ipl-logo

Supreme Court's Ruling In Favor Of Phelps Essay

445 Words2 Pages

What are the arguments that support the Supreme Court 's ruling in favor of Phelps? The arguments that supported the supreme court are that they were attending a public event, they were protesting from a far distance that was approved by the state of maryland, the had organized the protest with the local police department and did not interrupt the service. What are some arguments in support of Snyder, the soldier 's father who claims he was harmed by the Phelps ' protest? The arguments in support of Snyder are that they targeted his son. Which was overturned by the supreme court because they were saying nation issues like "America Is Doomed" and "Fag Troops" and "Priests Rape Boys," which does not attack the son directly but in directly and they said all of those things on public property. Do you support the Court’s decision? Why or why not? I do support the court decision in siding with Phelps. I support the decision …show more content…

If you think there should be limits to free speech, then who decides what should be restricted and where do you draw the line? If you think there should NEVER be limits on free speech, how do we justify allowing reckless speech that hurts others? I think we should have limits to freedom of speech. The limits we have in place right now are all that we need which is not being able to shout out something the cause chaos. For example being on a plane and yelling bomb or being in a crowded room and yelling fire when there is no bomb or fire. Yelling those things will cause people to panic and can cause problems and might injure people. Everything else should be protected under the first amendment. A quote from Benjamin Franklin, “Without Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as publick Liberty, without Freedom of Speech; which is the Right of every Man, as far as by it, he does not hurt or control the Right of another: And this is the only Check it ought to suffer, and the only Bounds it ought to

Show More
Related
481 Words | 2 Pages

Bethel School District v Fraser is a pivotal case heard by the United States Supreme Court in 1986. Broadly, the case involved the freedom of speech provided by the First Amendment to the US Constitution, its exercise and its limitation within the boundaries of a public school. The whole matter started during a school meeting organized by the Bethel School District (high school) in Washington State . On the 26th April of 1983, a student by the name of Matthew Fraser, 18 years old, gave a nomination speech to support the candidacy of one of his friend Jeff Kuhlman. The later, was seeking an elected position within the school student government board.

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Yes, we are allowed freedom of speech, but should there be a limit on this freedom? We can only justify these points based on the Bible. Ephesians 4:29 states this point quite well. “Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but that which is good to the use of edifying that it may minister grace unto the hearers.” Ephesians shows that we may use the law of freedom of speech only when what proceeds out of our mouth is edifying and useful to the situation and to those around us.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

Today the trial, Scott V. Missouri, which was Dred Scott, a slave owned by Irene Emerson, suing for his freedom, had taken place. The trial had started out with a witness for prosecution, who stated that due to Dred Scott’s status as a slave, that he didn’t have any rights within the constitution. He went on to claim that the constitution only covered people and therefore, Dred Scott was only considered property and had no rights. In addition, the witness made the argument that due to Missouri law, Dred Scott was still considered a slave since he still resides within Missouri. During their argument, the Supreme Court questioned the witness about what the definition of a person was in the constitution and whose job it was to debate the Constitution.

Read More
1130 Words | 5 Pages

This censorship hurt them financially until later on when the public opinion over the Bush Administration and the War in Iraq had turned negative. This brings into thought a question: were the Dixie Chicks statement protected by the First Amendment? Many philosophers of free speech

Read More
610 Words | 3 Pages

America is pushing the constitution by trying to stop the freedom of speech, by the state governments and the capital. The first amendment (Freedom of speech) says “Freedom of speech is the concept of the inherent human right to voice one's opinion publicly without fear of censorship or punishment.” They are trying to stop us from saying what we want by shutting us up when the police come, we have the right to say what we want to, the police can’t stop it. They don’t want us to say what we want to because they think it will be hurtful to the government, like saying against a law they put out, or protesting to something they do. They are canceling out what we are trying to tell them.

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

Between the people of the United States and the federal government there is a social contract theory, in which the people give up as much power as needed for the federal government to promote the wellbeing of all. Thus, if a government stops protecting its people then they have to right to overthrow it and create a better government. The people are guaranteed the right to expressive conduct from the first amendment, but the line can become blurry in some instances on whether the occurrence is supported civil disobedience or not. Different people interpret the first amendment differently, allowing many times for people to claim having the right to proceed with their actions. Again, there are issues deciding whether people do or do not have the

Read More
1331 Words | 6 Pages

Kadyn King Professor Cavallo Texas Government 2306 31 March 2016 It is often expressed that certain topics are not to be made public, but to be kept private. One thing that you don’t hear many people talk about casually is abortion, especially in Texas. Abortion is a very serious topic that many people do not take lightly and feel very strongly about. There are two popular sides one being pro-life and the other being pro-choice. When looking at the two sides and trying to classify them on political sides any would agree that based on voting republican would be pro-life, while democrat would be classified as pro- choice.

Read More
1555 Words | 7 Pages

In addition, those in the camp in favor of, or those who support Roe v. Wade, all agree to keep abortions legal as said in Roe v. Wade The Untold Story of The Landmark Supreme Court Decision That Made Abortion Legal by Marian Faux. According to Faux, those that were and still are in favor of abortions, believe that women who wanted an abortion are allowed to due to pro-choice. Pro-choice supports those women who want abortions. They can get one

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

Borders of the First Amendment are at the center of the legal debates about free speech and hate speech. While free speech is considered to be a basic right, as the Supreme Court has given the right to free speech. However, when such "free speech" crosses the line and becomes a threat, the courts have stepped in and punished the speaker. First Amendment does not protect free speech that has the intention of doing harm or damage.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

This is where the contradiction of the first amendment and laws abide one another. Is it freedom of speech or is it a

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

The First Amendment states, congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This Amendment gives people the right to be free in the areas of religion, speech, right to assemble , and to petition. In particular, the freedom of speech is a luxury and something we as citizens take for granted. According to John Lovett who wrote an article called The Culture of Shut Up and also worked alongside, then- Senator Hillary Clinton and former President Barack Obama, one's voice is their power.

Read More
924 Words | 4 Pages

The First Amendment of The United States Constitution guarantees the Freedom of Speech, as

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Freedom of speech should not be limited, for it is a big part of having a "free society". Freedom of speech is being limited and restricted, and this needs to change. The one place that seems to be limited the most in the aspect of free speech is on colleges and universities. It seems that college students push away ideas and opinions of others they find to be disturbing or conflicting with their own views.

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

Still other people have too much inertia to get up and act. Now just hold on here a minute! Those aren’t valid reasons for making a pretty important decision like that! Did the reasons in favor receive a fair hearing? Did both the Pro and the Con side get taken into account?

Read More
1026 Words | 5 Pages

As human beings, we are all born with an entitlement of freedom of speech or synonymously known as freedom of expression as it is a basic human right. It is stated in the Federal Constitution and it is important for us human beings to protect our rights to freedom of speech and expression as it is the backbone for a democratic society. Having the right to express oneself freely without any restrictions is an essential part of what it means to be a free human being. Article 10 in the Federal Constitution states that; (a) every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression; (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; (c) all citizens have the right to form associations.

Read More

More about Supreme Court's Ruling In Favor Of Phelps Essay

Related Topics

Open Document