ipl-logo

Summary Of The Righteous Mind By Jonathan Haidt

1243 Words5 Pages

The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt is an excellent piece of literature that provides an intuitive look into the minds of human beings to explain why certain political and religious beliefs are formulated, why and how people defend these beliefs, and how it can polarize people with relative ease. By examining the morality and psychology of humans, it allows the reader to not only look at other’s beliefs and convictions, but also look introspectively at who they are, what they believe, and just how “right” they are. While it may serve as a guide for how to discuss politics in a civil manner, I agree that it doesn’t exactly serve well as a guide to the actual American Political system, but to how political views are formulated, reinforced, and …show more content…

It examines how ethical, moral and psychological principles are present due to human evolution, and how moral foundations can affect a person’s political alignment, with focus being placed on the morals foundations behind conservatives and liberals rather than the political beliefs of these alignments, a large theme in the book that is ultimately a missed opportunity to educate about political parties, their beliefs, and role in American government. The author’s credentials as a moral psychologist rather than someone in a professional field regarding politics highlights that the credibility of political information in the book may be questionable, which is further reinforced by the fact that political bias is more likely seeing as Haidt sits on the more left side of the political spectrum as a liberal democrat, rather than being a politically neutral individual. Lastly, Haidt states several times in the introduction that the book’s focus is primarily on human history and moral psychology, rather than actual political substance. This is reinforced by the fact that the book is divided into three parts, with each part’s focus being placed on a different moral psychology principle rather than a part of American government. If the book was an effective teaching tool for American Politics, it would arguably have to be more than three parts to be effective, and the parts certainly wouldn’t focus on principles of moral psychology. I’m not knocking The Righteous Mind, or saying that it’s not academically useful whatsoever. I am saying that the book would be better suited for teaching in a belief-oriented course that focuses on psychology, ethics or morality, not a fact-oriented course that

Show More
Related
859 Words | 4 Pages

Political beliefs and party lines may be the most controversial topic across all of America. As the current Presidential debates and ensuing election draw near, most will make decisions, take sides, and debate across the supper table or in the local coffee shops. The American people will not be able to escape the debates since on most days some form of media is making their ideas and opinions known and open for discussion. Wendell Berry’s article, “Caught in the Middle,” is a select piece from his book Our Only World, which takes a look at his interpretation of politics in America as they currently stand. Controversial topics, such as abortion and homosexual marriages are discusses.

Read More
1206 Words | 5 Pages

In Savannah, Georgia on May 2, 1981, Jim Williams shot and killed a twenty one year old, Danny Hansford, in the Mercer house. Jim awaited four trials and eight years in jail until he was acquitted of all charges. In the novel, “In the Garden of good and evil,” by John Berendt, it vividly describes the prices people had to pay for their misdemeanors in Savannah, Georgia. Joe Odom, a con artist who had gone years dodging the government, Jim Williams and Danny Hansford, who paid deeply in which, resulted them six feet under the cold hard earth. Simply, every action has a price and eventually the day will come when it is time to pay up.

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

Ayn Rand states that “Nothing can corrupt and disintegrate a culture or a man’s character as thoroughly as does the precept of moral agnosticism” (Rand). It is the thought that “one must never pass moral judgement on others,” (Rand) and that “good consists of never distinguishing good from evil,” (Rand) that led to the worship of the word “we”. Equality understands that “The worship of the word ‘we’,” (102) is what caused men to fall “lower than his savage beginnings” (102). By failing to distinguish good from evil, wise from fools, and strong from the weak, human beings are falsely perceived as equals. As people fail to differentiate between one another, individualism is lost, and the word “we” becomes their master.

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

Within all democracies, a government’s power and sovereignty lie with its citizens. Undoubtedly, there lies an importance with the virtue and character of the citizenry, as they are inherently responsible for dictating the direction of a government’s policy and laws. Over the course of American history, many politicians and scholars have come to similar conclusions regarding the importance of moral citizens. However, statesmen have shared varying levels of concern for government’s role in developing such citizens. Some of the first groups to debate this were the Antifederalists and Federalists.

Read More
1932 Words | 8 Pages

Does environment shape moral and psychological traits? Are humans born inherently with pre-determined qualities and ways of thought? The debate of nature versus nurture, whether humans are born with a set of moral traits or whether one’s environment influences and shapes their traits, has constantly been argued, not only from a psychological standpoint, but also from a literary perspective as well. In A Prayer for Owen Meany, John Irving explores the relationship between environment and the development of psychological traits and personal conceptions, using both animate objects, like voice and people, and inanimate objects, such as armless objects and family influences, to prove the often powerful, yet overlooked influence of environment on human development; in the

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Starting in the 1730s, a movement formally known as the Great Awakening was born. This marked the beginning of a religious and spiritual revival that was a direct response to Enlightenment ideals which highlighted logic instead of spirituality. A leader in this movement was Jonathan Edwards; a theologian that delivered one of the most influential sermons of its time; a sermon titled Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God. In this sermon, Edwards employed the use of cherry picking from a credible source and the use of a threatening tone to convey his message - that one would be saved from the wrathful judgment of God if they obediently followed the Bible and its teachings.

