Vicki Gord is the owner and President of Thunderbird Trading Post Inc., Ms. Gord established the account March 05, 2004, with a deposit of $100,000.00 with no additional contributions and with interested earned the current account balance is $144,711.00. In 2005 US Bank Corp notified AGL that Vicki Gord had been indicted for money laundering, as an owner and operator of a smoke shop was in connection with a scheme to import and obtain contraband cigarettes from China, and elsewhere, and sell them to the public at large without paying applicable State of Washington taxes. Based on an internet search client plead guilty to trafficking in contraband cigarettes and stipulated in their plea agreements to the amount of the State of Washington’s
The following essay will outline the variances of two case” Illinois v. Gates and Spinelli v. United States. It will discuss the Supreme Court requires to establish probable cause for a warrant. Illinois v. Gates In Illinois v. Gates, law enforcement received a letter (that was anonymous) stating that the Gate family was in the drug transporting business, and operating between the states of Florida and Illinois. Upon investigation, law enforcement discovered that Gates had made the purchase of an Air Line ticket, traveling to Florida.
On October 13, 2015, the AP department received a tip about from the fraud department that a large quantity of gift cards was purchased at their store with fraudulent credit cards on October 2, 2015. Investigative Support/Findings: On October 13, 2015, after receiving a tip from an APM of Manhasset, Fraud Investigations Manager David Hill investigated the purchase of several gift cards. The gift cards were purchased at the New York Lord and Taylor store and at the Albany store from the dates of September 20, 2015 and October 7, 2015. The gift cards were then sold to a company called Raise, who buys gift cards off of customers for a discounted value and re-sells the gift cards for profit. Raise revealed that they had purchased many gift cards from the same seller.
Ronald Watts, 48 years old, a District tactical sergeant, and a patrol officer named Kallatt Mohammed, 47 years old, were both parts of the 2nd District tactical team in the Chicago Police Department. On the eve of February 13, 2012, both officers were formally charged in the U.S. District Court of Chicago by the Northern District of Illinois United State Attorney, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, with government funds theft. Mr. Watts was an 18-year police veteran and Mr. Mohammed was with the Chicago PD for 14 years. Their arrest was due to unseal complaints of police criminal misconduct by two whistleblower officers, Shannon Spalding and Daniel Echeverria , followed by a thorough investigation of, special of the Chicago Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert D. Grant and the police department’s Internal Affairs Division.
MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man on Wednesday was given a chance to avoid prison when he was sentenced to complete a treatment program for admittedly being in possession of methamphetamine. Shaun Hall, 38, 540 High St., previously pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to aggravated possession of meth. In exchange for his guilty plea, a related charge of aggravated trafficking in meth was dismissed. Hall had faced up to a year in prison for the charge, and Judge Robert Rinfret imposed a term of 11 months, but immediately suspended the period of incarceration in favor of five years of community control, which includes the condition he complete a treatment program at the Stark Regional Community Corrections Center.
For over 70 years the homes off of Woodlawn Avenue have been known as Hathorn Court. However, the community came together on Saturday to change the name to Woodlawn Court. "Hathorn Court has always had a stigma about it because of the crime rate that was here. We had a problem bringing it back to where it needs to be," said Property Manager, Don Paul. On Saturday, the community held a block party and clean up day.
On December 15, 2015, Alvin Blake (the “Appellant”) is accused of attempted robbery under Fla. Stat. 812.13. (R. at 9). On December 28, 2016, the Motion to Suppress Identification was heard in Miami-Dade County, in the Circuit Court of the State of Florida, before the Honorable Horace Feinberg, Judge. (R. at 17).
Business Law Case Study Essay: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S (2014) Facts: The Green family runs and owns Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., a national arts and skills chain that has over 500 stores and they have over 13,000 employees. Other facts of the case are that the Green family has been able to organize the business around the values of the Christian faith and has explicitly expressed the desire to run the company as told by Biblical principles, one of which is the belief that the utilization of contraception is wicked. Also, the facts show that under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), occupation -founded group health care plans must offer certain sorts of preventative care, for example, FDA-accepted contraceptive approaches.
Facts: Earl Enmund along with a codefendant at the Florida Supreme Court, was convicted of first-degree murder and robbery as well as given the death penalty. Enmund was not present at the time of the murder, he was in the car waiting for the codefendant to return in order to escape. Under Florida law Enmund was made the aider and abettor meaning that he can be held to the same extent as the principal. Issue: Does the death sentence violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment for someone who did not commit the murder but was the getaway driver? Reasoning:
The case of R. v. Schoenborn is a troubling case involving the death of three children and the defence of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. This defence must be critically analyzed along with the evidence and expert opinions as it could absolve the accused of the charges. As well, the precedent that the verdict provides is critical to the legal system and its future implication and thus give the decision more importance. After a thorough examination of the facts, it is evident that the verdict of the Supreme Court of British Columbia is correct and reflects the administration’s objectives and beliefs. This will be demonstrated through the application of legal principles and elements.
Background Mary Marino, the grievant, was arrested due to a small amount of cocaine and a loaded handgun in her purse on September 22, 2006. She was not on the Company’s property at the time. After being released on $2000 bail, she went to work both that night and the next night. When the Company learned of the arrest and charges on September 24, Marino was discharged. The day after, September 25, the Union filed a grievance which prompted instant arbitration.
Currently, the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona is concerned that illegal immigrants are detained and then deported without their belongings. Border Patrol agents confiscate detainee 's money, cell phones, ID cards and other belongings and in one third to one half of the cases, the detainees are deported and then dropped of in an unfamiliar Mexican town without their belongings. According to the ACLU of Arizona, this practice is contrary to international human rights. Deportees who are transported to a Mexican town where they do not know anyone and are alone, with nothing but the clothes on their backs are vulnerable. The Kino Border Initiative operates in Nogolas, the town where most of the Border Patrol buses leave deportees.
On December 4th 2016, at 0758 EST, Security Officer sterling Carpenter was posted at 1025 Thomas Jefferson lobby, when Security Officer Dave Olsen walks up to the desk holding his chest and complaining of pain in the leg. S/O Olsen said that he took a hard fall in the One Stop Shop after tripping over a hand truck. S/O Carpenter asked S/O Olsen to take a seat, doing so; S/O
This becomes clear when she realizes she is being tracked from place to place because of the use of her credit card (Grisham). ”She withdrew five thousand in cash from her checking account Friday afternoon,
Coastal Property As Martin’s attorney, I believe he should consider his beach house lost to eminent domain with no legal recourse and he should accept the compensation of full market value, which the city authorities are legally obligated to provide (G.S. §40A-64, 2006). Unfortunately, Martin has almost no right to recover his property. The seizure of Martin’s property under North Carolina law and the caselaw precedent of Kelo v. New London (2005) firmly establishes the doctrine of eminent domain. Eminent domain is defined as “the constitutional right of the government to take privately owned real property for a [public use] purpose in exchange for just compensation to the [property] owner” (Kubasek, Brennan, & Browne, 2015, p. 359).
