ipl-logo

Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

594 Words3 Pages

The “Is Google Making Us Stupid” is an acclaimed article located on several internet sites including its original source, The Atlantic Magazine. In the article, Nicholas Carr highlights the impacts of the internet on our brains by claiming that internet services such as Google trigger individuals to lose the deep reading, comprehending, and concentration that was once present in other resources such as books. Upon literarily analyzing the text type, it is evident that Carr exhibits a negative perspective towards the issue as he habitually only includes evidence that corroborates his thesis on the topic throughout the article from personal, scientific, and historical perspectives. Carr introduces readers to the topic by providing personal context towards the issue. He claims that Google has been tinkering and remapping his neural circuitry and memory as he says, “I feel as if I’m always dragging my wayward brain back to the text. The deep reading that used to come naturally has become a struggle,” (Carr, Nicholas). Carr’s negative attitude toward the issue is displayed through a …show more content…

In his article, Carr includes data obtained from a study by scholars from the University College London which states that people “go online to avoid reading in the traditional sense as users “’power browse”’ horizontally through titles, contents pages and abstracts,” (Carr Nicholas). Carr displays his negative attitude towards the issue through his selection of negative words and phrases such as avoid and “power browse” that impact his tone in the writing. He proceeds to include more scientific evidence supporting his cause from Maryanne Wolf and Friedrich Nietzsche. Similar to his personal context, Carr displays a negative attitude towards the issue through his choice of diction in providing context to the

Show More
Related
240 Words | 1 Pages

In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, the author suggests that modern technology is changing the way him and other people think. He argues that, in the past, it was much easier to engage in long readings. Now, he claims, reading is more challenging and people are more likely to skim a passage rather than fully absorb the information due to excessive use of the internet (313-314). Carr uses Friedrich Nietzsche’s relationship with his typewriter as an example to express that with every new technology, he warns, the human mind is vulnerable to a change in structure (319). Carr observes and suggests that the more people use and rely on computers, the more the human mind essentially becomes a form of artificial intelligence

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

Nicholas Carr makes claims about his own ideas supported by evidence from experts before providing his own rhetorical interpretation for his readers to consider. The question "Is Google Making Us Stupid" is posed by Nicholas Carr to determine whether our use of the internet has an impact on how our brains process written material. In order to connect with his audience, Carr employs ethos as a rhetorical strategy. He argues through the concept of ethos that the internet has produced a society where people are more concerned with getting quick information than setting aside time to read and relize an article.

Read More
406 Words | 2 Pages

In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr clearly states his thesis and the idea that not only is google changing the way we as humans think, read, and write, but all of technology is affecting us in our everyday lives. The internet sources such as Google are created to find information fast and easy for users. Google does all the searching and hard work of having to read through huge articles. We are humans have it easy now, we no longer have to do all the reading and digging around of endless articles and papers.

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

Concerns over the Increasing Use of the Internet Authored by Nicholas Carr, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” explores the danger of the increasing reliance on the internet to the human mind. Carr starts by sharing his own experience where he states that he feels that his thinking habits have changed with the rising use of the internet (Carr 2). Although he was a good reader a few years ago, his concentration level is now low, and he finds himself drifting after reading a few pages, which is a deep contrast to what he used years ago before he started using the internet. Carr observes that while the internet is a great source of information, it has far-reaching effects on how people read and think (Carr 2). Long gone are the days when one would carefully

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

One clear point I agree with from Carr is "I'm not thinking the way I used to think. I can feel it most strongly when I'm reading….I get fidgety, lose the thread, begin looking for something else to do. I feel as if I'm

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

It is almost like the web reprograms our minds to think differently. Carr proves that other people have noticed this problem by saying “When I mention my troubles with reading to friends and acquaintances – Literary types, most of them – many say they’re having similar experiences (Carr 733). This all comes back and proves carr’s theory is

