ipl-logo

Taking A Look At The Monsanto Company

477 Words2 Pages

“Social responsibility is grounded in effective and mutually beneficial relationships with customer, employees, investors, competitors, government, and the community, and others who have a stake in the company”(Ferrell, Thorne, & Ferrell, 2016, pg. 30). When interacting with stakeholders it can affect the organization’s action as well as their policies and vice versa. Monsanto most important stakeholder groups are stockholders and customers. The company’s primary customers are farmers. “Farmers are the heart and soul of our company. Our mission is to discover and develop innovative new products to help you achieve better harvests in a more environmentally sustainable way (Monsanto, 2017). Monsanto listens to their customer's concerns and …show more content…

Montano advised their customers that they are committed to supporting them. Although, Monsanto appears to be thankful and appreciative of their customers they are no friend to the family farmer, or communities they live in. Monsanto has caused the family farmer to grow big with them or has pushed them out of business. “Every day Monsanto employees dedicate their time and talents to impact the lives of our ever-growing global population. Our employees are empowered by collaboration, challenging work, and their contributions are both valued and rewarded”(Monsanto, 2017). Monsanto Company has great rewards and benefits which is important in any organization. In addition, good benefits, and rewards are key factors in attracting employees and also keeping them once their hired. “Monsanto provides employees with a complete package of total rewards, which go beyond competitive pay to include: support for employees’ health and financial security, opportunities to grow, recognition for employees’ contributions, and a great working environment. Investors are in it to merely make more money why else would they invest. Monsanto 12 investors are almost the same top 12 investors of Facebook. This gives Monsanto an advantage over competitors also gives them a better opportunity to connect with individuals on a personal

Show More
Related
357 Words | 2 Pages

In 2008 “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” was published in Vanity Fair. Penned by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele, this exposition presents acts by Monsanto that may be considered questionable. Acts such as possessing a “shadowy army of private investigators” and the production of “two of the most toxic substances ever known”. The company was established in 1901 as Monsanto Chemical Works.

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

In the article entitled Monsanto's Harvest of Fear, Donald L. Barley and James B. Steele demonstrate that Monsanto already dominates the United States food chain with their genetically modified seeds. They are currently targeting milk production which is just as scary as the corporation's legal battles against the small farmers. This situation leads to a history of toxic infections or diseases. There were many disagreements between Gary Rinehart and a stranger about the innovative seeds. They were under surveillance and an investigator came in the picture.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

Monsanto is that it shouldn’t matter if someone uses a product that THEY bought with their own money for other uses. If someone has to agree to the terms of something then they should have the right to do whatever they please because as the Court stated in its ruling, the product will keep its value. Overall, My opinion is that nobody should be done wrong just because their doing something goes against a “Terms of Agreement” which doesn’t seem like a real crime. In the end, Vernon Hugh Bowman won the case all due to Bowman’s one-time purchase of Monsanto’s product which allowed him to take advantage of their patent products over seasons without having to respect the rights of a patent

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

The three essays assigned this week had several common threads running through them. The strongest core theme is the rapid change in the food cycle in America and the vast changes that have taken place in the way by which we grow, produce, and process the food that average Americans eat. The food we eat now is drastically different from what our grandparents grew up eating and the three essays each examine that in a different way. Another theme is the loss of knowledge by the average consumer about where their food comes from, what it is composed of, and what, if any, danger it might pose to them. “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele is a harsh look at the realities of food production in a country where large corporations, like Monsanto, have been allowed to exploit laws and loopholes to bend farmers and consumers to their

Read More
194 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t agree with the court 's decision about the Monsanto vs. Percy Schmeiser case because of many reasons. First, I think It 's morally wrong to sue somebody for a crop that is not theirs just for patenting. Second, the Monsanto vs. Schmeiser case is an issue of intellectual property rights versus physical property rights. Whether patent rights take priority over the right of the owner of physical property to use his property, to what length can a patent put restrictions on the physical owner of the property as to what they may do with this property, including duplicating or producing it in any way without permission of the patent holder. According to the Center of Food Safety, as of 2005, 186 farmers had paid Monsanto a total of $15

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

Pro farmer/anti GMO debate outline GMOs are now a widespread thing and can be seen on every shelf of the supermarket, but does anyone stop to consider how this is affecting the farmers involved? Farmers are suffering due to GMO growth and companies such as Monsanto, and it’s time that they pay. Companies like Monsanto aren’t playing fairly when it comes to the farmers they work most closely with. For instance, they essentially force the farmers to perpetually pay for every season of farming. Monsanto sues if you reuse their seeds, which forces GMO growing farmers to pay time and time again.

