Summary Of The Crisis Of World Order By James Stavridis

710 Words3 Pages

Every human being has got the fundamental right to peace and to live and this can only be achieved when every person begin by respecting themselves and then also respecting the core being of their neighbors. ISIS, as a group of people, feels pleasure in causing pain, terror unto the others and making the earth quite inhabitable. This paper will address on how to cope with the challenges posed by ISIS drawing arguments and making critics on Robert Kagan’s” The Crisis Of World Order” and James Stavridis ”Killing The Islamic State Softly”. I believe it is important to unify the world and to face the same enemy, and the best strategy for that is establish a peace treaty with the Islamic nation. There are some strategies to counter the challenges …show more content…

The author addressed “All of this will be expensive and hard, but compared to the alternative — simply relying on bombs or guns to defeat the Islamic State — it will be more efficient and effective, especially over the long term”(Stavrid) in the article. I believe creation of sufficient job opportunities are better ways to absorb and use the population who graduate from the colleges and universities efficiently. In this way, it can potentially help in reducing the population, especially youth, which can be hurt by the …show more content…

Thus investing on the intelligence unit would be more appropriate. In case of the ISIS would execute their missions base on the secret complex strategies that they had planned, it is obviously that we cannot fight back by any measure involves violence. Thus, thirdly, I disagree with this part of Robert Kagan’s words “…there could be bloodshed and violence, even mass killing in Syria and Libya and elsewhere, and some instability in Iraq- but the fighting, and its affected, and America`s own interests would not be directly threatened so long as good intelligence and drone strikes prevented terrorist attacks on U.S” (Kagan). Mass killing and blood shed will lead to a huge loss of innocent human beings and properties that in most cases the target people are not even can be found afterward. It is nothing different than the horrible things the ISIS had done to people. Therefore we have to come up with solutions that have no threat to ordinary innocent people. Another way that I believe could help in tightening security measures involve controlling the civil rights over ownership of weapons, keeping a track record of weapons handling and implementing such policies that would minimize weapon handling among he civilian. This would help to minimize the access to weapons by the ISIS and also reduce the causalities caused