Read More
1507 Words | 7 Pages

Thus, following this theory, questions of morality can only be acquired through social learning. However, in Pinker’s opposition to this idea, he insists that together with the Noble Savage and Ghost in the Machine theories, the Blank Slate theory expresses a denial of human nature that is inspired by political considerations drawn from fears of inequality, imperfectability, determinism, and nihilism (Pinker, 137-194). Therefore, his biological and genetic-based assumptions have a connection to politics by challenging the typical liberal notions of equality and social justice. It is essential to note, however, that Pinker does not attribute human behavioral outcomes to genetics exclusively. He points out early in the book's preface that it will not be one of those that "says everything is genetic" (Pinker, viii).

Read More
1417 Words | 6 Pages

Morality is often viewed as a fixed set of principles that influence our behavior and decision-making, however, certain aspects of morality are universal and dynamic depending on the cultural, societal and behavioral context. While some principles are fixed, others have shifted with the changing society, making it a complex and multifaceted concept over time. In “The Moral Instinct,” Steven Pinker argues that morality is subjective and needs to change from time to time because it is highly influenced by context, culture, religion, and human emotions, ultimately making it universal but, at the same time, very particular; This concept can be seen in David Sedaris’s “Picka Pocketoni,” where he narrates an anecdote of encountering an American tourists

Read More
287 Words | 2 Pages

In order to understand why rural and working-class Americans tend to support Republicans, it is crucial to understand social intuitionist model. In Chapter 8 of his “The Righteous Mind,” Haidt presents a Durkheimain vision of society, which explains this model. In a Durkheimian society, the basic social unit is not the individual, but the hierarchically structured family. A Durkheimain society values self-control over self-expression, duty over rights, and loyalty to one’s group. Rural Americans tend to be more religious and have tighter family bonds (of course, there are exceptions) than people from urban areas, so the Durkheimain society model characterizes them better than a Millian model, which rests exclusively on Care and Fairness foundations.

Read More
797 Words | 4 Pages

Since childhood, politics and political thought have been important to me. I grew up in a family and school system that was made up of mostly strong conservatives, so I was not surprised by my results on the political typology quiz, which ranked me as a “steadfast conservative”. Although these views may have been implanted by the environment I grew up in, I have formulated my own thoughts on politics in recent years, and they all seem to align closely with conservative values. The factors that have undoubtedly had the greatest influence on my political socialization are my family, my religion, and my schooling. Growing up in a conservative family obviously has a great impact on a person’s political views.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

In The Stranger, the crucifix appears to represent Christianity, a religion that Monsieur Meursault refuses to believe in or accept. Additionally, it represents rational beliefs that the magistrate attempts to thrust upon Meursault. He wants Meursault to accept God so that his sin will be forgiven. However, Meursault rejects the notion that his life have any significance or rational explanation.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More
983 Words | 4 Pages

In the first chapter of Political Ideology and the Democratic Ideal by Terence Ball and Richard Dagger, the concept of ideology is brought about. The authors’ see ideology not as the study of ideas, but rather how ideas find their way to connect with an action. Ideology can explain and evaluate why people act how they do. People can understand why they act how they do which allows for social and political action. In this essay I intend to explain the four functions of ideology, how the authors differentiate between “political ideology” and other concepts, define human nature and freedom, and reflect on nationalism in modern US politics.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

We as people like to be in the majority, but often times the ideas we believe to be our own are often influenced by other people. Is this freedom or are we creating a false sense of freedom by our interpretation? Conclusion Justice by Michael Sandel presents many different views on what morality is and how different group perceives it. I enjoyed the first half of this book and found it fascinating how different groups determine what is moral or not.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

For the majority of my life thus far, I had believed that we as humans had a predestined fate as the Bible implied. Both of my parents were relatively religious Catholics and raised my siblings and I based on their beliefs. After moving to the United States as six-year-old, I understood the general Christian beliefs, not subscribing to any religion in particular mainly because I did not know what religion was. One day, my family was approached by Mormon missionaries and welcomed to attend their service, so we did. I was baptised into the Mormon religion at the age of nine, which I always questioned since I had also been baptised in the Catholic church as an infant.

Read More

More about Summary Of The Righteous Mind By Jonathan Haidt

Related Topics

Open Document