ipl-logo

Tacit Consent In The Declaration Of Independence

1663 Words7 Pages

The Declaration of Independence notes that state’s derive “their powers from consent governed”. In this essay I will argue that the state has the right to rule as we consent to its power, we express our consent through tacit consent. This essay will also analyse the issues faced by tacit consent. The state’s legitimate right to rule derives from the equally legitimate consent given as part of the social contract
The issue of whether the state has a legitimate right to rule over us, arises as many political philosophers argue that we are free agents, which leads to two issues, autonomy, and welfare. The autonomy issue arises as individuals are free to express their autonomous will, free of interference, however state authority clashes with autonomy. The welfare issue arises as individuals should be free to pursue their conception of good life, aspirations and, desires, however, once again state authority clashes with welfare. …show more content…

It resolves issues of individual freedom and state power as giving consent is permission for the state to rule and place restrictions in the form of legislation. Consent theorists argue that state interference is not harmful as, if we consent to the state having the right to rule over us and we believe that they are acting in our best interest, then state power is not harmful and there is no welfare issue and thus the state has the right to rule. In addition, consent also deals with the autonomy issue of individual freedom as if individuals consent to the state’s right to rule over us, they consent as free agents and therefore the state ruling is consistent with autonomy and nor is it an

Show More
Related
427 Words | 2 Pages

Unit 1-Question 3 Written in 1776, the Declaration of Independence is often claimed to be the most profound document in history. The Declaration of Independence was the first time the Natural Rights philosophy was used to claim that sovereignty resides in the people. This concept is profound because the rights of the people where based on a higher written law rather than laws made by a few select officials. The Declaration states that all men are created equal, as neither God nor nature has appointed some at birth to rule over others.

Read More
271 Words | 2 Pages

In John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, Locke details the role of a government and the conditions under which it is just to resist one’s government. Locke asserts that the government’s duty is to preserve the rights and welfare of its subjects (Locke, 84). This shows that a government that doesn’t respect subjects’ rights is worthy of resistance, a concept still relevant today.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Locke says that in order for us to get out of the state of nature, it is a two-stage process. First, we must unanimously consent to construct a civil society. Going into a civil society requires unanimous consent because everyone needs to give up some of their rights, such as the right to punish. Nobody can take any person's rights away from them, only the people themselves can give up those rights if they so wish. Once a civil society is formed and everyone has transferred some rights to the whole group, a commonwealth can be formed.

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Name- Abel Kebede Date- 12/02/2017 Course-Philosophy The Defense of Anarchism Anarchism believes in autonomy, self-governance. It regards a state has no right in imposing rules and regulations on individual’s free choice and actions and argue that the individuals have a right to govern themselves. Prominent philosophers who have supported this view are Benjamin Tucker and Henery Thoreau, however, in this essay, I will be arguing against Robert Paul’s the defense of anarchism.

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

The result is unappealing for a normative account of human rights, as both the rights and the obligations become “special, not universal” (431). However, O'Neill identifies the “deepest problem” to be that the obligations attributed to states are second-order, namely to “secure” the respect of liberty rights and “ensure” the fulfilment of rights to goods and services (433). The issue is that first-order obligations are the counterparts of the rights described instead (434). She argues that the state relegates first-order obligations to individuals, who become the “beneficiaries” of obligations while bearing their “burden” (436). Ultimately, she voices concern that overburdening 'the farmer and the physician' may diminish both their willingness of provide their respective services and the quality of their labour

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

By what right does the government demand by obedience? Why should I obey the government? What is the justification of government? What is supreme authority? How much authority does the state have?