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

New regulations, an enforced code of ethics and striving to be more socially responsible has led Monsanto to enhance their relationships with stakeholders. Monsanto wrote a pledge to inform all of their

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

Monsanto's CEO Hugh Grant went on "CBS This Morning" earlier today to discuss all the concerns people have about the corporations practices and products. This article will discuss all the talking points of that interview and his responses. The first talking point was the Safety of GMO crops, to which Grant used the standard Monsanto misinformation for is answer: GMOs are one of the most studied product in the world. The reason I categorize this as misinformation instead of disinformation is because it is not an outright lie; there are indeed a lot of studies on GMOs, the majority showing GMOs are safe.

Read More
228 Words | 1 Pages

One of the first steps in balancing the conflict among the variety of stakeholder is that Monsanto would need to work in conjunction with their stakeholders to provide technological innovations and to get rid of fears in regards of its industry. The company has been working to innovate their products and strategies to have some competitive edge. Stakeholders focus their attention mostly on profits. However, to balances their interests, Monsanto has to satisfy their consumers so that they can purchase their product. Nevertheless, this case has shown that Monsanto has had to face several obstacles to maximize their profit and to motivate their consumers to be loyal to the company this includes their moral obligations and social responsibility

Read More
292 Words | 2 Pages

These farmers had been bullied into using Monsanto’s products like the infamous terminator seeds which would grow crops that would become sterile after the first harvest. There’ve also been cases where farmers were discovered to have Monsanto crops “mysteriously” turn up in their harvest and where then sued by the company for their supposed theft. Outside of America they were linked to a number of controversies in India such as the subminimum payment of laborer wages, usage of child labor, and mass farmer suicides in India after their GMO cotton seeds failed to grow anything and they were left in deep debt to Monsanto.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

1. If you were Monsanto’s CEO, how would you best balance the conflicting needs of the variety of stakeholder groups that Monsanto must successfully engage? Monsanto has improved in terms of its corporate responsibility; however it does not maintain the most ethical culture possible. Monsanto is in a difficult position, as it produces products that many people do not understand or trust. The corporation also does much business in very poor countries where it is very easy for critics to accuse Monsanto of taking advantage of people who do not know any better.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Fairfield-Sonn indicates that while sixty countries require labeling of GMOs, major seed producers Monsanto and DuPont of the United States opposed legislation requiring the labeling of GMOs, to the tune of twelve million dollars (66). Millions of labels indicating the presence of GMOs in foods could be produced in place of the millions spent in opposition. This opposition implies guilt, or, as Krimsky implied, political motivation on the part of billion dollar companies like Monsanto and DuPont. Not all food distributors oppose the movement to label GMOs, but rather produce their own organic foods and label them voluntarily. Based on the USDA’s requirements for organic foods, the Kroger Company introduced the Simple Truth line, while the Aldi Company presented their Simple Nature brand, with industry experts expecting future expansion of the organic market “due to the absence of mandatory GMO labeling” (Bain and Dendachi 9466).

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

One may analyze a company’s actions based on their consequences. This is an ethical approach championed by 19th century philosopher John Stuart Mill referred to as utilitarianism. Under utilitarianism, an individual or organization should “choose the alternative that is likely to produce the greatest overall good” (Halbert and Ingulli, 1). Through this moral paradigm, one sees that many of Monsanto’s actions fail to achieve the greatest overall good. One reason for this failure is the market failure of negative externalities.

Read More
1537 Words | 7 Pages

Monsanto is a very confusing company because of its conflicting views. The group that is strongly against Monsanto consists mostly of farmers. The farmer group against Monsanto is very strong and the Vice article matches with the investigative journalists analysis of Monsanto being the bully. When read about for the first time, the reader can’t help but feel emotion for the farmers and the use of ethos evokes the human action of helping those in need. Because Monsanto has also been in the news fairly often, the term “Monsanto” is familiar to most, if not all individuals.

Read More
95 Words | 1 Pages

I will say that it 's about time countries took a firm stand against Monsanto and just deny them the opportunity to exploit

Read More

More about Taking A Look At The Monsanto Company

Related Topics

Open Document