ipl-logo

Tardif Vs Wiebe Case Summary

678 Words3 Pages

Throughout the case of Tardif vs Wiebe the concepts of liability are explored. Both in which situation it arises and the consequence that go along with it when a business is held responsible. The case study provides an excellent example of liability.

Vicarious liability is explained as when an “employer is liable for the injuries caused by employees during their employment” (Yates, R.A., 2016). This idea brings the question of whether the liability businesses are held to is too much. In my opinion I think the approach vicarious liability takes is fair and reasonable. An employer is responsible for insuring employees know the roles of their jobs and how to conduct themselves accordingly. If an indecent happens with the employees involving other employees or customers, …show more content…

I believe a business should be held responsible for employee’s improper actions when they have not been given the information to know it was wrong, such as in the Tardif vs Wiebe case. As the case makes it clear Wiebe was not an experienced bouncer nor was he informed of the parameters of the job and what the expectations of proper conduct were (Tardif v Wiebe, 1996, pg 4). Even though it was Poburn, a friend of the defendant Wiebe, who hired him (Tardif v Wiebe, 1996, pg.4), it was still the hotels duty to make sure that Wiebe was given these proper instructions of conduct. If an employee is responsible for wrongful actions after he has already been told of what is acceptable and knows the severity of the consequence these actions will lead to, it is not the businesses job to be held liable. The business has already taken the right steps to inform the employee and cannot do anymore to ensure they follow the instructions. While I believe the amount of liability vicarious liability holds a business to is reasonable, I do not believe that the employer is always at fault for their employee’s actions and should be held

Show More
Related
490 Words | 2 Pages

A player on a Rugby team had extended his arm during a tackle which caused the opponent to break his jaw. The judge ruled that the club is responsible due to vicarious liability in having players carry out actions on demand of the club. The player’s action was revealed to be part of a strategy to get rid of one of the three players on the opposing team that would make the game difficult for them to win. This case is different in ruling due to the fact that the players are under a payed contract as an employee to play the

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been reasonable essential accommodation on the defendant. In this case, the observing the material facts in the light most positive to the Turner, It is difficult to determine the matter of the law based on the evidence that appellant directly intimidate to its employees or place an undue hardship on the defendant, Therefore, the question whether plaintiff’s can perform the important function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an undefended material fact for the trial. Hershey will have a chance at trial to reverse Turner ’s claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make in danger the health safety of its employees as a result, an employer is not wanted to provide accommodations to an employee.

Read More
2294 Words | 10 Pages

This case deals with risk management at an ultimate level. It definitely displays the importance of risk management and how it should be handled. Why is risk management important? One may ask such a silly question, but it needs to be addressed so that an organization can survive and prosper. We can think of risk management and best employment practices coming down to Human Resource (HR) professionals, but the management team must also take part in striving to abide by all the laws.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been essential accommodation on defendant. In this case the looking the material facts in the light most favorable to the Turner, it is difficult to conclude the material of the law, based on the evidence that Turners directly threaten to its employees or place an “Undue hardship” on Hershey. Therefore, the question whether Turners can perform the essential function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an open material fact for trial. Hershey will have a opportunities at trial to defeat Turners claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make vulnerable the health safety of its employees therefore an employer is not requires to accommodate an employee. Moreover, it would carry out an undue hardship that even with the accommodation.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Even though working conditions are the responsibility of the employer, it is the job of the employee to practice and implement safe working practices. In order to determine if the company is responsible, a complete report including the employee’s actions should be considered. The incident could just be an outcome of employees not practicing safe working procedures. Whether the penalties are sufficient, that would depend on the outcome of a complete investigation of the