Read More
1429 Words | 6 Pages

This powerful statement by Plato reflects the constant struggle between balancing freedom and preserving sovereignty of the state. Additionally, Machiavelli also shares similar conceptions of the realities of political life. He, like Plato, warns that humans cannot self-govern because of their inability to put the state first. He justifies this argument by stating that “in adverse times, when the state has need of citizens, then few of them are to be found” (Machiavelli 1532, 42). Both acknowledge the difficulties of self-government by the people and illustrate the political consequences of relying on the people for the preservation of the state.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Every truly democratic society is subconsciously built on the idea of a social contract. In John Locke’s famous theory, the social contract is a tacit agreement between the populace and its government. Locke proclaims that while the people have the power to grant and revoke ruling control to certain individuals, they must also release some of their rights as the government asserts dominance for the purpose of establishing an orderly society. Although the fundamental structure of a society can be outlined by the social contract, the beliefs of the ruling body are not guaranteed to be benevolent or ethically correct. The importance and ingenuity of the social contract is found in its ability to remind both parties of a nation, the government and its people, of the respective powers they hold.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Some 350 years ago, British philosopher John Locke made the claim that humans have a duty to obey the laws of whatever country one resides in simply because by residing in these countries, each resident has tacitly consented to obeying the laws of their respective country’s laws. The idea of tacit consent is central to Locke’s theory of political obligation because it is the foundation of the relationship between a state and its citizens, and whether there is a natural sense of trust between the government and the body politic. In a Lockean society, a sovereign power is, to a large extent, accountable for its people; however, their power is also restricted by Locke’s law of nature, which states that all men are free “to order their actions

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Locke’s definition of liberty depends on whether the person is in the state of nature, in which people are “without subordination or subjection” (Locke 101) or if they have formed into a commonwealth, or whenever “any number of men are so united into one society, as to quit every one his executive power of the law of nature, and resign it to the public” (Locke 137-38). In the Lockean state of nature, men have a “freedom to order their actions and dispose of their possessions and persons” (Locke 101). This freedom is still limited by what Locke refers to as the law of nature, or that “no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions” (Locke 102). He also defines the liberty of the state of nature as “not to be under any will or legislative authority of man” (Locke 109). In his form of commonwealth, there is more limited freedom, in which liberty is to “be under no legislative power, but that established, by the consent of the commonwealth” (Locke 110).

Read More
1045 Words | 5 Pages

The consent of men creates the general will; therefore, natural rights provide justice and peace for the state. The act of man sacrificing individual rights over the benefit of shared consent presents legitimacy in organizing a civil government. Civil government, to survive, requires man to transfer his rights to the government. The lack of established law and impartial judges, and the authority to punish a violator, are the needs of the state of nature. Men will leave the state of nature to maintain what they possess if those three conditions are not met.

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

The key aspect discussed within this essay, is that the United Kingdom does not have a constitution in a sense of not having a single licit system, and how it has an assembly of aged, incoherent and inconsistent principles. We must first discuss what the term constitution is; whether the United Kingdom has a constitution; the rule of law; what bodies and powers mould the legal system; and arguments whether there should be a reform. The word constitution is explained and illustrated by the Greek philosopher Aristotle (347 BC - 350 BC) who hypothesised that ‘The government is everywhere sovereign in the state, and the constitution is in fact the government’; the form of the constitution is governing the state. In correlation to today’s society a constitution is a set of legal principles which governs a country or state which various institutions have duties to impose. It is either unitary or federal, and is either a codified ‘written’ or uncodified ‘unwritten’ constitution.

Read More
1310 Words | 6 Pages

There have been many discussions over whether or not justice can or does come from neutral principles, which have led to many disputes over the necessity of a state and legitimate justification of one. I aim to explain what kind of neutrality we can achieve, how the state plays into the role of justice, and its legitimacy. More specifically, I will argue that a sort of “artificial” neutrality can be put into place, and that the state is not necessary but the optimal way to uphold justice. First, the concept of neutrality is important to the idea of justice.

Read More
304 Words | 2 Pages

This paper is going to touch upon whether or not the U.S has achieved the democratic principles of individual rights outlined in the constitution. individual rights are protected by the bill of rights and include economic rights related to property , political rights related to bearing arms and maintaining private residences (quizlet.com). For example when people talk about if women should have the right to abort a child. In the beginning of writing the constitution, individual rights did not play a part of the laws that were being made .

Read More
1929 Words | 8 Pages

Because man is free and equal in the state of nature, he must be assured that he will still be so when he enters society, thus for Locke the establishment of the state occurs on the basis of assured equality without which there would be no incentive to enter into society. In support of this severance he says; “I esteem it above all things necessary to distinguish exactly the business of civil government from that of religion and to settle the just bounds that lie between the one and the other” (Locke, Toleration, 2). Every member of the commonwealth, regardless of affiliation, merits equality under the law. In spite of legislation protecting each individual, conflict will inevitably erupt, if not between a government and its people then among the people themselves. In Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, he discusses the progression of man’s thought process; how we develop opinions and ideas, as well as the role religion plays in our general understanding of life.

Read More

More about Tacit Consent In The Declaration Of Independence

Related Topics

Open Document