ipl-logo

President And CEO Of Ventria Bioscience

760 Words4 Pages

Scott Deeter was the president and CEO of Ventria Bioscience, a Sacramento, California-based biotechnology firm that developed an innovative process to produce pharmaceutical proteins in the seeds of genetically modified rice, which was used to create a medicine to lessen the severity of childhood diarrhea. However, Scott Deeter and Ventria faced many problems.One being that the company was unsuccesful in getting the California Secretary if Agriculture to grant them the necessary permits in order to plant the 120 acres of bioengineered rice to begin commercial-scale production. Another being that many different organizations opposed what they were doing, such as, environmentalists, food safety activists, consumer advocates, and rice farmers. There is also a risk of contamination, and genetically altered plant possibly cross-breeding with wild plants.

2.) What groups have a stake in Ventria’s actions? Identify the relevant stakeholders and for each, state its interests and sources of power.

Scott Deeter, the President and CEO of Ventria Bioscience was a stakeholder, along with Dr. Raymond Rodriguez, the founder of Ventria Bioscience, and a molecular biologist on the faculty of the University of California-Davis. In his search for funding, Rodriguez approached Dr. …show more content…

Without doing this, they have no room to grow. With no effort to reach out to the community, how will they market themselves? If they don’t persuade government agencies then they won’t have regulations to proceed with their business. I do not believe that would benefit Ventria in any way. If dialogue and political action are unsuccessful, they should then figure out a way to make the opposers (environmentalists, food safety activists, consumer advocates, and rice farmers) benefit in some way, especially by following all of the regulations. I think that would definitely help their

Show More
Related
319 Words | 2 Pages

The major adversaries of Ventria Bioscience are the Japanese rice consumers, the rice producers of California, and the California Rice Commission (CRC). The Japanese rice consumers have a large impact on the opposition of Ventria Bioscience because of their negative reaction towards genetically modified rice. Their viewpoints on this subject are expressed by the Japanese Rice Retailers Association, who represent their concerns and threatened to influence the Japanese government to stop importing California rice if it is commercialized in the United States. The Japanese rice consumers pose a major threat because the Japanese Government 's potential halt of importing California rice will damage the California rice industry, the California rice

Read More
225 Words | 1 Pages

In the article entitled Monsanto's Harvest of Fear, Donald L. Barley and James B. Steele demonstrate that Monsanto already dominates the United States food chain with their genetically modified seeds. They are currently targeting milk production which is just as scary as the corporation's legal battles against the small farmers. This situation leads to a history of toxic infections or diseases. There were many disagreements between Gary Rinehart and a stranger about the innovative seeds. They were under surveillance and an investigator came in the picture.

Read More
1785 Words | 8 Pages

The essay “Best Hope Lies in Privately Funded Stem Cell Research”, states the importance of stem cell research and the effects it can have on curing disease more effectively than any other method. Written by Sigrid Fry-Revere, PhD, director of bioethics studies at the Cato Institute; the author of the paper emphasizes the importance of funding programs for stem cell research on highlights the government holding out on funding due to ethical reasons. Revere claims that the government is threatening the private investing of stem cell research organizations and are trying to put a stop to production of research. This essay is targeted for people who are academic/bioethics orientated and the future of the world disease control and abolishment.

Read More
638 Words | 3 Pages

An Analysis of Bill Nye’s Episode on Genetically Modified Foods In the episode of his show “The Eyes of Nye” entitled Genetically Modified Foods, William “Bill” Nye presents scientific evidence surrounding the debate on genetically modified foods. He emphasizes that we should farm responsibly, which he believes should involve making decisions on the modification of each food on a case-wise basis. In summary, his view is that we need greater transparency in the farm-to-table process. In order to understand his conclusion, it is necessary to critically evaluate the arguments and examine the validity of each argument.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Becoming a Beckman Scholar, there is such a unique opportunity to use our platform to support a wide variety of causes and initiatives. By leveraging our networks and resources, we can make a lasting impact on our communities and the world at large. I am driven to use this scholarship to further my education and research in the field of biotechnology. With the help of this scholarship, I hope to develop innovative solutions that will have a positive impact on the

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

“Today in the United States, by the simple acts of feeding ourselves, we are unwittingly participating in the largest experiment ever conducted on human beings.” Jeremy Seifert certainly knows how to get viewers’ attention, as exemplified by the film blurb describing his 2013 documentary, GMO OMG. The frightening depiction of the food industry is one of many efforts to expose consumers of the twenty-first century to the powerful organizations that profit from national ignorance and lack of critical inquiry and involvement. Seifert effectively harnesses the elements of rhetoric throughout his phenomenal argument against remaining complacent about the food industry’s act of withholding of information about genetically modified organisms from

