ipl-logo

The Booston Tea Party

595 Words3 Pages

The boston tea party Would be considered an act of terrorism by today’s standards under the patriot act. The boston tea party was an event in which colonists, angered by the high tax on tea, hijacked a british ship and dumped nearly 600,000 pounds of tea overboard into the boston harbor (Wikipedia.com). The patriot act states that the definition of terrorism can be classified by 3 things :threatening, conspiring, or attempting to commit any crime using a dangerous device or weapon for something greater than “mere personal gain”, hijack any vehicle,or hurting or killing any protected persons. On these conditions, the boston tea party could be considered an act of terrorism due to the patriot laws. These offenses were hijacking a vehicle, hurt …show more content…

George Hewes, a colonists who participated in the boston tea party,stated that “We then were ordered by our commander to open the hatches and take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard, and we immediately proceeded to execute his orders, first cutting and splitting the chests with our tomahawks (Hewes,George)”. Since the patriot act states That terrorism can be classified as terrorism if the crime is being committed with a dangerous weapon with the goal of anything greater than “mere personal gain”. since the colonists used tomahawks to break open the tea boxes and the boston tea party was not for anyone's personal gain, the boston tea party would be classified as an act of terrorism under the patriot …show more content…

George Hewes was noted as saying “One Captain O'Connor, whom I well knew, came on board for that purpose, and when he supposed he was not noticed, filled his pockets, and also the lining of his coat. … I seized him by the skirt of his coat, and in attempting to pull him back, I tore it off... to run a gauntlet through the crowd upon the wharf nine each one, as he passed, giving him a kick or a stroke. The patriot act states that hurting or killing any protected persons is considered terrorism. When they tried to seize Captain O’Connor, who is a protected person due to him being a captain of a british trading ship , this would be considered harming a protected because in the process of trying to seize Captain O’connor he ripped the jacket off of him which may have injured him.

The boston tea party can be considered an act of terrorism because it broke all of the definitions of terrorism under the patriot law. The patriot law says that any crime committed by: using a dangerous weapon, hijacking a vehicle, or assaulting a protected person. Since the boston tea party met all definitions of terrorism by the patriot act there is no doubt in my mind that the boston tea party was an act of

Show More
Related
77 Words | 1 Pages

I like how you stated there were other ways the Americans could of got Britain to treat them better. The Sons of Liberty were willing to act in non-peaceful protest; however, when American’s made the colonists the constitution they made sure to only allow peaceful protest. Only allowing peaceful protests is essential, but I almost think it is a little hypocritical. Even though the Boston Tea Party fits under terrorism the colonist definitely got their point

Read More
1558 Words | 7 Pages

The American Boston tea party was probably the most unreasonable and destructive action taken by either of the two parties during this period, yet somehow historians portray this act as a sign of courage and independence. However, no matter how unreasonable the Americans were, they got the response they wanted from the British. The British responded to the Boston Tea Party with the “Coercive Acts” or the “Intolerable Acts” as some put it (“The Third Imperial Crisis”). This is where British reasonability exited the picture. The Intolerable Acts were four different acts that served as punishment rather than advancement of the British economy.

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

Not really. Nobody was drinking the tea. It was a protest by the Sons of Liberty who dressed as Native Americans who boarded 3 tea ships and threw the ships’ tea cargo into Boston Harbor. The costumes didn’t fool anyone and the British knew it was the colonists who had destroyed the

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Was the Boston Massacre Really a Massacre? One of the most common things talked about in the history of the U.S.A. is the Boston Massacre, but was this historical event commonly looked at as a massacre really a massacre. I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all instead it was just the act of self defense of a few british soldiers that were being attacked by upset colonists. One of the most said things about the Boston Massacre is that the british soldiers fired into a crowd of innocent people, but there is many pieces of proof that says otherwise.

Read More
290 Words | 2 Pages

On the night of March 5, 1770, A major conflict between the American Colonists and British soldiers arose on King street. The British were taxing the Colonists, and the Colonists were protesting and boycotting against the taxes creating tension between the two sides. Since this happened, the British soldiers are the ones to blame for the Boston Massacre. The British Soldiers are responsible for the Boston Massacre According to the Committee of Boston, (Sam Adams, John Hancock and more…) “ This is without warning of their intention and killed 3 on the spot.”

