ipl-logo

Tarasoff Case Summary

511 Words3 Pages

A fine line between therapeutic care and safety of the public is examined in the Tarasoff Case Study. In this case study, a man named Prosenjit Poddar killed a woman named Tatiana Tarasoff after he stated his intent of murder to his therapist. The therapist decided not to disclose this information to Tatiana or her family. He had Prosenjit detained by the police until he appeared to be talking rational when he was released. Prosenjit then persuaded Tatiana’s brother to share an apartment together in order to get closer to Tatiana. When Tatiana returned from a trip, he killed her (Beauchamp & Childress, 2001).
The primary ethical question that was raised during the case study was if the therapist should share information about Prosenjit’s intent …show more content…

The article argues that the therapist has a legal duty to the safety of this patient and the patient’s would-be victim (Beauchamp & Childress, 2001). If the therapist disclosed this information to the family, Tatiana likely would have lived.
The other side of the argument is that the therapist should keep confidentiality of the conversation. First, without the use of confidentiality in a therapy session, a patient may choice to avoid therapy. Second, confidentiality is essential for full disclosure and effective treatment. Third, keeping information confidential is essential for the client to maintain his trust with the therapist (Beauchamp & Childress, 2001).
One of the main guiding principles of Islam is the preservation of life (Gatrad & Sheikh, 2001). Someone that believes in Islam might not take the side of the therapist. Their focus is to maintain life, so if Prosenjit’s confidentiality has to be broken to do this, so be it. In Christianity, murder is viewed as a sin under the ten commandments. If the therapist chooses not to share the information about the murder plot to authorities, he essentially is causing her Tatiana to die. However, lying is also a sin in Christianity. This is why the therapist must explain to his patient that anything said here is confidential unless you state intent of harm to yourself or

Show More
Related

Case Citation: Gallagher V. Cayuga Medical Center

1153 Words | 5 Pages

The decedent was later released from the hospital after being cleared by the psychiatrist for discharge and later committed suicide by shooting himself in the head. The Respondent, Cayuga Medical Center, is where multiple physicians; Christopher Scianna and Drew Koch, a registered nurse; Meghan Beeby, and an on-duty psychiatrist; Auguste Duplan, had evaluated the decedent’s health and mental

Read More

What Is Ariel Tritondatter Case

153 Words | 1 Pages

On November 19, 1898, Ariel Tritondatter was arrested on the felony charges of first- degree murder and breaking & entering. An arraignment was later held on November 22, 1898, which Ariel Tritondatter was informed about the charges she was faced with. Additionally, Ariel Tritondatter soon entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity Ariel Tritondatter’s criminal trial was set in the Circuit Court with both a jury and a judge called “Syed Ahmed Khan”. The defendant, Ariel Tritondatter, almost didn’t converse throughout the trial, but soon she took a stand to defend herself.

Read More

Psy 270 Week 3

515 Words | 3 Pages

The clients’ files cannot be in an exposed to the public place. The clients’ files should be saved or put in a safe place where only people with authorization have access to. Because the therapist is not aware that Merry accessed the client’s file, the therapist should talk to the receptionist about leaving unattended the client’s files, and explain to the receptionist the ethical issues regarding confidentiality. If the therapist becomes aware that Merry looked at the client’s file, the therapist should explain to Merry the importance of confidentiality. The therapist should also let the client know that his/her information was accessed by

Read More

How Has Vince Li's Forever Fundamentally Changed Mental Health Discussions In Canada?

2128 Words | 9 Pages

The case, regarding Vince Li, forever fundamentally changed mental health discussions in Canada. Vince Li, a mentally ill person experienced a psychotic episode. Li brutally murdered an innocent man and was deemed NCR. Recently, Li has been placed under consideration for more freedoms. This paper will discuss how the media responded, if Li should be released, and why Li differs from a normal criminal.

Read More

How Is Andrei Chikatilo A Serial Killer

2988 Words | 12 Pages

Laine Waters Writing 101 Dr. Mary Lou Gammon Research Paper Andrei Chikatilo: Serial Killer Should a person who has a clear mental or emotional instability, whether it was in the past or present, be punished for their wrong actions? Meaning should someone who has obviously something psychology wrong be punished for any wrong actions including; murder, rape, and other heinous crimes. Andrei Chikatilo was born in the village of Yabluchne in the Sumy Oblast of the Ukraine SSR on October 16th 1936.(Newton. 41.)

