ipl-logo

The Arguments Against Federalism In The United States

1211 Words5 Pages

The American Government, as we know it, plays a pivotal role in every Americans life whether we realize it or not, every decision they make and every one that we fight for has the ability to change certain aspects about our daily lives, big or small. With the Government being so much apart of our lives it is important to understand the levels that each one plays, how they came to be and how there are some could areas that could benefit from the private sector that could perform some of these roles with less of a bias and possibly with better efficiency. The Democratic Government is separated into three levels, which are local, state and national levels with each one performing certain task and making decisions that get implemented into …show more content…

Ensuring separation of power is important for avoiding tyranny, this stands true for then and now and even if one group was able to take control over all three branches of government, federalism makes sure that they would all still function independently. Arguments against federalism, then as well as now, is the lack of accountability for failed policies between the national and state government when there is an unclear divide on where power lies. At the conception of federalism the founding fathers created a positive attitude toward the national government in regards to regulations and now, Government regulations are seen as problems and not solutions. With so many changes since its birth the America we see today, in my opinion, is not what I think they had in …show more content…

When some one calls 911, they are calling a center that notifies the appropriate service you need such as fire rescue, police or EMT depending on the emergency. If these jobs were taken over by the private sector then it would be someone doing that job for money and not truly wanting to help the community and who wants someone that “doesn’t really want to be there today” attempting to save their life in an emergency. It comes down to government standards that I am not sure could be extended to the private sector that could create their own rules and standards. Then there are programs like NASA that, in recent years, has been focused on both space exploration and earth sciences but with the 2016 budget the earth science program, which is focused on global warming, would be cut by $264 million with space exploration receiving an increase of $195 billion for a planned trip to mars and Jupiter in the next 10 years. (Foust , "House Budget Cuts NASA Earth Science Program- SpaceNews.com") If a private company was able to take over the earth science program and use technology that was

Show More
Related

DBQ Summary: Federalism And The Constitution

756 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism prevented tyranny because neither the central government or the states had too much power. This is important because the power would be split between the two. For example, things that would happen in the state would be reserved for the state such as holding elections, establishing schools, and passing marriage and divorce laws. While on the other hand, powers given to the central

Read More

How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Essay

703 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism guards against tyranny, so does the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the House of Representatives and the Senate. Each guard in different, unique ways. All of them do the same job to guard against tyranny. Federalism divides the government into the state and central governments. The division of powers gives each branch of government equal power, while checks and balances allows each branch to check each other.

Read More

Constitution Guard Against Tyranny Analysis

882 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism helped the Constitution guard against tyranny by specifying which powers belong to the Federal government and which ones belong to the State government. This separation leads to a double security so that the state government can watch the federal government and the federal can watch the state. James Madison states in his Federalist Papers #51(Document A), “power surrendered by the people is first divided between two

Read More

Essay On How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

619 Words | 3 Pages

Federalism protects against tyranny because by separating between two different types of government then their is less chaos when it comes to voting and making laws and the state government controls smaller things like elections and building places there.

Read More

Framers Of The Constitution Dbq

1017 Words | 5 Pages

The country needed to focus on bigger issues at hand and have the power needed to respond to larger threats. Federalism has allowed for the government to efficiently respond to the issues of the 21st century, something that would’ve been entirely impossible under the Articles of Confederation. With events such as the tragic occurrence of September 11, President Bush and the other branches of the national government already knew what specific rights they had and were more able to respond to such an attack on the country. People from different states united to fight against terrorism and show that Americans was standing behind the government. Federalism over the years has exemplified that although the national government

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Guard Against Tyranny

837 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism breaks apart the powers given to the central (Federal) government and those powers given to the states. As seen in document A1, a source from James Madison from Federalist Paper #51, 1788; Madison states, “In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments, and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments.” This idea from Madison is the idea of the division of power between the Federal Government and State Governments. Federalism provides a “Double security,” that protects the rights of the citizens of the United States of America. As the governments will be controlled by itself, the separate governments will also control each other.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Federalists

730 Words | 3 Pages

Under the guidance of Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, Federalists became a popular political party at the end of George Washington’s term. As a proud Federalists in The United Stated under George Washington, a numerous amount of hypocrisy has consumed the population on, “What were Federalists’ views?” A Federalist strongly believed in the power of the national government because the central government would have yielded stability to the country. Instead of a democracy or popular sovereignty, an “aristocratic leadership,” would better lead the nation (History in the Making - Chapter 10).

Read More

Essay On How Does The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

813 Words | 4 Pages

Federalism is just one of the few ways the constitution guards against tyranny. “The power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments…”(James Madison, Federalist Paper #51,1788), the thought was to

Read More

Federalists: Becoming Too Powered By A Strong National Government

299 Words | 2 Pages

The Federalists fought for stability and safety supplied by a strong national government. This excluded including the Bill of Rights, which were unnecessary and dangerous with the restrictions put on people’s freedoms and rights. The advantage of federalism was that it prevented the government from becoming too powerful since there was a dispersal of power from the national government to the state. This would help the people have a voice through their states and bring unity. If the system were to stay the same there would be mayhem and violence among the states.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Federalism

1823 Words | 8 Pages

This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

Read More

Anti Federalists Arguments

487 Words | 2 Pages

During the process of ratifying the constitution, the federalists and anti-federalists had major disagreements on what views and ideas should be presented. Because of all of the disagreements, the two groups were eventually divided and each held their own views on what the constitution should carry. The federalists were a group of led by Alexander Hamilton and were the first political party of the United States. Most of the federalist lived in urban areas.

Read More

Anti Federalist Arguments

151 Words | 1 Pages

Finally, the New Constitution needed to be ratified but had difficulties being passed. The Federalist, newspapers, were in support of ratification. These areas expressed the importance of the new Constitution. Antifederalist, on the other hand, believed that the Constitution would give too power to the central government while states would have little to none. In the end, anti-federals lost and federalist, those in favor of the new Constitution, added a bill of rights to satisfy anti-federalist.

Read More

Essay On Anti Federalist

622 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti Federalist The anti-federalist papers were written document about why the idea of federalist is bad. three problems they had with the Constitution were the president as military king, what congress can do; what a state can not, bill of rights. These were only three of the issues I found that the anti-federalist had with the constitution. The first paper I found was the The President As Military King, anti-federalist paper #74.

Read More

How Did Federalist 51 Impact Today's Government

543 Words | 3 Pages

Not only is there a federal government, but there are also state and local governments. Furthermore, there are forms of government that function on a higher basis than local governments, but on a lower basis than state governments. Although the federal government has overall control on how the country functions, the other forms of government have a considerable impact on the laws of each area. All states have varying laws that lie along the same lines. For instance, the age to get a Driver’s license is not the same from state to state, but they are around the same age.

Read More

More about The Arguments Against Federalism In The United States

Related Topics

Open Document