ipl-logo

Broken Window Theory

1326 Words6 Pages

We define ourselves by our choices of action. And our choice leads us to our behaviour towards others. Since, humans are a social animal and we live in somewhat developed society, our actions, and our behaviour take us long towards our future hold in the society. These things are interconnected and affect each other largely. Someone’s behaviour towards us can give us a lot of insight into social mechanics, how it works and all. Mostly, we have control over most of our choices, we make and thus in retrospect, our life depends upon the choices we make throughout our life and thus, we have the chains in our hand to tame the beast. We have to decide on one or the other in almost every other moment in our life. We need to take decisions …show more content…

This is where; we have the responsibility over our decisions or actions. Though, the ‘Broken Window Theory’ makes a contradictory prediction here. According to this theory, all the bigger problems in society can be reduced down to some pretty small but neglected issues and thus by solving those small problems we can naturally eliminate most of the bigger problems in the society. One of the consequences of the theory can be regarded as that, our intent or our heart’s desire to do something may not be that much important in the bigger picture, the social context, the immediate situation, we might find ourselves in, is way much more important. This can tip the favour towards the victim or the person doing the act. If we see in that light, we really have not much to do in deciding over actions, as it would be heavily dependent upon the immediate context of our behaviour rather than the our intent to actually do something. Gladwell in his work”The Power of Context” has shown a lot of evidences from psychological studies to prove this theory in action. The study of the prisoners in a simulated environment and their progressed behaviour works in tandem with this theory. People, who showed healthy minds in psychological studies beforehand, started showing repulsive behaviour in just a few days, and the change was so quick that the experimenters had to stop the experiment way before the pre assigned time because of the mental health of the volunteer prisoners. This study was a concrete proof of how our actions may largely depend on our situation in spite of our intent or

Show More
Related
345 Words | 2 Pages

The immediate community around people is the important reason that people act in the certain ways. Usually, what people being like at society is not what they are actually being like as themselves. From their immediate communities, people gain the impressions society gives to them. Some people may misunderstand themselves through being at the society; some people may become selfish by seeing other people act selfishly. Overall, people are changing when context is changing.

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

The threat of Repercussions The threat of repercussions prokoke fear and, therfore, a reaction of obedience in many individuals. The impact of having set ramifications for misbehavior is crucial to ones’ upbringing: The effects when none are in place can can be detrimental. The consequences of Wes Moore’s decisions in comparison to the other Wes Moore, having an absence of any, leads to the success of one and failure of the other.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Individuals allow themselves to be placed in horrific situations. They can be influenced by the society of other individuals but, it ends up being their own decision whether to go through with it or not. The decision comes down to their own moral compass to guide them to make the right decision. However, losing a good moral compass could lead an individual down the wrong path. William Shakespeare explores the idea of poor decisions leading to a downfall in his tragedy, Romeo and Juliet, as Juliet risks the safety and love of her family by putting herself in difficult situations.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

This article demonstrates how Bill Bratton, as the Commissioner of the New York Police Department (NYPD) from 1994 to 1996, William J. Bratton fought crime throughout the city of Ney York with legendary achievement, leading a national revolution in attitudes toward policing. Bratton adopted a “broken windows”1 community policing strategy of zero tolerance for minor offenses and championed statistical analysis to prevent crimes before they occurred. In the 70s and 80s, as Bratton continued his career in policing, institutional theories seemed dominant. Nixon’s brand of “tough-on-crime” and “law and order” conservatism meant that community relations were largely ignored by police. In 1982, James Wilson sought to re-establish some balance.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Sometimes the victim is not aware their actions

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

Blood In, Blood Out Rational Choice Theory According to the Twelfth Edition Criminology: Theories, Patterns, and Typologies, the rational choice theory states that the decision to commit a crime is formed by a human’s thoughts and emotions. It is a view of crime in which decision-making is taking place and the offender is to deal with the charges and benefits of an illegal act they committed. In the movie “Blood In, Blood Out”, each of the main characters in the movie were involved in many actions that lead them to the rational choice theory.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

In their article, James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling they discuss the issue of a broken window within a neighborhood. The do this to explain the issue of vandalism, and how this window was broken due to vandalism. They also stress how this window only creates the issue of more vandalism. They show how this broken window leads to even more criminal behavior within the neighborhood. For the fact, that the conditions of the neighborhood also play a big role in crime.

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

Lighters in the hands of citizens burning cars and businesses, holding a sign, “Hands Up Don’t Shoot” through the war, police on the other side holding their stance like a fence moving together against the community, who they are supposed to protect and serve, turned against them. A war that is close to home about police actions that caused outrage throughout the country. In the article, The Problem with Broken Windows (2016), “James Stewart, president of Newark’s Fraternal Order of Police… [said] that the frequent stops and citations made people mistrust the police…” According to Childress (2016), A police officer placed an individual in a chokehold suffocating him to death, for selling cigarettes on the street.

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

As people live their lives everyday, they tend to make choices that will affect them down the road, whether in a good or a bad way, the choice is in the hands of the individual or the monster. This can be seen in both Beowulf and Salem’s Lot, since the actions of both main villains leads them to death. As we look into the characters, we can see that if they had held back from certain actions, they would most likely still be alive. This also applies to us in real life, for every action there is a reaction, it just depends on how this affects us.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Since the dawn of humanity, people have acted with various intentions and various degrees of judgement. For centuries, people have considered the necessity of considering the outcomes before action. In “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”, Samuel Taylor Coleridge argues that one should avoid impulsive action. Similarly, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley concerns the importance of contemplating the outcomes before action. One should never act without consideration, instead avoiding impulsive behavior.

Read More
1147 Words | 5 Pages

Summary Of Argument, Methods: In 1968, stop and frisk was based on strict guidelines that explained how far an officer can frisk someone according to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Behind the police officers’ stop and frisks, the strategies of broken windows policing and the zero-tolerance policy were introduced. Broken windows theory began in New York during the year of 1982, and former Mayor Giuliani of New York created zero-tolerance policy in 1997. Broken windows was a known policing strategy throughout all departments in the nation.

Read More
1844 Words | 8 Pages

In order to function as an independent human being, individuals need to hold on to their internal selves. External environment influences individuals’ thoughts and behaviors. For example, Gladwell argues “ [i]f a window is broken and left unrepaired, people walking by will conclude that no one cares and no one is in charge. Soon more windows will be broken, and sense of anarchy will spread from the building to the street” (152). If “no one cares” that a window has been broken and no one faces any consequences, people start to assume they are allowed to continue and repeat the action.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

Some may argue and say that situations and environments can control the individual. On one hand, this is true; however, most individuals can control themselves in the environment in most cases. This evidence supports my counterargument because an individual can control his or herself when it comes to different changes in the situation or environment. This evidence refutes the argument because an individual is in control of the situations and

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

How we see ourselves vs how others see us People always suggest others to be themselves. To not care about what others have to say about you. People try to ignore society's opinion about them, not realizing the importance it plays in identity. For a person to feel identified, they must have similarities, differences, and some type of involvement. How we see ourselves and how others see us differ in many ways, but is an important factor of our identity.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Advertisers are negatively affecting the lives of youth by using ads. For example some companies are trying to get into kids minds in the multiple environment that the teens and other age groups are in.(Nathan Brazley) Another example is food companies trying to get you to eat their food that is unhealthy and could make you obese if you eat it everyday.(Buruce Horovitz, Anna Lappé) One of the other ways is that the companies are making you attracted to ads that will enhance you to eat or buy their food and products.(Anna Lappé)

Read More

More about Broken Window Theory

Related Topics

Open Document