The story plot that the novel contained flew in ease and understanding to one’s familiarity. But what was amazing what his form of playing with diction too that surprised me the most asides the tricks he played with imagery. Without imagery, a book would pretty much have no meaning and would lose the sense of reading it till the very end. And what I loved about the author was that he kept on putting in words purposely in the right place at the right time of keep you in the game of entertainment. For example in quote’s like, “The guard with no rifle came to the rear of the truck.
The author, O’Brien, was no different, he was aiming for
The many mechanical pieces, police alert, frayed wires, and DNA sequences displayed in the apparatus of the mechanism represent the inner workings of the mind of one of the dogs. The DNA sequence placed below the ‘nose’ of the Hound represents all of the creatures killed for the sport of killing. The firemen on-duty with no job to attend to would program the DNA sequences of animals into the Hound and bet on whether one creature or another would be captured by the Hound first. The Hound comes out of its kennel for these competitions often, functioning only for the sake of gambling. He thinks and breathes death, whether it is for the entertainment of
The Hound is mentioned in multiple parts of the book, and is described as alive but not alive. It is used to hunt down people that have broken the law. The Hound kills people and animals, Sometimes just because they’re there. For example, when a man used the Hound to commit suicide, or how the Hound kills rats and cats. The Hound is also used as a warning to Montag.
The reader has to be able to understand or imagine what the devices mean, to enhance the story. A few examples in the story, were difficult to understand due to the reference. For the most part, this story had some great literary devices. In the story The Most Dangerous Game, Richard Connell
The Mechanical Hound doesn’t sleep and lives in a kennel in the back of the firehouse “The Mechanical Hound slept but did not sleep, lived but not live in its gently humming, gently vibrating, softly illuminated kennel back in a dark corner of the firehouse” (11). There is virtually no escape from the Mechanical Hound “the Mechanical Hound can remember and identify ten thousand odor-indexes on ten thousand men without resetting” (62), it was also pointed out that the Hound makes no mistakes “Mechanical Hound never fails. Never since its first use in tracking quarry has this incredible invention made a mistake” (62). However, in the novella they never said that the hound was indestructible and this is proving when Montag destroys the Mechanical Hound “Montag lay watching the dead-alive thing fiddle the air and die” (56). This creates hope because if the community as a whole was to work together they would to be able to destroy other hounds to come and start a
In addition to that, the author allows the readers to see what it was like to be in the middle of the most tragic history
A howl from a ghastly hound would even frighten the bravest men, especially in the dark of the night. The Hound of the Baskervilles, a novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, is a murder mystery in which there is a family superstition that there is a demonic hound that stalks and murders them. They believe the hound roams around the moor, waiting for the Baskerville family to arrive and await their demise. Does this hound from hell really exist, or is it just a terrifying hoax? I think the hound does not exist because of eyewitnesses, lack of evidence, and inconsistencies.
The narrator of a book is a key element in piecing together a story. They decide the mood, tone, and flow of the piece. There are many different viewpoints to the same story, which is why narrators can often be the most vital element to a work of literature. The narrator is largely responsible for the reader’s perception and interpretation of the material . This is proven by Mark Twain, in his book, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, in which Twain uses Huckleberry Finn himself as the narrator.
The characters in the story are motivated and realistic which add to the initial intriguing nature of the
On the other hand, the main conflict in the film is Holmes and Watson against the superstition aspect of the case. Unlike in the novel, when Watson and Sir Henry dine at Merripit House with the Stapletons and Mrs. Mortimer, Mrs. Mortimer performs a ritual to call the superstitious spirit of Sir Charles, which a gigantic hound then pounces at the window. This shows that the director wanted to focus on superstition instead of logic. Also, to make the story more interesting, the director shows the dead body of Sir Charles as the exposition instead of Dr. Mortimer’s walking
Abortion. This generation's way of dismissing responsibility of their actions at the expense of human life. Abortion is a horrible thing and a life changing decision and needs to be carefully thought out. Abortion is killing a human being that never had a chance at life. Most of american people have a religious belief.
Jack London 's writing is harsh poetry. He describes scenes in such detail. Reading his work makes you picture how the scenes look in your head. He shows a deeper meaning in the events of his stories(Napierkowski). The point of view of the story is third person limited omniscient.
The author wants to makes the reader tried to answer their own question with imagination and what they believed truly happened at the
It 's interesting how the English language has 26 letters in its alphabet, and writers can turn them into lengthy and twisted, warm, emotional, or even a symbolic work of fiction. More than a great imagination is needed to created a compelling fictional story. It 's the way words are used to pull in readers, push them away, or bring them together. A story 's ability to he discussed is what makes it a good work of fiction.
