The Censors Rhetorical Analysis

548 Words3 Pages

No, matter where you are in the world, distractions are going to get to you, and it affects your primary focus and mission. Distractions keep you from doing your work and keep your mind drifting elsewhere with little side bars in your head. According to source one “Brain Interrupted” By Bob Sullivan and source two “The Censors” by Luisa Valenzuela, both are connected with hindrance among the effect technologies has on the human Brain and Juan retrieving his letter. So, with both Brain Interrupted and The Censors both sources prove that distraction can affect your train of thought or what you are doing in general, with Bob Sullivan he displays his point through technology and the effect it has on you, while Luisa Valenzuela profess her point through her fictional character Juan and how he got bewildered. …show more content…

By using compare and Contrast he justifies how distractions can affect you and how it takes away your primary focus. For instance, in paragraph 11 Bob Sullivan states that “the distractions of an interruption, collaborates with the brain drain of preparing for that interruption made of test takers 20 percent dumber, turning a B- student into a failing 62 percent”. So, Bob Sullivan is using his compare and contrast text structure to generally explain the statistical analysis on the distractions of technology by comparing how the brain can be affected with distractions and also without. Without Doubt technology can bring negative distractions towards your brain, which is contrasted by keeping the use of technology away when completing a task, which increases the brain