Recommended: Comparison between synecdoche and metonymy
A top-to-bottom relationship among the items in a database is recognized by a a) Hierarchical schema b) Network schema c) Relational schema d) None of the above Answer: a 38.
Through the use of anaphora, metaphor, and informative figurative language, Barry portrays the work of a scientist as challenging and complex. Barry begins by using patterns of repetition and anaphora in the first paragraph. He does this to strengthen the traditional recognition that certainty is good and uncertainty is bad. Providing these antithetical concepts of uncertainty v. certainty, or good v. bad, also strengthen his claim that the work of a scientist is challenging and complex. Next, Barry complicates our understanding of the nature of scientific research through the use of metaphor throughout the essay.
In his essay “The World of Doublespeak,” William Lutz define doublespeak as “a blanket term for language which makes the bad seem good, the negative appear positive, the unpleasant attractive, or at least tolerable” (2013). Lutz goes on to claim “It is language which avoids, shifts, or denies responsibility” (2013). He explains the purpose of doublespeak is to “mislead, distort, deceive, inflate” (2103). Based on many of his examples, such as wording an airplane as an airplane that has had “uncontrolled contact with the ground,” or referring to a city slum as the resident of the “fiscal underachievers,” I feel he may overstate his own definition of doublespeak. While, the play on words in these examples does attempt to deceive the read and
1. The line “We lived on a combination of irregular paychecks, hope, fear, and government surplus food” is a hyperbole and zeugma. The word that creates the zeugma is the word lived, as the narrator uses the word lived to mean different things in the same context. The narrator actually lived off of paychecks and government food, but did not literally live off of hope and fear like the line suggests. The line is also a hyperbole because the author did not literally live off of the hope and fear, as you cannot sustain yourself with emotions.
The descriptive passage above taken from, How the other Half Lives by Jacob A. Riis, demonstrates the isolation of the Chinese community from the rest of New York. Riis uses figurative language such as hyperbole, metaphor, and quotation, as well as other literary devices, to depict the Chinaman as an embodiment of Chinatown itself, where the cultural aspects are portrayed through the man and his doings. The descriptive passage I wrote as an imitation demonstrates how the eyes take in factual information which is then distorted by perception and outside influential factors. I used the same types of figurative language to depict vision as an embodiment of truth as well as trickery. The concept is displayed through the eyes and what they see.
A metaphor twists words to use as referral of another subject. Trevor has many examples of this throughout his book. In his conversations about poverty, he references the hood as a comfortable place. But poverty can cause may stress as one barley scraps enough together to pay the bills. Everyone is barley getting by and live a repetitive lifestyle which gives people a feeling on comfort, “The hood was strangely comforting, but comfort can be dangerous.
Lady Gardner-Wright Elizabeth Trayal English 1010 110 20 October 2014 Rhetorical Analysis George, a common name, has several connotations according to Henry Louis Gates, In his essay “What’s in a name?” he remembers time during the civil rights era when racism was a prevalent he and his father stopped by their local dinner for ice cream and although Mr. Wilson, a local, greeted him knowing his name he called him George, instead. Henry, being young was confused. Gates purpose of this essay is to inform the reader that then even a simple name as simple as George can be derogatory and worse than being called jigaboo which was a common name blacks were called in that era.
The metaphors main goal is to take an existing thought in the audiences mind and affiliate it with a message or concept (usually persuasive) that the author has in mind, therefore using the metaphor as a sort of medium of vehicle to propel the targeted concept for the audience to a meaningful resting point were an agreement of the idea can be reached. Metaphors allow the author of persuasive discourse to use fewer words when conveying persuasive thoughts. The aspect of language economy comes to mind here, simply put the fewer complex words needed, the likelihood of agreeableness with the use of metaphors is obtainable. The society of North America is filled with metaphors the people associate with in order to not only justify actions, but to also convey messages that are hard to explain with multiple words. People use elaborate metaphors for multiple means which can be effective with the economy aspect of language usage.
So, the issue of dead metaphors is different from the issue of referentially used definite descriptions. Hence, the example of a dead metaphor’s getting a semantic meaning does not provide a strong ground for Devitt’s view that the
I think the eagle, jigsaw puzzle sports team and the whale metaphors are more appropriate than the apple, family unity, telephone system, devouring monster and the Frankenstein monster metaphors are because they talk about the positive and the deviances of the metaphor not just the deviance the metaphor
According to Metaphors We Live By by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, metaphors are used for “understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another” (pg 6). In other words, a metaphor is explaining or describing one thing as if it was something else. They explain two kinds of metaphors in the book. The first type of metaphor that the book mentions is a “structural metaphor” in which “one concept is metaphorically structured in terms of another” (pg 15). The other type the book mentions is an “orientational metaphor” which “organizes a whole system of concepts with respect to one another” (pg 15).
Metaphor – A Solid Argument Even in the most commonplace discourse, it is hardly possible to venture a few steps without treading on dozens of metaphors. – Guy Deutscher In chapter 4 of his book The Unfolding of Language, Guy Deutscher posits that the bulk of the words in human languages are metaphors.1 He proposes that the earliest human words described simple, solid concepts – particularly, parts of the body.1 From the location of body parts came descriptions of space: to be at the head of an army means to be in front of it; to be in the heart of something is to be located at its center.1 With spatial concepts squared away, Deutscher says, humans were free to extend the meanings of our words to include concepts of time.1 Prepositions used to describe space – “at the door”, “within the prison” – became markers of time: “at noon”, “within a year”.1 Finally, says Deutscher, these temporal terms acquired even more abstract meanings, and could be used to describe such things as causes and reasons.1 Therefore a meeting can be held at the town square, at one o’clock, at the request of the mayor – or in the treehouse, in an hour, in secret.
The target example is the notion of conceptual metaphor theory from the analogy lecture. However, the lecture does not explain why we use and enjoy metaphors? I will discuss why metaphors are wildly admired using the base example of pattern recognition. Conceptual metaphors refer to the apprehension of one idea, or theoretical realm, in terms of another. It is the theory
Before the publication of Lolita, Vladimir Nabokov a Russian-born writer was not widely known in English-speaking literary circles as most of his early work had not yet been translated from Russian. After Lolita was rejected by four American publishers, Nabokov’s French agent sent it to Olympia Press in Paris, which quickly published it. Although Olympia published many controversial works by writers such as Jean Genet, it was notorious for cheap editions of pornographic books. Many readers, expecting salacious fun, were disappointed by the book’s lack of overtly sexual content and dismayed by its demanding style. Still, others attacked it as immoral.
When reading newspapers or listening to politicians we usually receive this kind of messages. “The mayor cleaned up Pinamar” or “The mayor builds roads” or, as members of other political parties use to say “The Mayor is doing notinhg”. Speakers want to go beyond the words, and they use metaphorical
