Rhetorical analyst Omair Khan states that Kennedy “had an enormous level of credibility as well as the authority and experience that comes with being the president of the United States” which is true because as the president, he had a huge amount of good will and was to be believed to turn the circumstances around
Kennedy. Kennedy won the electoral vote 303 to 219, and won the popular vote by a slim 100,000 votes. It was the first televised election, and this factor played a huge role in Kennedy’s success. This election was also the first in which all 50 states participated and was also the first in which both candidates were born in the 20th century. In his campaign, Kennedy mentioned that under the Republicans, the nation had fallen under the Soviet Union, and that as president, he would recognize the need to catch up to the Soviets.
If it weren’t for their constant debates and opportunity to compete publicly against one another, Kennedy would have had no shot in even remotely winning the presidential election of 1960.
Nixon made nuclear arms control agreements with the Soviet Union and diplomatic opening to China and setting the stage for the arms reduction pacts and careful diplomacy that brought about the end of the Cold War. Although it may seem that John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon had little impact on American society, but in reality they brought about great political and social change. Kennedy played a role in revolutionizing American politics. Television began to have an impact on voters. Kennedy’s charismatic and poised performance in the first ever televised presidential debate set the standard for all future debates.1 A solid television debate
Another reason Kennedy is the best choice for president, is because he gives off a strong feeling of youth and strength, which always
Kennedy wisely sticks to using pathos throughout his entire speech, rather than relying on his then-minimal ethos or allowing his stirring speech to become bogged down by logos represented by the dull facts and figures of statistics. As a very young President just starting his first term, Kennedy lacks the reputation and reliability that an older, more experienced politician might have available. While it is true that most of the nation had seen him on television during the Nixon-Kennedy Presidential debates, those debates were the near-total of the people’s exposure to the dashing young President, and a pretty face does not a solid political reputation make! However, no matter how dashing and heroic he might have appeared to be in those
He showed the immense contrast between Kennedy
The media is a major source of information for voters. Voters depend on the media to make their decision on who to support and vote for. As much trouble as the media causes, they play a major role in our political system. The American President accurately depicts the political process.
On the morning of September 26, 1960, presidential candidates Richard M. Nixon and John F. Kennedy sat down for the first of four rounds of debates during their individual presidential campaigns. Kennedy was a comparatively undetermined figure at the time, whereas Nixon was a well-known campaigner with a clear advantage for being a two-time vice-president winner. Set side by side, Kennedy was an inexperienced senator from Massachusetts. It was obvious to see that Kennedy was the underdog in the debate while there were high expectations for Nixon to win the debate comfortably.
In my opinion Kennedy won the 1960 debate against Nixon although the radio listener believed otherwise. Kennedy is one of the greatest speaker from a political aspect. His charisma and confident mannerisms conveyed well to the population viewing the debate on television. Not only did his answer reflect well on his position but his body language show how sure he was on taking on the duty of being the next president of the United States. On the other hand, Nixon did not display this same type of confidence to the television audience but the radio didn’t see his nervousness.
Television was first introduced to the world in 1927. It’s been a major influence in presidential elections since the 1960s, the first televised debate being between Senator John F. Kennedy and Richard Nixon. Prior to the use of television of debates, people listened to them on radios and read about them in newspapers. Never before have people been able to watch these debates-- watch each candidate’s body language, posture, expressions. All they’ve ever gotten to do is listen to their voices and ideas.
In January of 1961 the American people had elected John F. Kennedy as the 35th president of the United States. Kennedy was a young, catholic and handsome democrat who ran against weathered Vice-President Richard Nixon. Kennedy became the president, winning by just 120,000 votes. On September 26, 1960 the nation’s first publicly televised presidential debate was aired and roughly 74 million Americans tuned in to watch. It is often commonly said Kennedy won the debates through his charm, charisma and good looks, without the implementation of televised debates he would not have been elected as the nation’s leader.
As a result, televisions control the people, people spend most time watching tv. News stations show news of celebrities, rather than news about congress or politics. News stations are run by companies, people that run-in politics, the stations are to show what they want them to show. Also ads are bought for politicians to get their polls up in the elections. Politicians are searched out to be millionaires to buy their own ads.
Media attention in the most recent 2016 presidential election was at its height. Political ads dominated every frame of media, from ABC to Facebook and to Twitter. However, the apparent oddity that many have observed in this election is a false narrative. The 2016 presidential election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump was not unusual. Sensationalism produced by the media has greatly influenced contemporary views of elections and their candidates’ campaigns.
Social media has changed the presidential elections tremendously, in both positive and negative aspects. Twitter has especially revolutionized the elections as a result of the various responses posted from citizens over the past years as the internet has become more popular throughout generations. Social media pages tend to attract more of an audience in this day and age in comparison to other means of advertisement. Political leaders have picked up on this statistic, and decided to get on board with the "Twitter trend" in order to gain interaction and publicity. A huge turnout came about, especially amongst millennial's.
