Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates the apology analysis
Socrates the apology analysis
Socrates the apology analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socrates the apology analysis
Socrates the apology analysis
Socrates the apology analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He’s aware that something needs to be done and that he can work towards the greater good, despite to obvious danger to his own life. In Socrates' work, the philosopher, after his slow journey to the upper world begins to discover the beauty of the world around him after the painful shock of the
Anish Yonjan Philosophy 1301-73426 Prof. Marcos Arandia Feb. 19, 2017 Explain and evaluate Socrates' claim in the Apology that "the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being," and briefly analyze and discuss the particular method he uses to discover the truth (i.e., dialectics or the Socratic Method), using at least two examples from Plato's Euthyphro and/or Apology. Do you agree that a human being cannot live a fully satisfying life if he or she remains ignorant, like the slavish prisoners in Plato's cave? Why or why not? In the Plato’s Apology, Socrates claims that the “unexamined life is not worth living for a human being”.
The version of Socrates presented in both The Apology, Crito, and The Republic could very well be two different versions of Socrates as presented by Plato. However, both versions of Socrates have one thing in common: they both value the importance of philosophy and they both defend philosophy as something that is important to humanity. The Apology is Socrates defending not only himself, but also philosophy as an area of study that could be useful to the city of Athens. Socrates is trying to defend himself and his study and he tries to distance himself from the sophists in that they charge for money.
In this play the Socrates here doesn't sound like the Socrates from the Apology or the real life Socrates. The real Socrates doesn't actually teach per say, he teaches in a way that makes you yourself use your brain. He makes you question everything and understand things based on your own perception. The writer of this play clearly felt as if Socrates was a major problem in his society for allowing people to actually try to think outside of the box and ask questions. He most likely enjoyed the fact that everyone were robots and all thought alike and believed in the same thing because it brought no need to bring out discussion.
Since the day of the judgment between Athens and Socrates in 399 year B.C. many historians, philosophers, and students wonder to know whether Socrates was Guilty. Philosopher was accused in corrupting the youth, not believing in the recognized gods and introducing new divinities and in the rejection of civic life in democratic society. It is very difficult to answer on this question, may be even impossible. In my opinion, there are three types of people: 1.
Socrates was a greek philosopher who found himself in trouble with his fellow citizens and court for standing his grounds on his new found beliefs from his studies about philosophical virtue, justice, and truth. In “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates defended himself in trial, not with the goal of escaping the death sentence, but with the goal of doing the right thing and standing for his beliefs. With this mindset, Socrates had no intention of kissing up to the Athenians to save his life. Many will argue that Socrates’ speech was not very effective because he did not fight for his life, he just accepted the death sentence that he was punished with. In his speech he said, “But now it’s time to leave, time for me to die and for you to live.”
It would seem that the reasoning that Socrates uses about halfway into the Apology (just after he has finished speaking with Meletus) for why it would be illogical to fear death should also work inversely. That is to say that the very same reasoning would also seem to suggest that it would be illogical to look forward to death. Therefore, when Socrates suggests, towards the end of the dialogue, that he is actually looking forward to dying, one might be tempted to conclude that he is contradicting his own logic. However, on closer examination of the wording and the context of these two discussions of death, one can see that he has, in fact, not contradicted himself, after all.
Socrates compared himself to a Gadfly because he stings the lazy horse in other words the “Athens”. Socrates believed as he states that “God has commanded me – as I am persuaded that he had done
I agree with what Socrates is trying to say in his defense against the council. Socrates believes that we truly have to understand ourselves in order to find the true meaning in life. I believe that this claim stands true because if you aren’t sure about what things in life make you happy and what things you want to get in life then your ambitions might not be in the right place. Throughout his whole defense Socrates doesn’t once admit that he believes he’s at fault. Socrates instead tries to clear up some of the rumors and false thoughts that were spread about him.
In the "Apology," during Socrates’ trial, he received an offer to save his life as long as he abandoned preaching philosophy and innovating new Gods. Socrates refused to accept any lesser form of punishment (such as a fine or exile) because he proposed he should be rewarded rather than a punishment. Socrates did not believe he committed a crime, but rather provided a service in encouraging the youth of Athens to pursue moral and intellectual perfection, so his alternative offer is, fittingly, a reward rather than a penalty. As an illustration, he told them he deserved the same treatment of the mean of Athens by receiving his meals in the Prytaneum. He stated, “Perhaps some of you think that in saying this, as in what I said about lamenting
During the final moments in the Socrates trial before the final decision would be made if Socrates were guilty or not guilty for his actions, he made a statement saying, “the unexamined life is not worth living”. Socrates has a very deep meaning with this bold statement that he wanted to expose to the Athenian people. Throughout the trial, Socrates stated many points that describe what the unexamined life is not worth living towards his “New” accusers. He pointed how we need to examine and reflect upon our life to truly get a true understanding of our nature/world.
Lastly, towards the end of the Apology, Socrates says that “the unexamined life is not worth living”. These phrase has had a great amount of interpretations over the years due to Socrates never fully explaining what he was trying to say. My interpretation of this phrase is, that life is valuable and short that you never know when it can be taken away from you. Due to this you have to explore life, ask questions, never have a question unanswered, and lastly live life to the fullest with no regrets. Being able to live these kind of life you will have examined life and have had a great life full of knowledge and
The Apology is the regretful acknowledgment of a failure to follow the norms, but the in the Five dialogue it is a record of the formal speech to the jury of Socrates brought in his personal justification at the trial written by Plato. The Apology is the third part which explains the life of the Socrates, who he is, and what he did to find the wisest person in the Athens. The first part of the five dialogue is the main speech by the counter-assessment, and finally, last words to the jury, both to those who voted for the death sentence. Socrates is the wise philosopher who was brought in the courtroom due to some violation as thought by the people and the Meletus. Meletus was the accuser who had claimed two things on him.
Everyone is searching for their purpose in life. In order to understand Socrates’ statement, there needs to be an understanding in what it means to be human Being. Through this, Socrates recognizes that human beings
Socrates is known in today’s world as one of the greatest philosophers in history. Searching for the truth about wisdom, Socrates brought many developing ideas to ancient Athens, not just during his life but even after his death. Examining all sides of an argument, convinced that the “unexamined life is not worth living”, Socrates is known for never placing belief into one thought, therefore, causing confusion with even the simplest of ideas and making his opponents angry. Being a revolutionary thinker, he acknowledged the advantages and significance of analyzing secular components as opposed to committing his life to religion. Socrates’ outright rebelliousness toward religion and tradition being the main purpose of life and thought was so