 1. Describe your personality (choose 3 power words) A. Driven B. Strong C. Tactful Driven: I am generally pretty ambitious person, and when I set my mind to something I won’t stop until I feel like I reached my objective.
There are three assumptions to have an ethical system: desires for eternal authority and making decisions, and need for God. In order to have a credible ethical system, it is important to have a desire for eternal authority, and a desire to decide for ourselves. If we have a desire for eternal authority we understand that there are things above us, and that the things above us should govern for us or help us govern. If we have a desire to decide for ourselves we can have our own opinions, and help make decisions for a credible ethical system. The desires for eternal authority and to decide for ourselves are examples of primitives.
Ethical theories are ways of telling right from wrong and include guidelines of how to live and act in an ethical way. For example when faced with a difficult situation in your life, you can use ethical theories to assist you in making the right decision. One key theory is consequentialism, which says that an individual’s correct moral response is related to the outcome/ consequence of the act and not its intentions/ motives. Early writers on this theory were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, a modern writer is Peter Singer. For example Brenda Grey has asked for the asthma specialist to visit her weekly, and to decide if this is necessary the professionals involved have to look at how it would affect her wellbeing.
Chris McCandless, whose story is analyzed in Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, is a young adult who decides to leave his known habits and material belongings behind and live a completely self-sufficient life in the wilderness, a choice which ultimately leads to his death. In doing that, he also forfeits his family and friends. With that in mind, a question can be posed regarding the ethics of said behavior. As a childless, single and financially independent man, Chris McCandless has absolute ownership of his body and thus his decision to continue doing a sport that he knows can kill him is ethically defensible.
The overriding issue presented in this scenario is one of bullying experienced by the less fortunate scholarship student on the grounds of his “scruffy” appearance. The NSW Department of Education and Communities (2016, 1.1) has a zero tolerance to any form of bullying within the learning environment, whether it be physical or psychological. This is exhibited within this scenario as the other students are misusing their more fortunate socio-economic position to bastardize this student who falls outside their circle of acceptance. However, despite their meaningful intentions, educators must take the appropriate steps to ensure that ethical conundrums do not present themselves, whilst bearing in mind both the students wellbeing and maintaining
In simple words, a moral theory is an effort at outlining what an individual ought to do in accord to an intrinsic good. It can take many aspects, each with it’s own strength and weaknesses, and each appealing in it’s own way. In this paper I will focus on two normative ethical theories, consequentialism and deontology. I will respectively describe each one, and will then proceed to list their corresponding benefits and shortcomings. I will conclude by siding with consequentialism for various reasons that I will try my best to explain.
Utilitarianism and Situation ethics Does a vigilante contribute more good than harm to a society? In this Philosophy internal assessment I will be discussing, analyzing and comparing the two theories of utilitarianism and situation ethics and which one has a better representation of what a vigilante does to a city or a society because of its actions and its consequences of these actions. The stimulus that I will be using to accurately express these two theories in regards with a vigilante is the television show Arrow. This fictional television show shows how a stranded playboy billionaire returns to his home city seeking revenge for the wrongs his family had done to the city and to clean up this horrible city up as he turns from a weak boy
The normative theories are the branch of philosophy that studies ethical behavior. The major normative theories are egoism, utilitarianism, Kantianism and virtue ethics. Egoism and Utilitarianism are strongly related they lie under consequentialist theories. From its name, consequentialist theories demonstrate that the action depends on its consequence. The difference between the two is that egoism focuses on self-interest, while utilitarianism addresses maximum happiness to everyone (Sansbury, Barry and Shaw, 2013).
Ethical issues I ensure that I will submit a general CFREB application for ethical issues in conducting my study and involving participants (i.e. parents and/or students in this case). I will make sure that both students and parents have a clear idea about what my research entails and that consent is voluntary for all involved. Names will not be used and privacy will be held to the highest standard. I will not let my biases of the outcomes affect the collection of arbitrary data for research use.
My belief is that there are no definite good and bad people in this world, but instead we are all in this grey area of being both being good and bad. The unit on human nature at the beginning of the trimester changed how I viewed the world completely. Specifically, when we as a class discussed moral dilemmas, I strongly believed at the time that there were good and bad people in this world and your actions showed what kind of person you were but the more we dug into moral decisions it become clear to me that no one could be the perfect moral human being. Our moral decisions show us what we value in life or what we hold to us dearly and we often judge people for their moral decisions but we have all made decisions that have been against our
Dian Davis Professor: Shomaker PHL 115 November 7, 2014 In the past few months I have been introduced to several different theories, but three of those theories stood out in my mind, Deontological theory which rejects consequences as the basis of right and wrong and focus instead on our duty to practice or avoid particular kind of action. On the other hand, Rule Utilitarianism a consequentialist moral theory that defines a morally right rule or practice as one that promote overall utility and Virtue ethics believe that one has to have specific character traits like loyalty, compassion, generosity that have moral value in one self without any underline principles or action guiding them. Some of the similarities of deontological theory and rule
Although the Bible emphasises the sacredness of human life, as being made in the image of God, Joseph Fletcher argues from a Liberal Christian perspective. He argues in his ethical theory that the greatest Agape or love of one’s neighbour is shown to result in certain situations. In the context of euthanasia he would argue that the greatest Christian compassion should be shown to the sufferers in the final stages of terminal illness as well as the greatest Agape for the family, who are also suffering. In this sense, situation ethics seems to support active, voluntary and involuntary euthanasia, as it shows the greatest Christian compassion in the circumstances.
Throughout the field of philosophy, ethics play an extensive role. This branch of knowledge is significantly important within the area of moral philosophy, as the main concept touches on moral principles and behaviour of mankind as a consequence of such principles. LaFollette (2000) expressed his view that as a whole, humanity ‘should better understand ourselves, our place in the world, and our relationship to others’, from which I believe, can be derived through ethics. When studying the behaviour of humans and their proficiency to make decisions, I have learned that there are two leading philosophical positions which determine the way in which we think, both rationally and irrationally, and influence our decisions. These two principles consist of consequentialism and deontology.
One of those most challenging areas I have experience during my current placement is ethical decision-making. We studied many possible scenarios during our Values, Ethics and Professional Issues class, and discussed the various types of decision-making models to help guide us when having to make difficult decisions. While the class was invaluable, because it helped me identify my own biases, and also shed light on how I have made decisions in the past and how I can possibly make decisions in the future, I knew that having to make real-life decisions would not be so cut and dry. This placement has been challenging for me, because my ongoing assignment with one of my supervisors requires constant ethical decision-making, sometimes even in the