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

More risky strategies such as violence, litigation, and the disturbance of social order may also be used to dramatize the group’s cause and demonstrate that is willing to pay a high cost for the achievement of its objectives. Regardless of all the other tactics available, lobbying is still the essential tool utilized by interest groups in democratic process to get the government on side with the group in its policy choices. The center of this action relies on the institutional arrangements of individual political frameworks, but the object of the activity is always to secure ideal policy decisions or the appointment of particular people to positions of power who are seen as supporters of the group’s cause. This lobbying is done by delegates of the group through their dealings with government authorities. This fundamental routine of associating with government leaders to further the interest of the groups is just as old as contemporary groups themselves.

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

Genetically modified foods could produce new toxic substances, and/or allergens. A gene was inserted into the DNA of a soybean plant to increase the nutritional value of the soybean. However, this particular gene in the genetically modified soybean also produced an allergen. Fortunately, the plant was not put into production.

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

Genetically modified crops also aim to lower the failure of crops, which can maximize the benefits of farmer through the increase of income from selling crops. Nevertheless, this technology created chances for biotech companies to exploit farmers, even causing farmers to commit suicide. Big companies developed the genetically modified seed, and sell it to farmers. But farmers have little bargaining power only, they can only rely on the biotech companies. These companies do not aim to help farmers to increase their income, but aim to maximize their own profit.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

1. If you were Monsanto’s CEO, how would you best balance the conflicting needs of the variety of stakeholder groups that Monsanto must successfully engage? Monsanto has improved in terms of its corporate responsibility; however it does not maintain the most ethical culture possible. Monsanto is in a difficult position, as it produces products that many people do not understand or trust. The corporation also does much business in very poor countries where it is very easy for critics to accuse Monsanto of taking advantage of people who do not know any better.

Read More
792 Words | 4 Pages

Once appraised by Silicon Valley Press tech, Theranos, a biotechnology company, is losing its name value as days go by. Elizabeth Holmes, founder and Chief Executive Officer of Theranos, was known for her unique story of how Theranos has started. Upon start of the company, Holmes claimed that the Theranos’ technology is new, but different from what is out in the market. New and innovative, this company’s propaganda attracted many people’s attentions. From the start, Holmes’ plan was to provide higher accuracy tests, multiple tests from a drop of blood, and, in bigger picture, more access to its technology to the public.

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

For years, the health and safety of genetically modified foods have been debated and researched by scientists, but the question still stands: should genetically modified foods be allowed for consumption? The process of genetic modification involves inserting a gene from bacteria or a virus into an organism where it would normally not be found. The purpose is to alter the genetic code in plants and animals to make them more productive or resistant to pests or farming techniques. Genetically modified organisms, more commonly known as GMOs, have been a controversial topic of debate for a number of reasons. The ethics behind genetically modified foods come into question due to an abundance of short and long-term effects from the process, many of which are still unknown today.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

It’s a popular topic on the media that GMOs are bad for the human body. Well, little did the they know that ninety percent of corn grown in the US is genetically modified (Margie Kelly), and the body can 't even distinguish between GMOs and non-GMOs! There are people debating that GMOs are unhealthy, bad for the economy and even the environment. These people must be uneducated on this topic. Genetically modified crops improve our society because they allow farmers to yield a larger crop, improve the quality their crop, and lessen the negative environmental impacts of their crops.

Read More
1888 Words | 8 Pages

In the “Biopharm- Seltek Negotiation”, we played the role of the buyer – Biopharm, a profitable U.S.- based pharmaceutical company. In order to produce a genetically engineered antibiotic compound – Detox - a very promising pharmaceutical product, Biopharm needed a plant with special manufacturing equipment. There were two appropriate options for this decision making process: (i) Building a new plant or (ii) Buying an

Read More
765 Words | 4 Pages

Eric Schlosser interviews farmers that grow their produce naturally and farmers that genetically enhance their products. The reason for this is because there is money involved, if for example it normally takes five months to grow produce, the farmers don’t get the money until it is grown. Although genetically enhanced produced that grows in three months makes the farmer get money two months quicker. I feel empathy to the farmers that grow their produce organically because they know that genetically enhanced products have an effect on the human body. I also feel sorry for them because they feel pressured or almost forced to use genetically enhanced produce to at least keep their house and

Read More

More about President And CEO Of Ventria Bioscience

Related Topics

Open Document