The Arguments Against Immanuel Kant's Formula Of Universal Law

273 Words2 Pages
Immanuel Kant is the central figure in our modern philosophy. His position was to establish a single principle, the categorical imperative, from which all additional maxims can be derived. This is the idea that an action that is morally right is one that is done in accordance to the categorical imperative. An action is right only if to have everyone act in that situation using the same rule, rationally willing the rule universal. *This essay is to argue against Immanuel Kant’s categorical imperative as the universal law; it should apply to all people at all times. This idea is known as the formula of universal law. One must ask oneself “should I act in a way that I could will that my maxim become a universal law?” The formula of humanity,

More about The Arguments Against Immanuel Kant's Formula Of Universal Law