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

Both Herbert’s supervisor and the company’s president should be held vicariously liable for Missy’s death. However, to answer why they would be liable the term vicarious liability must be defined for understanding. This form of liability is defined as “liability or accountability of one person for the act of another” (Chamelin & Thomas, 2012, p. 49). In this case, it is the lack of employer negligence and negligent supervision that would cause for both the supervisor and company president to be liable for this young girl’s death.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire was an influential event in American history that caused workers and business owners all of the country to revisit their work-related regulations. Many dangers that occurred as a result of the factory owners’ actions caused the tragedy to be more harmful than necessary. Other preventable mistakes made by the firemen and their equipment added to the tragic nature of this event. America has learned that factories and businesses need safer rules and work environments to protect their employees. Because of this tragic event in the nation’s history, the government passed an abundance of laws to support the safety of workers and their work conditions.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

Individuals who were working in the asbestos mine didn’t like that Banton was taking this to court as they could have lost their jobs if Banton’s case was successful, and the asbestos mine shut down. Whereas many individuals who were on Banton’s side and who were affected by James Hardie believed that all people who have been injured because of someone’s carelessness, should be rewarded with compensation from the negligent person. And those people also believed that making a company liable also helps to guarantee that they are more careful in their actions that could possibly hurt another person. After Banton was diagnosed in 1999 for asbestosis, he instantly knew that this disease was linked to when he was working as a lathe operator at James Hardie. Banton sued James Hardie, and received 800,000 dollars in compensation in an out-of-court settlement, which was taken place the morning before Banton’s trial.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Teresa's case was submitted to the jury on the counts alleging breach of contract, negligence and wantonness, and the tort of outrage.   The jury returned a verdict against Akins and in favor of both plaintiffs.   The jury assessed compensatory damages at $450,000 and punitive damages at $150,000, for a total of $600,000 in Megan's case; in Teresa's case, the jury assessed compensatory damages of $200,000 and punitive damages of $150,000, for a total of $350,000.”

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

However, the employer is still responsible for the job-related injury of a private contacotr. However, it is worth noting that the laws surroduning reciieinvg fincial compensation for a work related injury as a privat econtracotr, varies from state to state. Complexity Surrouding Work Related IInjury

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction This case study of SeaWorld of Florida v. Perez is a case where the safety protocols set by SeaWorld were set up to keep trainers safe. However, it could also show that they were put into place due to the violent nature of the killer whales therefore showing that SeaWorld knew the dangers trainer Brancheau would be facing on a daily basis. This case was about the legal issues enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and how the plaintiff established a valid violation under the General Duty Clause of the OSH Act. Additionally it will explain how the elements of a valid claim were satisfied under the OSH Act as well as understanding how OSHA enforces workplace safety and health standards.

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

People in life or death situations should not be held accountable for their actions, It could be the state or city’s fault, They don’t need the burden that they will have to pay a bill or may not get help, Yes, the first responders and others helping do need to get paid but it shouldn’t be about the Money. Therefore, people in life or death situations should not be held accountable for their actions People in life or death situations should not be held accountable for their actions because It could be the state or city’s fault. Building codes can be outdated therefore causing accidents when disaster strikes. They are not updated with the proper materials so they fall and make the situation worse and cause more deaths.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION TO VICARIOUS LIABILITY The misconduct doctrine that imposes responsibility upon one person for the failure of another, with whom the person incorporates a special relationship (such as Parent and child, employer and employee, or owner of vehicle and driver), to exercise such care as a fairly prudent person would use underneath similar circumstances. Vicarious liability could be a legal belief that assigns liability for an injury to someone who failed to cause the injury however who incorporates a specific legal relationship to the one who did act negligently. It’s conjointly spoken as imputed Negligence. Legal relationships that may cause imputed negligence embrace the connection between parent and child, Husband and wife, owner of a vehicle and driver, and employer and employee.

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

A company 's customers are entitled to fair trading practices but they are not entitled to the same consideration as the company 's employees. Stakeholders around the hotel: 3.1. Local governmentThe decisions of government, inevitably affect different groups within society. Increasingly, the government are

Read More
1289 Words | 6 Pages

The reasoning behind it is to motivate employers and mangers to establish a zero tolerance policy. Managers or board members should take each complaint seriously and set good examples for other employees. Since employers are at liability in cases like this, they must act immediately and investigate complaints. Employers cannot

Read More

More about Tardif Vs Wiebe Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document