On 03-18-2016 at approximately 2156 hrs, I was dispatched to the Stripes convienance store (210 E. Central Ave), for report of a theft. Upon arrival, I made contact with the store manager identified as Joseph Bjorgaard (TX-DL # 14091959). Bjorgaard stated, "I had a bank deposit bag with me and after an hour later I realized it was missing. I check the stores video cameras, and observed a silver suv with a Hispanic woman pick up the bag, she placed it on the hood of her vehicle and drove off with it. The deposit bag contained $ 500.00.
The accusation cause a female employee of Target to take Mrs. Moore to a back room where she was questioned and placed under citizen’s arrest. The plaintiff, Mrs. Moore, demonstrated no basis of probable cause. All of Mrs. Moore’s items were priced with numerous price tags but Target stated that it wasn’t unusual for items to be priced more than once. Mrs. Moore also testified that she was humiliated during the arrest and that she had become so anxious and nervous that she could not keep her hands steady in order to etch glass items, which was a side job that she depended on for income.
Predication: On 11/11/17, Asset Protection Manager (APM) Kristin Catucci contacted APM Jakub Orlando regarding Customer Service Associate (CSA) Anthony Stoddart who was suspected of taking money out of the register for personal benefit. Facts: On 11/14/17, APM Orlando reviewed CCTV footage along with POS electronic journal to confirm this allegation. CCTV footage reviled that CSA Stoddart took money from the bottom of the register and placed it into his pocket.
The legal issue would be whether Target security is allowed to accuse customers of stealing before having proof. Mr. Johnson could argue that Target security falsely accused him of stealing. Another issue would be whether Target security is allowed to accuse customers of stealing loud enough for others to hear. Mr. Johnson could argue Target security humiliated and embarrassed him as well as falsely accusing him of stealing loud enough for others to hear.
In my opinion, four major opportunities for PetSmart are products, services, customers, and growth. PetSmart offers numerous of products in multiple categories such as food, toys, beds, crates, etc. Services that are offered are grooming, boarding, training, and veterinary services. PetSmart also treats pets like children. Last but not least another major opportunity for PetSmart is the growth that is planed over the years.
The Brinks Robbery took place in Nanuet, New York on October 20, 1981. The Robbers were by Jeral Wayne Williams, Donald Weems, Samuel Brown, Samuel Smith, Nathaniel Burns, Cecilio Ferguson, David Gilbert, Judith Alice Clark, Kathy Boudin, and Marilyn Buck, and some unknown accomplices. The robbers stole a total of $1.6 million from an armored car at the Nanuet Mall. In the first skirmish between the robbers and the authorities, two police officers and a Brinks armor car guard were killed. There were a couple more gun fights later on between the Brink’s robbers and the police.
Last year the Commision determined that the PCI certification didn 't demonstrate reasonable security in the case of an incident involving ID theft protection company LifeLock. The company was under order since 2010, when it settled a complaint about exaggerated advertising claims. LifeLock was ordered to pay $100 million in December in order to settle Federal Trade Commission contempt charges for violating the terms of the 2010 court order. Still, Ohlhausen claimed that the Commission lacked convincing evidence of a breach and thinks that the FTC approached the situation from the wrong angle.
LifeLock Media Assessment The concept of identify theft protection has continued to grow with the evolution of technology. As data breaches grow consumers and organizations are continually being tasked with ways to protect sensitive consumer information. The core responsibility of the Federal Trade Commissions (FTC) is to protect consumers against deceptive practices. Additionally, the number one complaint the FTC has received in the last 15 years has been identity theft.
Diebel blames attributes the blame to banks when they chose security questions to "improve their security measures for online banking" (2). She says that other websites probably assumed the banks knew what they were doing and followed suit (2). She states that security questions are much more insecure than they seem at first glance, and "the answers to many of them can be easily researched or guessed" (3). She also points out incidents of famous people 's accounts getting hacked into via security questions (5), followed by an example of a recent cyber attack on average people (6, 7). Diebel also includes a quote from a cybersecurity expert stating that one reason security questions are still used is because of convenience, instead of having good security (8).
JPMorgan Chase Bank has faced several lawsuits in recent years. They have been hit with cases concerning fraudulent misrepresentation, bribery, and many things in between. By studying the accusations the company has faced, one receives a better understanding of who is really handling their money. An act of fraudulent misrepresentation cost JPMorgan the fine of a lifetime.
In order for Target to keep customer satisfaction high, they need to keep the number customer being injured or harmed inside the store to a minimum. They also need to make sure the products it sells inside their stores do not harm customers. This risk management work will lay the foundation for the risk evaluation of new products being sold inside the store. Target will also create a process to respond to alerts from manufacturers that there is a potential risk to customer
For example, one theory seems to suggest that harm arises not only from misuse of the data but also from the breach itself. In both Pisciotta and Reilly, customers chose to share information with a trusted institution for a particular purpose; when malicious third parties hacked the defendants ' computer systems, customers lost control over who had access to their personal information. It is not necessary for the probability to be as high as the court in Reilly would require for the breach to cause feelings of powerlessness and anxiety. The Court’s “increased risk” analysis in Pisciotta overlaps with this control theory, but it is not coextensive. Harm under this theory would not necessarily require an increased risk of exposure, as general anxiety and stress stems from the perception of loss of control over personal information, regardless of whether an increased risk of harm can be statistically
In order to stay protected from crime, companies are, “forced either to cooperate with violent groups or to arm themselves against threats” (BTI, 2016). Several groups commit
Retrieved March 06, 2018, from https://www.computerworld.com/article/2495183/security0/dutch-man-sentenced-in-us-to-12-years-in-credit-card-scam.html [3] - David Benjamin Schrooten, aka "Fortezza," Dutch hacker, pleads not guilty to mass U.S. credit card theft. (2012, June 12). The Associated Press. Retrieved March 06, 2018, from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/david-benjamin-schrooten-aka-fortezza-dutch-hacker-pleads-not-guilty-to-mass-us-credit-card-theft/ [4] - Kirk, J. (2012, June 13).
Credit card fraud is a type of identity theft where a hacker steals the credit card information of a user to purchase something or withdrawing money from banks. It’s a critical crime in United States (Sayles, 2012). Everything is online now from paying bills to online purchase, a user can do anything without going anywhere physically. Even user can open a financial account. Because of this criminal can hack the user’s personal information like name, date of birth, social security number.
