ipl-logo

The BBC Prison Study: The Stanford Prison Experience

734 Words3 Pages

The BBC Prison Study (2002).
1. What is the title of the text and what is the text about?
The BBC Prison experience in 2002 was similar to the Stanford Prison experience. Rather, it is considered complementary to it, but it was conducted under strict ethical controls and standards to avoid the mistakes that occurred in the first experiment in 1971I chose it because I would like to know the results, how the experiment was carried out, and under what criteria. I suggested it in a forum discussion and wondered how the changes would affect the experience. " The BBC Prison Study explores the social and psychological consequences of putting people in groups of unequal power. It examines when people accept inequality and when they challenge it." (Haslam …show more content…

Participants underwent physical and psychological examinations and were informed of the details of the study and its purpose. The entire study was conducted in a windowless prison-like environment. Prisoners had basic amenities in their cells. (Haslam & Reicher, 2008).The guards were authorized to place prisoners in solitary confinement cells if deemed necessary, and they were empowered to penalize prisoners, revoke privileges, and isolate them. However, they were instructed not to use physical violence. The guards had access to all areas of the prison and were provided with uniforms and better living arrangements. On the eighth day, the study was terminated prematurely due to ethical concerns. (Haslam & Reicher, …show more content…

The 15 volunteers were divided into five groups of equal emotional and psychological strength, and one from each group was chosen to play the role of the guard and the two played the role of the prisoner. The prison was designed at Elstree Studios. (Wells, 2002).
6. Have I heard/read anything similar or dissimilar? What was it?
Yes, as I pointed out at the beginning, this is similar to the Stanford Prison Experiment that Professor Zimbardo did. The two experiments have reached almost identical results, which is the adoption of people to the role that is asked of them. As in the Stanford experiment, the prisoners in the BBC prison accepted the role of submission, while the guards practiced the role of violence and domination. (Study Smarter, n.d).
7. Do I agree or disagree with the views expressed by the author? Why?
It is difficult to offer a personal opinion in scientific experiments and psychological research. But by observing the behavior of some people involved in violence, I partly agree with the conclusions of this study. Some of those I saw practicing violence grew up in a quiet environment and lived their lives in a normal way, but because of the roles that were asked of them, they turned to violence. With varying levels of violence and the ability to be bullying and abusive, I think some people are more inclined to play this role than others. Even in the Stanford experiment, prisoners reported that some guards were tough and others were

Show More
Related
749 Words | 3 Pages

In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

These series of events seemed to bring out the worst in both prisoners and guards. Prisoners were losing all sense of personal identity after being referred to as numbers and not personal names this made them feel less important and they successfully believed it to be true. After six intense days of Phillip Zimbardo’s conforming to social roles experiment a graduate student who was only there to take notes and interview was so shocked by what she saw she demanded the experiment end straight away as it was degrading to watch and degrading for all who took part as Phillip Zimbardo and his team watched the situation descend into chaos she was only the voice that spoke up about how bad the experiment truly

Read More
2191 Words | 9 Pages

Back in 1971 there was a prison experiment that took place in Stanford University and it explains clearly why these cases happen in the prison and jail environment. Philip Zimbardo, a psychologist did this study to show what kind of behavior happens when they people are given authority and it also shows how they use their power affecting the situation they are put into. In this research paper we are going to visit the case of Los Angeles Men’s central jail and find out what went wrong. We will also take a look into what happened in Abu Gharib prison and see if this is an ongoing trend in the correction facilities. We will then look back on the Stanford Prison study conducted by the psychologist Philip Zimbardo in 1971 to see if this experiment truly proves that behavior does change resulting in the abuse of the inmates by the officers.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

The participants in the trial were in such severe psychological discomfort that the experiment, which was supposed to last two weeks, was stopped after only six days. The results demonstrated how the establishment of jail brutality and violence was influenced by the established roles and power dynamics within the simulated prison environment.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

In this prison, inmates were subject to psychological abuses and absolute isolation. This “…demonstrated that the state’s power was in fact growing rather than shrinking, at least with regard to punishment” (Berger,

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

With the guards becoming crueler, it pushed the prisoners to pursue the role as a real-life prisoner. The prisoners began to feel humiliated by the guards and mentally harassed. One became so depressed that he had so much rage with uncontrollable crying, he was set free from the experiment (627). The guards would taunt the prisoners by singling them out because they would beg for it and they simply did not see eye to eye. As the hours passed, new emotions were being found within the prisoners and guards as this experiment was being conducted.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

This experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most infamous and controversial psychological experiments to ever take place to this day. In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo created an experiment that tested the changes one endures when they have to adapt in a prison environment and provided an explanation for the dehumanizing effects of the penile system. 24, college-aged, men were chosen to participate in the 2 week long experiment by flipping a coin to decide whether they’re given the role of prisoner or guard. After their roles were determined, they were given uniforms, cells, identification numbers, etc. Little did he know that the results of this experiment would give some of the most ethically challenged results of time.

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

Some of the prisoners were changed into being obedient to the power against them as a result of the assigned guards' abuse of their position of authority by tormenting the captives. Following the study, Zimbardo was subject to widespread criticism for the lack of safety and regulation. Despite being labeled a failure experiment, the Stanford prison experiment has : broadened our

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

They also concluded that the environment of the prison played a vital role in the way the guards treated the prisoners. It is believed that this experiment changed the way some U.S. prisons are

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

As a point of reference, the prison system conceals the victim's experience since the inmates don’t have much access to outside communication, and are allowed to have horrible relationships with staff and other inmates. To support an article states, “Most correctional facilities allow limited movement and communication, scant access to work or educational programming, and hostile and dehumanizing relations with staff.” (Howard; Website) In that statement, it proves that correctional facilities limit what prisoners can express and make living socially harsh. The horrible conditions, and relationships between staff and inmates, create more crime and oftentimes lead to mental health issues due to trauma, and physical illness.

Read More
1613 Words | 7 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity, in particular to the real word circumstances of prison life. It was conducted by in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment” was an experiment that turned into more of a catastrophe for all parties involved. It started out as an experiment to observe whether brutality in prison was due to the guards' predisposition and their “sadistic” personalities or if it was due to the general environment of the prison (Mcleod). Both the guards and the prisoners assumed their roles very quickly and behaved according to their role. It did not take long for the rules of the experiment (no physical abuse) to be broken. It was clear that this power and role of authority went to the guards’ heads and the prisoners adapted to a helpless obedient role.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

The second aspect that should be highlighted from the author’s hypothesis is that guards themselves, the authority was in a specific mind-set which comes with the role, and most significantly the uniform which played a major role. This enabled them, psychology to commit the negative acts against the prisoners in the experiment. What reinforces this idea the uniforms enabled this is the experiment encouraged negative as well as positive engagement with the prisoners. However most of those involved in the guard roles engaged almost entirely in negative behavior.

Read More

More about The BBC Prison Study: The Stanford Prison Experience

Related Topics

Open Document