ipl-logo

Summary Of Nonviolent Resistance By Cesar Chavez

452 Words2 Pages

Labor union organizer and civil rights leader Cesar Chavez in his article in the magazine of religious organization establishes the argument about nonviolent resistance. Chavez’s purpose is to argue that nonviolence is a more effective way of bringing change. Chavez adopts a purposeful tone to convince his readers that nonviolence is the better option to resistance. Chavez presents his argument on nonviolent resistance by claiming that “Non-violence is more powerful than violence” (12). Chavez compares Non-violence and violence using diction. He positively describes non-violent protests as “powerful” and the protestors as “having a just and moral cause” (14). On the other hand, he negatively describes violence as “temporary successful, …show more content…

He uses cause and effect argumentation to make his argument dramatic and persuasive. The overall structure of his article follows this tool. Throughout his article, he supports non-violence and then uses the “If” clause to strengthen the effectiveness of nonviolence by dissuading violence. For example he states in line 66-68 “If we beat the growers at the expense of violence, victory would come at the expense of injury and perhaps death”. The author uses this cause and effect sentence to make readers understand that violence leads to bad and dangerous results, persuading them to side with non-violence. To strengthen and provide credibility to his argument, Chavez uses credible peaceful protesters in the past in order to gain the support of his readers. In the article, Chavez uses Gandhi, a respectable and recognizable peaceful protestor to allude to the success of peaceful protest because Gandhi was able to win back India from the British Empire using “boycott as an instrument of non-violent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in cause” (63-65). This implies that non-violence is successful because it attracts people’s support in contrast to demoralization and death. By using examples from history and contrasts, Chavez is able to portray non-violence as the better option to resistance, as it attracts the people’s support, and it is proved to be safe and

Show More
Related
544 Words | 3 Pages

Everyone Is Equal Terrorist attacks, school shootings, corruption, ISIS assassinating Americans, is all you hear in the news nowadays. Cesar Chavez puts us in the hotspot, is violence the answer? Can there be a world without atomic bombs and guns? Cesar Chavez believes it. Labor union organizer and civil rights leader Cesar Chavez published an article where it's aim was to renew the minds of Americans that nonviolence is the best policy for everyone.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

All throughout history violence has existed; it has been described in textbooks, in videos, and in the media. Whenever and strikes have occurred, or there was a resistance against oppressive power, have resorted to physical combat. Cesar Chavez, author of an article published in the magazine of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need, looks down upon violence, but is a strong advocate for peace. In this excerpt, he claims that not only is nonviolence necessary for the welfare of society, but is actually more beneficial than violence. Through the use of the persuasive appeals pathos and logos, Chavez alternates between positive and negative diction to show that nonviolent resistance is crucial and powerful when fighting

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

In the speech Chavez says, “We are also convinced that nonviolence is more powerful than violence.” He then goes on to say that violence causes deaths and demoralizes the people, while nonviolence attracts people’s support and is morally just. The use of juxtaposition as a rhetorical device throughout the whole speech shows the pros of nonviolence and the cons of violence. This technique helps Chavez develop his argument because it creates a favorable bias

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

On the tenth year anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights activists, published an article about violence and nonviolence. The speaker in this article, Cesar Chavez, addresses the citizens of every country. The purpose for Chavez to write this is to show the reader how nonviolence and violence can lead to many different outcomes. The subject of this piece is civil rights. Throughout his article Chavez develops his argument of nonviolent protests by using logos, allusions, and tone.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

The 60's was the height of the Civil Rights Movement in America, and Dr. Martin Luther King was one of the most prominent leaders of the movement. The philosophy of fighting back against oppression through nonviolent protest, something that was soon adapted by many different activists for different causes at this time once it began to be proved effective. Cesar Chavez writes this article in remembrance of Dr. King, as well as to gain the support of many Christians to his protest of the treatment of many Mexicans migrants in America. In his article Cesar Chavez uses rhetorical devices such as compare and contrast, ethos, and references to pursue his religious audience that nonviolent protest will help get the best outcome as oppose to violence. Chavez uses contrast to convince his audience that supporting his cause is the right thing to do by stating the outcome of nonviolence as opposed to violence many times throughout the article.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr was a social activist, who led the Civil Rights Movement in the United States from the mid-1950s until his death by assassination in 1968. On the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer, writes an article all about nonviolent resistance that includes teachings from Dr. King. Chavez employs various uses of personification and repetition to exhort the workers to use nonviolence in their efforts for equality.