Read More
1047 Words | 5 Pages

Add to this, Carr continued his essay by questioning if this was only happening to him or if there were others going through the same issue as him “I’m not the only one. When I mention my troubles with reading to friends and acquaintances- literary types, most of them- many say they’re having similar experiences (315). He

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

Thesis: The Internet, according to the author, is modifying the way that we read and take in knowledge through our senses. Carr recognized that he was losing his ability to read deeply into a text. When he sat down to read a short article, he caught himself skimming over the text. He became

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Later, Carr mentions Scott Karp and Bruce Friedman, Friedrich Nietzsche, who underwent the same problem as his, which seems to be an approach using ethos to gain credibility. However, he denies that by writing “Anecdotes don’t prove much.” (Carr 316). Then, switching for ethos to logos, he cites a study from University College London, explaining how internet users have the tendency to skim over articles, and to save web pages, but never return to them, but Carr doesn’t explain how it relates to his loss of focus or how it is making us “stupid”, which takes away the credibility he is trying to

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

This use of outside sources adds credibility to Carr's argument and reinforces the idea that the potential consequences of digital distraction are a legitimate concern. Throughout his essay, Carr uses a conversational tone and clear language to engage readers and make his argument more accessible. He employs rhetorical questions, such as "What if I do all my reading on the web not so much because the way I read has changed, but because the way I think has?" to encourage readers to consider the implications of his argument. By appealing to readers' emotions, logic, and sense of curiosity, Carr makes a persuasive case for the potential dangers of the internet and digital technologies on the human

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

Just like how we use to traditionally read, but now we gravitate towards what we are interested in and what is useful to us. In the third paragraph Carr talks about hyperlinks, Carr goes on about when we “power browse” it becomes much more helpful in seeing the depth of a subject that we are looking for. Another reason why Carr’s essay was unjustly biased is because included support about the good things about the internet is that the internet allows us to communicate on a whole other level that lets us see and read about different cultures without leaving the comforts of our homes. Online open forums like Reddit, Facebook, and Twitter, these sites that we use allow us to connect with people from all over the world can can also allow people to read about a certain topic that interests the people to view it and to discuss it with not only other people near their area, but with people who are also living in other regions. Before, it would be impossible to see photos of the flooding that took place in California or places like pro or anti Trump rallies that took place at that moment in time.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

The traditional sense of reading is by picking up a book or an article and actually reading not skim reading to find out the purpose of the text . Nowadays we have lost the ability to read a long article and analyze the text due to the powerful technology. Also now on the internet we would spent one mintent at look at something and move on to another. This can be supported by his experience on how he is no longer able to process information on a long reading and lost the memory to do so.

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

Nicholas Carr examines the relationship between not only the way we read but also the way we think and our increasing use of the Internet in his article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”. Carr believes that the use of the Internet has hindered our ability to concentrate and examine literature. Carr’s article contains a significant amount of anecdotal evidence, as well as some scientific research, which he includes in an attempt to support his stance; however, in my assessment the evidence Carr presents is ineffective in supporting his assertions. I will examine the flaws within Carr’s article, as well as the evidence utilized by Carr and evaluate the validity of his argument. Additionally, I will discuss research findings relevant to the subject matter to support my viewpoint that the Internet does not threaten our ability to narrow our focus and delve into a piece of literature.

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

The writer thinks that “And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplating” (57). Carr is explaining his problems that he has been having since he has the internet has took place of “old school” writing he has had problems thinking about anything intensely. The internet has made given our brains the ability to absorb information at a greater rate but it has also made it harder to read long articles the author says, “I skim it”(58) which mean writers are now having trouble reading along with the rest of the

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

He supports this argument by citing a study conducted by students who have attended The University College London. The study proved to us that we no longer thoroughly read material, rather we just skim over most of what we read. From the convoluted works of the late 19th century, to the material of present day, the way we write and comprehend

Read More

More about Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

Related Topics

Open Document