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

One of the most iconic acts of rebellion from American history is the Boston Tea Party. Dressed as Indians, the Brothers of Liberty snuck onto three boats and dumped British-backed East India Trading Company tea into the Boston Harbor. This was in response to unfair taxation being implemented on the American Colonies. That was some 200-plus years ago when times were very different, but through their acts of bravery and courage, they have inspired a movement today called the Tea Party Movement. Different from the Boston Tea Party, the Tea Party Movement is a political group rather than one act of rebellion.

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

John Brown: Freedom Fighter or Terrorist In the world today there are many definitions of terrorism, but there is not one definition for terrorism because not everyone can agree on one. I believe John Brown is a freedom fighter, but the actions he attempted like at Harper's Ferry and Pottawatomie Creek is most likely to be a terrorist act. When John Brown was young he lived in a religious family. John Brown memorized the Bible and strongly believed in God.

Read More
547 Words | 3 Pages

Burgesses Reps. But much to their surprise or dismay, the brave leaders and Patriotic Troops of George Washington and others kept meeting, surprising the enemy nation trying to take away all what they’ve worked ridiculously hard for and succeed. The Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party are conflicts that lead up to the Revolutionary War, the break from Great Britain gaining the young Nation’s Independence from the strong nation. Ending in America with freedom and independence, and being recognized to be an independent nation by France and

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

51 It’s a cold December day in 1773 as the Sons of Liberty prepare make history. The Sons of Liberty march up the docks of Boston to make the ultimate act of defiance against the newly established laws and taxes implemented by the tyrannous British. The British sought to tighten their tyrannical control on the colonies with unfair laws and taxes, however the Sons of Liberty weren't so willing to be forced to follow these limitations. In revenge, they dumped 92,000 pounds of British tea into the ocean.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

Terrorism is the act of attacking a certain place or a person to get something out of it. Using modern features of terrorism John Browns actions on Pottawatomie Creek and Harpers Ferry, while unjustified define him as a terrorist. Using John Brown as an example of a terrorist. John Brown was born into a deeply religious family. Which lead him to becoming an abolitionist.

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Over the history of the United States, there have been many attempts of terrorism on our soil, many through domestic roots. One such political quarrel that marked the radicalization of the American public far enough to bring about terrorism were on the terms of certain legislations, the concept of abolitionism and anti-abolitionism. Legislations like the Missouri Compromise, and Fugitive Slave act were very controversial to the general public, both in the North and South. At this time, many abolitionists chose to perform pacifist demonstrations rather than violent conflict to achieve their dream. Generation of sentiment against slavery culmunated in John Brown was a calculated terrorist as he used extreme forms of violence against the populus

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Terrorism is the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. The case/incident that will be mentioned routinely will be the assassination of Archduke Franz-Ferdinand and his wife Sophie. On 28 June 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg, were shot dead in Sarajevo by Gavrilo Princip, one

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

According to Enders & Sandler, terrorism is, “the premeditated use or threat to use violence by individuals or subnational groups in order to obtain a political or social objective through the intimidation of a large audience beyond that of the immediate victims” (Lecture 1, slide 9). Now this is not to be confused with other phenomena such as; crime, insurgency, guerilla war, asymmetric war, unrestricted war, etc. Terrorists have a political or social motive that drives them. Without this, the violence is just an act of crime. In addition, while you may think asymmetric war and terrorism are the same due to their use of unconventional tactics, they are not.

Read More
1955 Words | 8 Pages

Terrorism, as defined by The U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, is "the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." Moreover, as we dive into the true meaning of this segment, we can relate it to present day anti-terrorism! Take into consideration the key words in this sentence, and link it to history: In 2003, the United States invaded Iraq, according to US President George W. Bush and British Prime minister Tony Blair, “to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein’s support for terrorsim, and to free the Iraqi people.” (2) As noble a statement as it seems, it was a mere cover for a bigger, much more devieous scheme.

Read More

More about The Booston Tea Party

Related Topics

Open Document