ipl-logo

Summary Of The Clarkson Vs. Orkin Determinating Co. Inc.

557 Words3 Pages

Introduction The Clarkson v. Orkin Exterminating Co. Inc. case took place in the year 1985. Mrs. Clarkson sued Orkin Exterminating Co. Inc. for three distinct charges. Orkin had a contract with both the previous owner of which Mrs. Clarkson inherited after purchasing the house. The agreement stated that Orkin Exterminating Company was to be paid a certain amount of money to handle exterminating practices in this case; spraying of termites. Upon the completion of this, the contract also stated that the exterminating firm was to offer free exterminating services if at all there was a recurrence of the above-stated issue. Mrs. Clarkson moved to court claiming that Orkin had failed to deliver its end of the bargain. In what way did Orkin breach its duty? …show more content…

The company was mandated by the contract to ensure that the house had no termite infection. This was not the case as a representative of the company sent to check on Mrs. Clarkson’s allegation reported back that there was no termite infection. The plaintiff was then forced to seek the services of another exterminating company that was able to certify that indeed there was a termite infection. The termites had also destroyed the wood under the house of which they damaged, and the plaintiff used her own money to replace and repair them. First and foremost, the defendant breached the contract of its duties by lying that there were no termites in the house when indeed the insects were present. Second, upon Mrs. Clarkson ascertaining that there were indeed termites in the property, Orkin which was supposed to offer free retreatment of the property did not. Mrs. Clarkson was then forced to seek the services of another company and had to use her own money for the services that Orkin was supposed to offer at no

Show More
Related
302 Words | 2 Pages

1. Local residents from the rural area of Thibodaux plan to sue McIntry Realty because of their plans to redevelop a local farm to accommodate five hundred homes. Hector Salvador, attorney for the residents, plans to file suit against Eugene McIntry because McIntry possible violated their rights. McIntry plans to counter-sue the city if they interfere with his plans to redevelop the land.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Mitchell made the foregoing misrepresentations of fact to and concealed the true facts from Mildo/Perlow when he sold the house to them with the intent of inducing them to purchase it. Mitchell intended or had reason to expect that the misrepresentations and half-truths would be repeated to subsequent purchasers of the residents who would rely on them. The Court held that despite Mitchell was two sales removed from the plaintiff, he used his construction expertise to conceal the true condition of the property and knew there was a strong likelihood that the deception would be passed on to a subsequent

Read More
645 Words | 3 Pages

Defendant: City of East Cleveland Ohio; claims in defense; defeat Plaintiffs motion to allow grandson in her dwelling. 5. Trial Court action: Judgment for the plaintiff, Inez Moore. 6.

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

The defendant, Gold Kist, Inc., claimed that their company had not committed any such trespass to Faulk’s land. The defendant did not intentionally commit a trespass onto the land, as they were always careful to operate the plant avoiding fertilizer spills, but quickly and thoroughly cleaning any that did occur. The defendant also claimed that the death of Faulk’s fish was not due to runoff via a drainage ditch from his plant, but could have been several other

Read More
364 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of Timothy Ivory Carpenter V. UNITED STATES Did the government overstep its bounds in Detroit without getting a probable cause warrant, and did the government violated the 4th amendment of Timothy Ivory Carpenter? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,but upon probable cause, the police have the right to searched, and the persons or things to be seized. That is the 4th amendment. So what are the facts of the case then? (“United States v. Carpenter.”

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

• Some Cases related to Company’s Liability in respect of Tort I. Bettel et al. v. Yim, (1978), 20 O.R. (2d) In 1976, Howard Bettel and some friends entered Ki Yim’s store. After the boys began acting outrageously, an employee asked them to leave. Instead of immediately leaving the property, the boys went to the front of the store and began throwing wooden matches on the sidewalk.