Read More
538 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez, an author and strong supporter of nonviolent resistance who has been influenced by many before him. He displays his ideas of supporting nonviolent resistance on the tenth anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s death. King was a labor union organizer and civil rights leader and it is obvious to see that Dr. King was a strong influence on Chavez. He makes his argument clear with the help of ethos, allusions, and antithesis throughout the passage. Widely known Dr. King was someone who knew nonviolent resistance could make a change in society but it would just take time.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

This ultimately explains how nonviolence is effective, justifies it, and makes it more favorable than violence. Chavez’s use of repetition, generalizations, and credibility effectively persuades everyone of nonviolence. In using multiple strategies, he constantly provides ways of nonviolence’s betterment compared to the pitfalls plaguing violence, and does so,

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

Labor union organizer and civil rights leader Cesar Chavez wrote to his audience of followers of a religious organization on the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr to assert the importance of using nonviolent methods needed to incite change. Throughout the essay he explains that nonviolence is a powerful tool that should be used to incite change over the use of violence. By using logical arguments, relatable feelings through pathos, and emotionally charged words through diction, Chavez is able to convey to his audience that nonviolence should be chosen over violent means. In the beginning of the essay, Chavez’s use of logical arguments helps the audience realize the potential and importance of nonviolence starting

Read More
429 Words | 2 Pages

He says, “If we restore to violence: one of two things will happen: either the violence will escalate and there will be many injuries… non-violence has exactly the opposite effect”. This comparison is meant for the audience to visualize the effects violence and non-violence has. It also shows that there are many cons to violence, that not only affect the people but the world too. Using this fake scenario of what could happen, Chavez influences the audience by helping them understand that in the long run non-violence has better effects and it’s less harmful to the

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

The civil right movement is what caused others to be devoted to nonviolence. Cesar wanted people to realize that violence only causes death and oppression toward the ones who want freedom while nonviolence allows you to grab the attention of many in order to solve a greater issue. Chavez’s essay uses many rhetorical choices that includes appeal to history, pride, and morality; all of these help him convey the idea that nonviolence is better than violence because violence only causes injustice and casualties. The rhetorical choices make his argument more relatable to the audience. First and foremost, Chavez uses history in order to portray to the reader that history has shown violence has potential deadly consequences.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

Non violence protest has been practiced by multiple people all over the world, and it has shown to be successful. Specifically Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with his form of non violence within the Civil Rights Movement. He is a legend, he has influenced many people to follow his tactics, in order to make the world a better place and to progress the country. Cesar Chavez is a Civil Rights Leader himself and writes an article on DR. King’s 10 year anniversary of his untimely death and his article was on how non violence protests are better than any form of violence by using elements of pathos and ethos.

Read More
1042 Words | 5 Pages

Cesar Chavez uses logical reasoning, logos, to explain why nonviolence will always work better than violence when trying to bring about change. This type of reasoning appeals to the audience’s intelligence, daring the reader to think over the logic of the argument, or a specific point in the argument. Chavez explains exactly why violent protests are wrong and why they can only end badly “If we resort to violence, then one of two things will happen: either the violence will be escalated and there will be many injuries and perhaps deaths on both sides, or there will be total demoralization of the workers. ”(Chavez lines 17-21). Another point that he highlights later in the piece that resonates deeply, is that violence only creates more violence, a sentiment voiced by many nonviolence activists such as Pope Francis “Violence

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

“We advocate militant nonviolence as our means of achieving justice for our people, but we are not blind to the feeling of frustrations, impatience and anger” ( L.45 prompt). Chavez writes of an understanding referring to the positive effects of nonviolent resistance and the negative impact violence has on justice for minorities. He demonstrates a use of ethos, an appeal to the reader’s emotions, and their moral standards throughout his writing. He supports his point of nonviolent protest being the best solution to expresses a just and moral cause by using counter arguments and repetition of ideas. This article explores the possibilities that are within reach for the people who practice nonviolent strategies, and this passage explains the tactics

Read More
279 Words | 2 Pages

He also very systematically explains the thinking process of the people involved in the various nonviolent demonstrations. However, in contrast to his previously succinct and to the point sentences, paragraph 14 contains an extremely long and detailed sentence. Here, he also changes from simply addressing the reader to actually attempting to put the reader

Read More

More about Summary Of Nonviolent Resistance By Cesar Chavez

Open Document