Sweatshirts from Sweatshops: Intellectual Standards and Logical Fallacies
The essay “Sweatshirts from Sweatshops” was a persuasive piece that covered the issues of companies overseas that thrive through the exploitations of its workers. The reading selection depicted the behind the scenes activities that actually occurs with the mistreated workers and also the morality of such treatments. Throughout the essay, the reader can assume the writer’s overall objective was to discourage their audience from wearing such attire until their school decides to switch their apparel supplier. The writer also violated a few universal intellectual standards as well as a few logical fallacies.
Universal intellectual Standards
One universal intellectual standard that was violated in the text was relevance. The first three sentences in the second paragraph covered details about the company “Transterra Textile” and its size of business as far as expansion. This was not relevant to the writer’s accusation and is not considered
…show more content…
Another universal intellectual standard that was violated was logic. In the second paragraph, the writer stated “In a recent tour of Transterra’s Honduran Factory, WorldWeave observers noticed some children who appeared to be as young as eleven or twelve working with dangerous fabric-cutting machines-in spite of local laws that prohibit anyone under the age of fourteen from doing factory work.” No one can determines a person’s age just by simply looking at an individual and if there are laws prohibiting such employment the companies must abide to them in order to stay in business or suffer the consequences. The workers should have