The crowning jewel of this character assassination was the opposing council’s accusation that she had sexually abused her son (Cadbury, 207). After Marie Antoinette’s execution, her daughter was exiled from France. Her son is said to have died under mysterious circumstances, and it is believed that her son endured frequent physical abuse while imprisoned (Cadbury, 332). Furthermore, the end of the monarchy marked the beginning of the Reign of Terror in which thousands of people died, mostly of unjust causes. France descended into chaos just like Brissot had feared. Most of these points of evidence would not be able to stand alone, but together create a strong case for the unfair trying of King Louis XVI. Of course, all evidence that exists
Flaws in the Main Argument of The Daughter of Time In The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey, the main character Alan Grant comes to the conclusion that King Richard III did not kill his nephews due to circumstantial evidence. However, many of his arguments, which he seems to think are bulletproof, are actually quite flawed. Most of his case is based on assumptions, rather than hard evidence. In a court, he would not be able to win a case based on assumptions about people and their biases; he would need to present proof that Richard did not kill his nephews, and was not a tyrant.
Antoinette Frank’s hiring was neglectful because throughout the hiring process she lied a couple of times and even though she was caught she was still hired. She had lied about her mental health as she had received psychiatric help when she was young. Even after failing the psychological evaluation twice she was still granted the police officer position. According to the psychiatric that analyzed her, he advised that she should not be hired and after that outcome she was still hired because New Orleans Police Department was short on officers. The doctors ruling was that she was an unacceptable candidate but the police department decided to overlook this decision.
Queen Joana of Navarre was accused differently since she was a Queen. She was mainly accused of hiring two magicians to commit necromancy to kill King Henry IV. “In a deeply religious and superstitious culture, witchcraft seemed very real, but it was also invoked as a political weapon.” To further analyze this, Queen Joana was accused for her money. A dower was needed for the marriage of Catherine de Valois.
Mary Surratt should have been put to death because, she helped the killer and knew other plots John Wilkes Booth was planning. Mary Surratt worked with John Wilkes Booth to assassinate Abraham Lincoln. She hid guns that were later used in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln (Source 2). This shows that she gave weapons to John Wilkes Booth on purpose. She lied to the police that she didn’t know John Wilkes Booth(Source 2).
Jean Walker Tassin he is honorable because he tried his best not to outright lie to the American people, he was fit morally for the office of the president was never involved against crimes against women, the American people or America itself. He fought diligently for peace across the globe and attempted to bring our troops home whenever and whereever possible, he never had 12 year old tweet rants in 8 years of his presidency, no one in his administration was brought down do to ethics violations or criminal indictments. He did his best to help the working poor in this country including passing the affordable care act despite having every Republican in the house and the senate vote against each and every piece of legislation that he attempted
They cannot live with her, but cannot survive without her. Joan of Arc reflects the qualities of Ultima; the French celebrated her while the English burned her at the stake. After the teen helped France to beat the English, the losers, “could not understand how they had been defeated by a mere girl… [and tried] Joan for… sorcery, heresy, and witchcraft” (Famous cases: the trial of Joan of Arc). When people, especially men, face failure at the hands of a woman, they tend to lash out and become enraged. An innocent French child burned to death simply because she fought her foes well.
In his work, When the King Took Flight, Tackett used a description of the humble inn keeper Jean-Baptiste Sauce to detail how an average citizen shaped the political course of France and, for that matter, the future of royal authority in Europe. Tackett used accounts from the period to detail his narrative of events surrounding the King’s capture in Varennes, France. According to Tackett, Jean-Baptiste Sauce recognized the King and his family and housed them in his home to prevent them from fleeing abroad. The actions of this concerned average citizens ultimately led to the King being forced to return to Paris. Once there, events quickly compounded until eventually the King and his wife Queen Marie Antoinette were both beheaded in 1783.
The notorious killing machine of the French Revolution was, in fact, the guillotine. They had used the guillotine to execute anyone that would have refused to obey what the government would have wanted at the time. Out of the thousands of people to be executed by this killing machine, some higher power was also taken to. This included King Louis XVI and Marie-Antoinette. Estimated of the number of lives taken by the guillotine during the French Revolution range from 17,000 to 40,000 citizens.
Despite the credentials of many executive leaders of our sovereign province, there is a disparate bracket of presidents in where their actions hindered them from meeting my criteria as an entity. The ninth President, William Henry Harrison along with twelfth Head of State Zachary Taylor were robbed of finalizing their presidential terms. William Henry Harrison, a former veteran was known for his lengthy inauguration and his short-lived presidential term that endured only thirty-two days due to pneumonia that led to his fatality in 1841. Likewise in his omission, Zachary Taylor acknowledged as a war hero in the military was only able to accomplish barring slavery before he passed away from “Cholera Morbus” in 1850 which naturally led him to
Riel had a jury of only six men, all of which the magistrate, Richardson, had personally chosen, none of which were Catholic nor Francophone. They had found Riel guilty, however had a recommendation of mercy that was soon denied by Judge Richardson by having Riel sentenced to death. Upon allowing the jury to come to a verdict, Magistrate Richardson had failed to point out important points to the men such as, the fact that certain charges against Riel had not been proven. Another judicial issue of Louis Riel’s trial was how the charges that were laid against him were ancient and from the laws of the British. They were illegally applied to and therefore proving how the conviction and
Joan of Arc had an important role in the Hundred Years’ War for a French peasant girl who basically led France to its victory, and was able to save the monarchy. During her teenage years, Joan started to hear voices, which she claimed to be the voices of Saint Michael, Saint Catherine, and Saint Margaret. Later on, those voices spoke to her telling her that the dauphin had to be crowned and that the English had to be expelled from France. She had many obstacles in the way but in the end they were convinced. The French believed her, because the court believed that only a miracle could save the country.
Jean Valjean was in prison, the absolute monarchy of France was replaced by a governing monarch. During the time he went into the convent, to start his family with Cosette. We get from this the common theme of
A significant theme that Lynn Hunt explores is representational culture. Specifically, how the family and individual members of the family are depicted through the arts and literature in the advent of the printing revolution. This is a broader theme explored throughout the monograph. Representations of the fallen King, the Band of Brothers, and the Bad Mother through the despised Marie Antoinette. While this is not the main theme of the book, it gives the reader a good idea about the pervading political climate of 18th century France.
This essay will examine the historical accuracy of the film Les Miserables in terms of the social, economic and political conditions in French society post French Revolution. The film Les Miserables depicts an extremely interesting time in French history (from about 1815-1832.) Even though the story line does not depict every detail and event that occurred during the time period as well as the fact that some aspects are dramatized for entertainment purposes, the film effectively spans thirty years of economic, political and social aspects of French Society. However it also manages to bring in references to the past, the French Revolution (1789-1799) and the impact it had on the society portrayed in the film.
The fight for freedom often causes the most lives to be lost. The French Revolution caused one of the most violent times in history. The general population of France grew tired of the oppression placed on them from the first and second ruling estates. So the people, famished and irate, stormed the Bastille prison and tore down its stone walls, taking the abundance of weapons inside (Marie Antoinette and the French Revolution). The masses then protested in front of the royal palace, killing guards but not making it past the gates (Marie Antoinette and the French Revolution).