Read More

Competency Restoration Case Study

1019 Words | 5 Pages

The legal guideline aims to remind psychologists about their primary obligations as well as rational “precautions to respect the confidentiality rights of those with whom they work or consult, recognizing that confidentiality may be established by law, institutional rules, or professional or scientific relationships.” Maintaining privacy and confidentiality of the defendant facilitate their openness assisting them to recall and relate “pertinent facts and events, including his motives and actions at the time of the offense, and be able to testify in his behalf and to challenge prosecution witnesses.”

Read More

Richard Davis Case Study

1229 Words | 5 Pages

In August 2008, Richard Davis, of Independence, Missouri, was convicted in the kidnapping, rape, and torture of Michelle Huff-Ricci and the kidnapping, rape, and first-degree murder of Marsha Spicer (Rice, 2012). One might be quick to assume that Davis is deranged and that no further explanation can be given. However, Sigmund Freud’s Psychopathy Theory may provide an explanation, though not an excuse, for Davis’s actions.

Read More

Jessie Batcher Case

768 Words | 4 Pages

One of the major ethical implications in serving justice for someone who is claiming a mental illness is balancing the severity of the illness with that of the crime. Mainly to also prevent the perception that these murders would not be impugned. However, it should be considered that physicians at the Veterans Administration Hospital did not offer the PTSD care the patient deemed necessary. Nonmaleficence is at the core of a doctor’s actions, however, in this case not treating resulted in more harm to the patient and others.

Read More

Mr Hidano Case Study Psychology

981 Words | 4 Pages

Hidano was also seen in action as “Family members caught him killing and torturing the neighbors dog” (Assessment, P1). With his perfect score on the psychopath checklist and his actions proves the lengths that Hidano is willing to resort to in order to prove his point in a situation. Prior to the results, the high risk of behavior problems can conclude to the response of no emotion to Kurose’s death. During the argument between

Read More

Paul Bernardo And The Scarborough Rapist

2067 Words | 9 Pages

Throughout the centuries, many people have been diagnosed with the title “Psychopath.” A psychopath is someone who has a mental disorder that causes them to act violently towards people in society and is unable to show sympathy or remorse after what they have done. Canada has had many notorious psychopaths over the years, but there is always one that must outshine the rest; so to speak. Paul Bernardo was not only a psychopath, but he was also named “Canada’s notorious Serial Killer and Rapist” or better known as “The Scarborough Rapist.” This essay will examine Paul Bernardo’s case from beginning to end, and also prove why he is properly labeled as a psychopath.

Read More

CNN Rates On Serial Murder Compared To Those Of The FBI

537 Words | 3 Pages

The film “Murder by Number” also includes medical issues, including brain damage, as contributing to the violence of many serial killers. Some criminologists and psychiatrists believe that serial killers kill because of issues with their families. These issues include failure to properly bond with

Read More

Forensic Ethical Standards

254 Words | 2 Pages

There are ethical standards that a forensic mental health professional must follow they include competence, responsibility, confidentiality and privacy, welfare and respect for the rights of the client and their dignity, and assessment techniques & therapy (National Association of Forensic Counselors, n.d.). Since I have a background in marriage and family therapy in addition to forensic mental health I am skilled in relational and interpersonal assessment, am sensitive to the misuse and abuse of assessment results, promote well-being, and am able to clarify the differences between risk assessing and counseling (Hendricks, Bradley, Southern, Oliver, & Birdsall , 2011). For example, using assessment procedures to promote the best interest

Read More

You Don T Know Jack Movie Analysis

1497 Words | 6 Pages

The main ethical content of this film “You Don’t Know Jack” revolves around this argument. It is about mercy killing which can be supported on the basis that it puts an end to the suffering of terminally ill patient whose cure is certainly not possible. And it can be further backed by argument that a dead patient’s organs can give a new lease of life to many patients who can be cured. In this movie pathologist named Dr. Jack Kevorkian launches his work of death counseling activities to the terminally ill patients. He earns the support of Hemlock society.

Read More

Confidentiality In Nursing Essay

2128 Words | 9 Pages

Ethics Assignment Introduction Confidentiality is an ethical value that remains deeply rooted in the nursing profession and has always been the cornerstone of the nurse-patient relationship. Since the days as nursing students, we were constantly reminded of the significance in maintaining patient’s confidentiality. The Oxford dictionary defines confidentiality as intended to be kept secret while the Cambridge dictionary defines it as the state of being secret.

Read More

Importance Of Confidentiality In Counselling

1090 Words | 5 Pages

They do this by receiving informed and signed consent from themselves and the client. Within this consent, will be the aim of not sharing information with any person and moreover, the client and the counsellor to contain a formal understanding of one another. Confidentiality undermines the public trust of the profession. As when professionals conduct confidentiality, they are demonstrating the virtues of integrity, trust and respect towards the

Read More

More about Tarasoff Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document