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

Case Analysis: Trinity Western v. Law Society of Upper Canada In the following court case between Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, Judges MacPherson, Cronk, and Pardu JJ, at the Ontario Court of Appeal, determine whether to grant accreditation to a private Christian University, that wants to open its own law school. The three-judge panel analyzes the Law Society of Upper Canada’s (LSUC) decision to not accredit Trinity Western’s proposed law facility, which took place in April 2014. The judges consider the Charter rights at stake, as well as the LSUC’s mandate. The case of TWU v. LSUC will be thoroughly examined, with a specific focus on key concepts that influence law-making, such as social development and change,

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

The Ashwander V Tennessee Authority case was argued December 19th 1935. McReynolds claimed that the Tennessee Valley Authority Act was unconstitutional while Brandeis was concurring for it. Brandeis collected and presented the Ashwander rules in the case, which are a set of rules which state that the constitutionality of an internal issue between shareholders should not be disputed or taken too literally. The TVA was firstly signed by President Roosevelt May 18th, 1933. This act was put into place as a part of the New Deal, involved with the intent to help Americans out of the depression and improve the economy of the Country.

Read More
807 Words | 4 Pages

The Rhalys’ homes were flooded twice- first on July 30, 2002, and again on April 6,200.3. After the first flood, the Rhalys brought suit against the city, alleging that the ditch had not been properly maintained, and against BFI, Inc. and Waste Management of Mississippi, Inc., alleging that they each negligently placed a dumpster too close to the ditch. After the 2003 flood, the Rhalys brought another suit, alleging that the second flood had been caused the same way, except that it involved only a single dumpster owned by Waste Management. The trial court consolidated the two cases. The City timely filed answers to Rhalys’ suits, but trial court struck the answers as a sanction for a discovery violation.

Read More
1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Our client, Lee Logan, resides at 55 Bogus Hill Road, New Fairfield, Connecticut. Logan is concerned that his neighbors’ twelve-foot, wooden, stockade fence will damage his prize-winning dahlias and would like an injunction for its removal. About year ago, the Prestons moved into the house adjacent to Logan’s home. When the Prestons went to introduce themselves, Logan was sick in bed and the maid greeted them instead. Logan believes this incident led the Prestons to think negative of him because he heard rumors that the Prestons were calling him a “rich snob.”

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

On September 2, 1974, Ehrlich A. Coker a convicted rapist, murderer, and overall felon that had been previously sentenced to three (3) life sentences plus 20 years, as well as an eight (8) year prison term had managed to escape. While on the run, Coker entered the residence of Elnita and Allen Carver without permission and threatened the couple. Mr. Coker proceeded to tie up Mr. Carver, steal Mrs. Carver’s money and car keys. Mrs. Carver was subsequently raped and kidnapped by Coker. It was upon Mr. Carver managing to free himself that he was then able to notify police of the events that had taken place.

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

Barker v. Wingo 407 U.S. 54 (1972) Tomica Brown-Wright Strayer University SOC 205 Society, Law, and Government Dr. Terry Lunsford October 26, 2014 Introduction According to Justia (2014) Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case that tried the determinations of whether or not the Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial for defendants in criminal cases have been violated must be made on a case-by-case basis, and set forth four factors to be considered in the determination the (1) length of delay there isn’t an absolute time limit that is just one factor used in determining whether a speedy trial has been denied.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

White America will always have an advantage over blacks and it will continue to be this way, whether we would like to admit it or not. African Americans had the same capabilities to do anything a white American could, if not better in many circumstances. Unhappy with the hardships that challenged blacks’ freedom throughout their life, enslaved African American, Dred Scott, made a significant impact which eventually changed the views of slavery. Thus, the court ruling of the Dred Scott v. Sanford was established in 1857 which declared that slaves nor black men who were already free could be granted citizenship in the United States (Dred Scott v. Sandford, n.d.). Scott v Sanford court case was created to emphasize the wrongdoings of slave masters by expressing the poorly acts African Americans face while under the Declaration of Independence.

Read More
2253 Words | 10 Pages

The plaintiff, claimed that it was defendant’s duty to have a system of work and inspection sufficient to prevent snails getting in to ginger beer

Read More

More about Summary Of The Clarkson Vs. Orkin Determinating Co. Inc.

Open Document