Take The Jurors, And Just Take His Head Off Out, By Lewis Carroll
In the documentary Making a Murder, Brendan Dassey, nephew of Stephen Avery, gave a testimony that implicated himself and Avery in the murder of Teresa Halback (Demos, Ricciardi, 2015). Among one of the many issues presented within the documentary was the treatment that Dassey received. Dassey had an IQ of 70 and was taking special education classes (Demos, Ricciardi, 2015). Dassey’s IQ was lower than average but almost on the edge of intellectual disability (Dassey v Dittman, 2016, p.5). After giving the confession, he asked if he would be able to get back to class by a certain time to turn in a project (Demos, Ricciardi, 2015).
Characters In the book, Getting Away With Murder by Chris Crowe, there are many important characters but the three main characters are, Emmett Till, Roy Bryant, and J.W. Milam. Emmett Till- Emmett Till is the most important character during the course of this book.
"Don 't judge a book by its cover" is a famous saying that some of us heard it before and some of us experienced it. 12 jurors were experiencing this quote when they gathered to decide whether a young boy is guilty by killing his father or not. Juror 2 stated, "Well, anyway, I think he was guilty" (6). Juror 2 represent most of us, as sometimes we judge from what we hear and not from what we see. The 12 jurors are from various backgrounds and each one has a distinctive personality.
With a jury that cares about everything but the trial, how is the defendant suppose to be given a fair trial? He isn’t. The last piece of evidence is cartoon 3, where a dog is being judged by his natural enemies, feline (Document E). These ‘jurors’ all hate the dog and no matter what the evidence is, the dog will be guilty. It applies to our system with the notion that a suspect is hated by jurors because the media accuses them of being guilty before the trial begins.
This is all stated in Document B of the Jury System Mini-Q “But, you know, if we’d long had trial by Judge in criminal cases and I were now to suggest that his reasoned and professional judgment as to fact and inferences should be replaced by the blanket verdict of pretty well any twelve men and women placed in a cramped box holed up for days or even weeks at a time you would rightly think that I had taken leave of my senses.” This letter is saying that why should we be replacing someone professional at accusing someone and a professional in the judgment of law have his job replaced by twelve untrained people. Another counter is from Document E with the comics. These comics are showing that not everyone is focused on the topic at hand whereas if it were a single judge the case would move a lot smoothly. The comics also state that the jury could just look at the person and accuse him based on his looks and not the evidence that had been presented.
"Let the people see what they did to my boy." Those were the words spoken by Emmett Till's mother, Mamie Till-Mobley, after viewing the brutalized body of her son. In 1955 the murder of 14-year-old Emmett Till brought national attention to racial violence and injustice in Mississippi. This poignant case shocks America.
When they were tried, the biased juries would prosecute them as guilty; innocent or not. Appeals were needed to give them a second chance. Harper Lee comments on this social issue in “To Kill a Mockingbird” when Tom Robinson faces a biased jury. Biased juries and appeals are shown in the Mack Ingram trial as well as the Tom Robinson
The play Twelve Angry Men written by Reginald Rose the jury decides whether or not the boy is guilty of murder in the first degree. Juror Eight votes not guilty because, he needs more evidence. Juror Eight is compassionate, when all the other jurors voted the boy guilty. He tenderhearted proclaims that voting him guilty isn’t easy he implies, “Look this kids been kicked around his all his life.” Juror Eight doesn't want to just send the boy off to prison without further investigation.
Out of all the Greek gods and goddesses, one of the most powerful Greek goddess who had a huge impact in later time periods and western civilization was Athena. Athena was the Greek goddess of wisdom, skill, strategy, civilization, laws, warfare, and inspiration. “The Greek goddess of warfare and wisdom sacred animal was an owl and her sacred plant was the olive tree.” “She doesn’t ever fall in love or have children.” Athena has impacted western civilizations in many ways such as art, architecture, and myths.
8th juror appeals to their sense of pathos and pity by saying “this boy’s been kicked around all his life… He’s had a pretty terrible sixteen years. I think maybe we owe him a few words. That’s all.” While this has nothing to do with the case, he hopes to appeal to their humanity in order to get them to give him a chance in these deliberations.
Imagine getting that one dreaded letter in the mail, calling you to do the one thing you didn’t plan the week before your wedding, JURY DUTY. Reginald Rose wrote the play Twelve Angry Men for a television drama after he sat on a jury. The characters in this play are identified not by names but by numbers. Twelve men are confined to a deliberation room after the trial of a 19-year-old boy accused of stabbing and killing his father. Twelve Angry Men illustrates the many dangers of the jury system like, a biased jury, being left with questions, and feeling inconvenienced by jury duty.
Martin Luther King Jr. was a peaceful person who advocated for equality. In his collections of speeches and writings in I Have a Dream: Writings and Speeches That Changed the World, edited by James Melvin Washington, King shows how he studied non-violence resistance from the teachings of Gandhi. He advocates for equality through peace because he believes it to be more effective than in hateful acts. His speeches and writings urge readers to consider aspects of human experiences that involve equal rights for everyone. Malcolm X was similar to King in them both wanting equality.
‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.
The jury couldn’t possibly be expected to take Tom Robinsons word over the Ewells” (Lee.117). The
BUILDING SHARED VALUES INTRODUCTION The heart of any organisation is its values. That is why it most important to incorporate values into the general operations of any organisation (Parry & Proctor-Thomson, 2002).
More about Take The Jurors, And Just Take His Head Off Out, By Lewis Carroll
Making A Murder By Brendan Dassey
225 Words | 1 PagesGetting Away With Murder By Chris Crowe
810 Words | 4 PagesEthos, Pathos, Pathos And Logos In 12 Angry Men
1964 Words | 8 PagesJudge Dbq Essay
776 Words | 4 PagesJury System Dbq Essay
772 Words | 4 PagesGetting Away With Murder By Chris Crowe
487 Words | 2 PagesBiased Juries In To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee
975 Words | 4 PagesTwelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
474 Words | 2 PagesHow Did Athena Impact Western Civilization
2250 Words | 9 Pages12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesJury Duty In 12 Angry Men
1207 Words | 5 PagesThe Ballot Or The Bullet By Malcolm X
446 Words | 2 Pages12 Angry Men Analysis
814 Words | 4 PagesTom Robinson Discrimination Quotes
1386 Words | 6 PagesBuilding Shared Value Case Study
1146 Words | 5 Pages