Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversy against gmos
Controversy over genetically modified food
Gmo bioethical issues
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 2008 “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” was published in Vanity Fair. Penned by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele, this exposition presents acts by Monsanto that may be considered questionable. Acts such as possessing a “shadowy army of private investigators” and the production of “two of the most toxic substances ever known”. The company was established in 1901 as Monsanto Chemical Works.
The “Farmer” commercial appealed to me because I have conservative morals and values. When I watched the commercial I thought about the sacrifice a farmer experiences everyday. I am thankful for the long, hard hours a farmer works. I thought about how the farmer doesn’t get vacations or days off like I do. Our farmers take care of the livestock by feeding and milking them.
The three essays assigned this week had several common threads running through them. The strongest core theme is the rapid change in the food cycle in America and the vast changes that have taken place in the way by which we grow, produce, and process the food that average Americans eat. The food we eat now is drastically different from what our grandparents grew up eating and the three essays each examine that in a different way. Another theme is the loss of knowledge by the average consumer about where their food comes from, what it is composed of, and what, if any, danger it might pose to them. “Monsanto’s Harvest of Fear” by Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele is a harsh look at the realities of food production in a country where large corporations, like Monsanto, have been allowed to exploit laws and loopholes to bend farmers and consumers to their
Sam Roberts in the article “A Decade of Fear” argues that McCarthyism turned Americans against each other. Robert supports his claim by illustrating fear, describing betrayal, and comparing it to other U.S. internal conflicts. The author’s purpose is to point out a vulnerable period in American history in order to demonstrate that Americans felt prey McCarthy’s negative propaganda. The author writes in a cynical tone for an educated audience. I strongly agree with Robert’s claim.
Scott Deeter was the president and CEO of Ventria Bioscience, a Sacramento, California-based biotechnology firm that developed an innovative process to produce pharmaceutical proteins in the seeds of genetically modified rice, which was used to create a medicine to lessen the severity of childhood diarrhea. However, Scott Deeter and Ventria faced many problems. One being that the company was unsuccesful in getting the California Secretary if Agriculture to grant them the necessary permits in order to plant the 120 acres of bioengineered rice to begin commercial-scale production. Another being that many different organizations opposed what they were doing, such as, environmentalists, food safety activists, consumer advocates, and rice farmers. There is also a risk of contamination, and genetically altered plant possibly cross-breeding with wild plants.
This campaign was created by The Richards Group back in 1995 as three-dimensional billboard with the intentions to do big things with a small budget. This first billboard concept was adapted as an integrated campaign that is now recognized as an example of a prosperous marketing campaign. This campaign has grown to be one of the industry’s most respected campaigns that have won Chick-fil-A prestigious awards. Since the campaign was introduced, the sales have increased from a little over $500 million in 1995 to an impressive increase of $5 billion in 2013.
Personally, I believe the “seed police” is simply a distraction to the immorality instances committed by Monsanto. I visualize the “seed police,” like this: a police car pulling 2 cars over at once because they both were traveling above the speed limit. By Monsanto being accused of immoral acts, harming the environment, and causing unknown harm to the human body they carry a load of practicing negative ethics. The fact they would hold farmers accountable for mirroring their practices is like the pot calling the teakettle black. It seems to be more about a dollar then actually spreading advantages of genetically modifying seeds.
Monsanto is an American multi-national agrochemical and agricultural biotechnological corporation founded in 1901. Their main headquarters is located in Creve Coeur in St. Louis, Missouri and they are the leading producer in the world of genetically engineered seed and plant breeding. There are many other producers of these types of genetically engineered products whose names include: DuPont (US), Syngenta (CH), Groupe Limagrain (FR), Land O’ Lakes (US), Bayer Crop Science (DE), Sakata (JP), DLF-Trifolium (DK), Takii (JP). Monsanto is also known for being the manufacturer of the herbicide Roundup® and many of their genetically modified seeds are pre-treated with this herbicide.
“For more than four decades, Canadian farmer Percy Schmeiser cultivated and harvested “oilseed rape” (Goldsmith). Normally, he planted one year’s product obtained by “seeds” he used and preserved via the bounty of the year before (Goldsmith).” “Global giant Monsanto sued Schmeiser in 1998 when its detectives discovered some of its GM oilseed rape amongst Schmeiser’s crop (Goldsmith). “Monsanto accused Schmeiser of moving in on its copyright on the seed, and also went so far as to insinuate “that” Schmeiser had procured the “seed” by illegal means, i.e. stealing it (Goldsmith).” “Later, Monsanto declared “that” even if Schmeiser had retrieved the seeds legally, it was irrelevant (Goldsmith).”
Sam Roberts in the article, A Decade of Fear, argues that Americans turned against each other because of McCarthyism. Roberts supports his claim by explaining, contrasting, and demonstrating. The author’s purpose is to persuade the audience in order to assure Americans that McCarthyism was extremely impactful. The author writes in a speculative tone. I strongly agree with Roberts claim.
New regulations, an enforced code of ethics and striving to be more socially responsible has led Monsanto to enhance their relationships with stakeholders. Monsanto wrote a pledge to inform all of their
A corporatist markets off what they know would put them in financial ruin if people found out the truth behind what they claim is bettering the world. Once gathering enough positive claims, they proceed anyway. This is the quintessence of GMO marketing. Now, as the newest generation, millennials are likely to have been fed these genetically modified foods growing up, but have the technology to research and make their own intelligent and informed decision on whether these foods should be continued to be produced and distributed throughout the world. It is not being overly suspicious to not believe a corporation such as Monsanto, the leading agrochemical company, when with minimal research they publicize that GMOs are safe to consume.
A corporation is a group of people authorizes to act like a single individual. There’re many corporations around the world, such as Nike Inc., McDonalds, Nestle, IBM etc., but Monsanto has triggered a lot of red flags among customers. Monsanto have been around since 1901 and is an agricultural biotechnology and multinational agrochemical corporation. This corporation has gain notoriety around the world with their genetically modified seed, cow hormones experiments, human stem cells and even patent human breast milk (collaboration with Nestle). All these experiment or “technological advances” often distress people in that line of work; in this case farmers are the one getting attacked.
This film about the controversy of large corporations presented many instances of unethical behavior being conducted by big business. One strong argument given in the film was the early use of the 14th amendment by corporations to classify themselves as people. This bill was originally added to give rights to African-American slaves, but the majority of Supreme Court appeals were from companies demanding individual rights. This was the beginning of private and protected business in America that evolved into privately-owned America of today. Another well supported example was the case of the dangerous hormone Posilac, created by the large chemical corporation Monsanto.
Corn has risen 259 percent. And the price of genetically modified cotton has jumped a stunning 516 percent” (www.miaminewtimes.com) since 1996. Moreover, Monsanto alone owns 90% of the corn and 85% of the soybeans